Cover not available
Article published In:
Asian Perspectives on Queer Discourse
Edited by Ke Zhang and Chao Lu
[Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 33:2] 2023
► pp. 137–158

Sexual anti-languages on social media

A Chinese case study

| University of Science and Technology Beijing
| University of Science and Technology Beijing
| Shandong University
The past decades have witnessed a growing preoccupation with gay languages across the world. However, little attention has been devoted to gay language in the Chinese context. To address the gap, this article examined the case of gay language used on a Chinese social media. Specifically speaking, we conducted a corpus-based analysis of sexual anti-languages (SA) on Blued, by following Halliday’s concept of anti-language defined as an extreme case of social dialects and the language of an anti-society. Using a total of 1,744 text-headlines collected from Blued users’ profiles, we identified and grouped Chinese SA into six categorizations. The findings reveal that Blued abounds with SA, each of which has undergone a unique formation process. In the end, we concluded by providing several directions for future research.
Keywords: China, gay language, Blued, sexual anti-languages, formation
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Literature review
  • Method
    • Blued
    • Data collection
    • Analytical procedures
  • Findings
    • Sexual activity related anti-languages
    • Body part related anti-languages
    • Physical appearance related anti-languages
    • Sexual relation related anti-languages
    • Sex role related anti-languages
    • Personality trait related anti-languages
  • Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 June 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00101.lu
References (38)
References
Baker, P. (2002a). Polari: The lost language of gay men. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2002b). Fantabulosa: A dictionary of Polari and gay slang. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2005). Public discourses of gay men. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Fabulosa! The story of Polari, Britain’s secret gay language. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Baker, P., & Paknahad Jaborooty, M. (2017). ‘The sea pulled her skirt up’: The language of same-sex love in Iranian blogs. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 6 (2), 205–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barrett, R. (2017). From drag queens to leathermen: Language, gender, and gay. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boellstorff, T. (2004). Gay language and Indonesia: Registering belonging. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14 (2), 248–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cage, K. (2003). Gayle: the language of Kinks & Queens: A history and dictionary of gay language in South Africa. Johannesburg: Jacana Press.Google Scholar
Chan, A., Lam, A., & Lui, W. (2017). Sexual minorities in Hong Kong: The secret languages of gay men and lesbian women. Unpublished manuscript, School of English, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Dang, T. H. (2013). A preliminary study of gay spoken language in Ho Chi Minh City. Language in India, 13 (9), 448–467.Google Scholar
Dröschel, Y. (2007). Queering language: A love that dare not speak its name comes out of the closet. In H. Sauntson & S. Kyratzis (Eds.), Language, sexualities and desires: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 118–139). UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farrell, R. A. (1972). The argot of the homosexual subculture. Anthropological Linguistics, 14 (3), 97–109.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1976). Anti-Languages. American Anthropologist, 78 (3), 570–584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, S., & Brouwer, D. C. (2018). Negotiating performances of “real” marriage in Chinese queer xinghun . Women’s Studies in Communication, 41 (2), 140–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, G. (1996). Lesbian and gay male language use: A critical review of the literature. American Speech, 71 (1), 49–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnsen, O. R. (2008). “He’s a big old girl!” Negotiation by gender inversion in gay men’s speech. Journal of Homosexuality, 54 (1–2), 150–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, I. (1997). The color of his eyes: Polari and the sisters of perpetual indulgence. In A. Livia & K. Hall (Eds.), Queerly phrased: Language, gender, and sexuality (pp. 85–94). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCormick, T. L. (2009). A queer analysis of the discursive construction of gay identity in Gayle: the language of Kinks and Queens: A history and dictionary of gay language in South Africa (2003). Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 27 (2):149–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, M. (1995). An introduction to language and society (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rojas-Berscia, L. M. (2016). Lóxoro, traces of a contemporary Peruvian genderlect. Borealis, 5 (1), 157–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosales, E. H., & Careterro, M. D. (2019). Stylistics variation: Understanding gay lingo in social perspectives. The Normal Lights, 13 (1), 179–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudwick, S. (2011). Defying a myth: A gay sub–culture in contemporary South Africa. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 20 (2), 90–111.Google Scholar
Rudwick, S., & Msibi, T. (2016). Social and linguistic representations of South African same–sex relations: The case of skesana . In E. Levon & R. B. Mendes (Eds.), Language, sexuality, and power: Studies in intersectional sociolinguistics (pp. 39–59). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, M. (2013). WordSmith Tools. Version 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shalom, C. (1997). That great supermarket of desire: Attributes of the desired other in personal advertisements. In K. Harvey & C. Shalom (Eds.), Language and desire: Encoding sex, romance and intimacy (pp. 186–203). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shiau, H. (2015). Lavender Mandarin in the sites of desire: Situating linguistic performances among Taiwanese gay men. Language & Communication, 42 1, 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sonenschein, D. (1969). The homosexual’s language. Journal of Sex Research, 5 (4), 281–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanley, J. P. (1970). Homosexual slang. American Speech, 45 (1–2), 45–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Susandi, N. K. A., Rusanti, N. P., & Sutrisna, I. P. G. (2018). Gay language in Bali: Sociolinguistics study on homosexual and bisexual men in Bali. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 166 1, 204–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vounchev, B. (2019). The affixoids in the Greek argot Kaliardà. Orbis Linguarum, 17 (1), 50–58.Google Scholar
Wang, S. (2020). Calculating dating goals: Data gaming and algorithmic sociality on Blued, a Chinese gay dating app. Information, Communication & Society, 23 (2), 181–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, A. (2008). The trouble with tongzhi: The politics of labeling among gay and lesbian Hongkongers. Pragmatics, 18 (2), 277–301.Google Scholar
Woodard, R. D. (2001). Writing system. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 16633–16640. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, Y. (2019). Media representations of ‘leftover women’ in China: A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis. Gender and Language, 13 (3), 369–395.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Citlak, Amadeusz & Claude-Hélène Mayer
2024. Negative sentiment – a rhetorical device to reconstruct relationships of power (between tribal-ancient and new populist leadership). International Journal of Cross Cultural Management DOI logo
Zhang, Ke & Huibin Zhuang
2023. Visual Representations of Sexual Minorities in Chinese Newspapers. Journal of Asian and African Studies DOI logo
Zhang, Ke, Huibin Zhuang, Chao Lu & Jingyuan Zhang
2023. Discursive representations of sexual minorities in China’s English-language news media: a corpus-based study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.