Article published In:
Journal of Asian Pacific CommunicationVol. 29:2 (2019) ► pp.281–299
“Doing this kind of linguistics, you do feel like you’re making a difference in the world”
Postgraduate linguistics students learning in the field
Despite the stated importance of fieldwork within the discipline of Linguistics, and the existence of several
texts about fieldwork (Thieberger, 2012; Bowren,
2008; Newman & Ratliff, 2001), there is very little literature
concerning the experience of fieldwork from tertiary students’ perspectives (see Macaulay,
2012). In this article, the work of four New Zealand postgraduate linguistics students working with fourteen Vanuatu
teachers to translate reading materials written in Bislama into seven vernacular languages is documented. Findings indicate that
students were motivated to be involved in the fieldwork by a range of factors including travel, altruism, and commitment to the
communities and their languages; they drew on and, in some cases, clarified many concepts from their undergraduate studies; and
that the fieldwork experiences both allowed them to gain confidence in their linguistic skills and influenced their future studies
in linguistics.
Keywords: linguistics, fieldwork, tertiary students, motivation, New Zealand, Vanuatu
Article outline
- Introduction
- Context
- Method
- Student participants
- Findings
- 1.Students drew on linguistic and nonlinguistic undergraduate work
- 2.Understanding key linguistics concepts for the first time
- 3.Students were motivated by many factors
- 4.Students gained confidence in their skills and identity as linguists
- 5.Experience of fieldwork influenced future studies
- Discussion
- Drawing on undergraduate concepts and understanding key linguistic concepts (1 and 2)
- Motivation and giving back (3)
- Influence on confidence as a linguist and continuing linguistic study (4 and 5)
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
-
References
References (15)
Barnes, M. E. & Magorinsky, P. (2016). What English/Language Arts teacher candidates learn during coursework and practica: A study of three teacher education programmes. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(4), 338–355. 
Bowren, C. (2008). Linguistic Fieldwork. A Practical Guide. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillian.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Sixth Edition. London: Routledge.
Collins, W. (2011). Field methods: Where the rubber meets the road. In K. Kuiper (ed.). Teaching Linguistics. Reflections on practice. London: Equinox. 203–221.
Crowley, T. (2007). Field Linguistics. Oxford, UK: OUP.
Daly, N. & Sharma, S. (2017). Motivation and the reciprocal nature of professional learning between New Zealand teachers working with untrained India teachers, Waikato Journal of Education, 22(1).
Ethnologue Languages of the World (2017). How many languages are there in the world? Retrieved on 30 August 2017 from [URL]
Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., Hyams, N., Amberer, M., Cox, R. & Thornton, R. (2015). An Introduction to Language. Australia and New Zealand Edition. Cengage Learning Australia.
Lynch, J. & Crowley, T. (2001). Languages of Vanuatu: A new survey and bibliography. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Macaulay, M. (2012). Training linguistics students for the realities of fieldwork. In N. Thieberger (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork (pp. 457–472). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ministry of Education. (2012). Vanuatu National Language Policy. Port Vila: Ministry of Education.
Newman, P. (2009). Fieldwork and Field Methods in Linguistics. Language Documentation and Conservation, 3 (1), 113–125.
Newman, P. & Ratliff, M. (2001). Linguistic Fieldwork. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thieberger, N. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork. Oxford: Oxford University Press.