Chineseness as a moving target
Language and identity transformations in the Chinese diaspora in Eindhoven, The Netherlands
The Chinese are one of the earliest established immigrant communities in the Netherlands and they are part of the new ‘superdiversity’ of metropolitan societies around the world, where the relative clarity of previous migration patterns is overlaid by vastly more complex, multilayered and less stable trajectories of movement. Understanding globalization as superdiversity (i.e. as a diversification of diversity instead of a homogenization of global culture in local language and culture practices), this paper aims to disentangle the complexities of being and knowing Chinese in the Netherlands, with respect to internal diversities within Chineseness and its relation to changing Chinese language ideologies.
The empirical starting point for this contribution is an ethnographic project among young people of Chinese heritage living in the Netherlands in and around the setting of a complementary Chinese language school in the city of Eindhoven. The paper focuses on the polycentricity of Chinese, the transformations that occur in the linguistic culinary landscape and the discursive identity construction of Chinese-Dutch youth. Using a multi-site ethnographic methodology data are collected through structured observations, interviews with Chinese community members, linguistic landscaping and online ethnography.
Overall, the paper argues that an ongoing shift along with demographic, economic and political changes in China has altered migration patterns, language ideologies and linguistic landscapes in the Chinese diaspora in the Netherlands. Young people of Chinese heritage articulate a whole repertoire of inhabited and ascribed identities, and they do so by means of a complex display and deployment of the ensemble of linguistic and communicative resources at their disposal.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Sociolinguistic ethnography and metapragmatic discourse
- Transformations in the linguistic culinary landscape
- Transformations in Chinese-Dutch youth identities
- Conclusions
- Notes
-
References
References (25)
References
Agha, A. (2007). Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blackledge, A. & Creese, A. (2010). Multilingualism: A Critical Perspective. London: Continuum.
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blommaert, J. (2006). Language Ideology. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, Second Edition (pp. 510–522). Oxford: Elsevier.
Blommaert, J. (2007). Commentaries: On scope and depth in linguistic ethnography. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(5), 628–688.
Blommaert, J. (2009). Language, asylum, and the national order. Current Anthropology 50(4), 415–442.
Blommaert, J. (2010). The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, superdiversity, and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Blommaert, J. & Dong. (2010). Ethnographic Fieldwork, A Beginner’s Guide. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Blommaert, J. & Maly, I. (2016). Ethnographic linguistic landscape analysis and social change; a case study. In K. Arnaut, J. Blommaert, B. Rampton & M. Spotti (Eds.), Language and Superdiversity (pp. 197–217). New York: Routledge.
Blommaert, J. & B. Rampton. (2016). Language and superdiversity. In K. Arnaut, J. Blommaert, B. Rampton & M. Spotti (Eds.), Language and Superdiversity (pp. 21–48). New York: Routledge.
Burawoy, M. (2003). Revisits: An Outline of a Theory of Reflexive Ethnography. American Sociological Review 681, 645–679.
Carr, E. S. & Lempert, M. (2016). Introduction – Pragmatics of Scale. In E. S. Carr & M. Lempert (Eds.), Scale. Discourse and Dimensions of Social Life (pp. 1–21). Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
CBS (2015). Bevolking; geslacht, leeftijd, burgerlijke staat en regio. Online documents at [URL]
CBS (2018). Bevolking; generatie, geslacht, leeftijd en migratieachtergrond, 1 januari. 14 mei 2018. Online document at [URL]
Chan, C. & Montt Strabucchi, M. (2019). Creating and negotiating “Chineseness” through Chinese restaurants in Santiago, Chile. In J. Banh & H. Liu (Eds.), American Chinese Restaurants: Society, Culture and Consumption (pp. 3–25). New York: Routledge.
Erickson, F. (1997). Some approaches to inquiry in school-community ethnography. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 8(3), 58–69.
Kroskrity, P. V. (Ed.) (2000). Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities and Identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
Li, J. (2016). Chineseness as a Moving Target, Changing Infrastructures of the Chinese Diaspora in the Netherlands. Doctoral Dissertation Tilburg University.
Pennycook, A. (2012). Language and Mobility: Unexpected Places. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Pieke, F. N. & Benton, G. (1998). The Chinese in the Netherlands. In: G. Benton & F. N. Pieke (Eds.), The Chinese in Europe (pp. 125–167). London: Martin’s Press.
Rampton, B. (1998). Speech community. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 15. London: Kings College.
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 231, 193–229.
Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies 301, 1024–1054.
Vertovec, S. (2015). Routledge International Handbook of Diversity Studies. New York: Routledge.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Kroon, Sjaak, Jinling Li & Agnieszka Dreef
2023.
Netherlands: Teachers’ Perspectives and Practices in Chinese and Polish Language and Culture Teaching. In
To Be a Minority Teacher in a Foreign Culture,
► pp. 201 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.