Cover not available
Article published In:
Context-dependency of Argumentative Patterns
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:1] 2017
► pp. 3–26

Context-dependency of argumentative patterns in discourse

| ILIAS, University of Amsterdam | Leiden University

This introductory article concludes the examination of prototypical argumentative patterns manifesting themselves in communicative activity types in the political, legal and medical domain reported in this special issue of the Journal of Argumentation in Context (JAIC) and an earlier special issue of the journal Argumentation (2016, 30(1)). First, the results pertaining to the use of pragmatic argumentation in the main argumentation of prototypical argumentative patterns in the various domains are described that were reported in the latter issue. Next, the results are described which are reported in this issue of JAIC; they pertain to prototypical argumentative patterns in the various domains that come into being as a result of the employment of an argument scheme in the main argumentation that is perfectly suited for being used in a certain communicative activity type in a specific domain. In the following section an overview is provided of the most conspicuous differences in the prototypical argumentative patterns between the various communicative domains caused by the institutional preconditions for strategic maneuvering in the communicative activity types that were examined. Finally, some general conclusions are discussed.

Keywords: argumentative pattern, argument scheme, institutional precondition, legal domain, medical domain, pragmadialectics, political domain, prototypical argumentative pattern, stereotypical argumentative pattern
Article outline
  • 1.Prototypical argumentative patterns
  • 2.Exploitation of the same argument scheme
  • 3.Exploitation of different argument schemes
  • 4.Institutional rationales of argumentative patterns
    • 4.1Prototypical patterns exploiting the same argument scheme
      • Basic patterns of the main argumentation
      • Elaborate patterns of extended argumentation
    • 4.2Prototypical patterns based on differentiated argument schemes
      • Basic patterns of the main argumentation
      • Elaborate patterns of extended argumentation
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.6.1.01eem
References
Andone, C.
(2016) Argumentative patterns in the political domain: The case of European parliamentary committees of inquiry. Argumentation, 30(1), 45–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016a) Bingo! Promising developments in argumentation theory. In F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory (pp. 3–25). Dordrecht etc.: Springer.Google Scholar
(2016b) Identifying argumentative patterns: A vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics. Argumentation, 30(1), 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F.H., & Garssen, B.
(2014) Argumentation by analogy in stereotypical argumentative patterns. In H. Jales Ribeiro (Ed.), Systematic approaches to argument by analogy (pp. 41–56). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F.H., & Grootendorst, R.
(1992) Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Feteris, E.T.
(2016) Prototypical argumentative patterns in a legal context: The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of decisions. Argumentation, 30(1), 61–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) The identification of prototypical argumentative patterns in the justification of judicial decisions. This issue, 44–58.Google Scholar
Garssen, B.
(2016) Problem-solving argumentative patterns in plenary debates of the European Parliament. Argumentation, 30(1), 25–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) The role of the argument by example in legislative debates of the European Parliament. This issue, 27–43.Google Scholar
Snoeck Henkemans, A.F.
(2016) Argumentative patterns in over-the-counter medicine advertisements. Argumentation, 30(1), 81–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Argumentative patterns using symptomatic argumentation in over-the-counter medicine advertisements. This issue, 59–75.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S.E.
(2003) The uses of argument. Updated ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (1st ed. 1958) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagemans, J.H.M.
(2016) Argumentative patterns in scientific explanations. Argumentation, 30(1), 97–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Andone, Corina & Sara Greco
2018. Evading the Burden of Proof in European Union Soft Law Instruments: The Case of Commission Recommendations. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 31:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Lukianova, Ekaterina & Timothy Steffensmeier
2020. “Well, in the case of my mom…”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:3 ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.