Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Asian Pacific Communication
Vol. 34:2 (2024) ► pp.133–155

North Korean propaganda and counterpropaganda on YouTube

Attribute agendas and relationships with network strengths

ORCID logo | The University of Texas at San Antonio
Drawn from attribute agenda setting theory and propaganda theory, this study examined an attribute agenda structure of YouTube videos on North Korean propaganda and its relationship with social media network indicators. A topic modeling analysis with 2,538 video descriptions clustered bulk documents into four attribute agendas: proximity, prominence, conflicts, and common interest. Proximity related North Korean propaganda to its main stakeholders such as China. Prominence was concerned with the relationship between North Korea and business. Conflict showcased North Korea’s military power as a confronting mode against South Korea. Common interest covered daily attractions in North Korea, including music and tourism. A positive relationship between conflict and all network strength indicators implies that YouTube descriptions of North Korea are related to military confrontations, showing belligerence as a notable attribute. Four topics and their linkage with network ties suggest that, despite North Korea’s efforts to build a soft image via YouTube, influencers set conflicts as key agenda attributes.
Keywords: attribute agenda setting, propaganda, YouTube, North Korea, network strengths
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Literature review
    • North Korea and social media
    • Attribute agenda setting
    • Propaganda and counterpropaganda attributes
    • Propaganda, counterpropaganda, and network strengths
  • Research questions
  • Method
    • Data collection
    • Topic modeling procedures
    • Measurements
      • Topics
      • Network strengths
    • Analysis plan
  • Findings
  • Discussion
  • Theoretical and practical implications
  • Study limitations and suggestions for future research
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 October 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00110.kan
References (58)
References
Abuín-Penas, J. (2023). Fact-checking en Youtube en España: Tipología de verificaciones en vídeo en 2021. Index.Comunicacion, 13 (1), 247–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ali Mohammed, S. H., & McCombs, M. (2021). Intermedia agenda setting or international news flow? Cross-lagged comparison of elite international newspapers. International Journal of Communication (19328036), 151, 3948–3969.Google Scholar
Ali, K., & Zain-ul-abdin, K. (2021). Post-truth propaganda: heuristic processing of political fake news on Facebook during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 49 (1), 109–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arendt, F., & Brantner, C. (2015). Toward an implicit cognition account of attribute agenda setting. International Journal of Communication (19328036), 91, 2735–2756.Google Scholar
Ariel, Y., Elishar Malka, V., Weimann Saks, D., & Avidar, R. (2021). “If you follow me, I might (mis)lead you”: Following prime ministerial candidates on social networks as a predictor of the public agenda during an election campaign. Agenda Setting Journal: Theory, Practice, Critique, 5 (2), 266–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aruguete, N. (2021). Activación de encuadres en red. Un modelo para repensar la circulación de sentidos en el nuevo entorno mediático. El Profesional de La Información, 30 (2), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benecke, D. R., & Oksiutycz, A. (2015). Changing conversation and dialogue through LeadSA: An example of public relations activism in South Africa. Public Relations Review, 41 (5), 816–824. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Besova, A. A., & Cooley, S. C. (2009). Foreign news and public opinion: Attribute agenda-setting theory revisited. Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies (University of Wisconsin Press), 30 (2), 219–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bevan, J. (2010). Welcome to Panmunjeom: encounters with the North in contemporary South Korean cinema. New Cinemas: Journal of Contemporary Film, 8 (1), 45–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Black, J. (2001). Semantics and ethics of propaganda. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 16 (2–3), 121–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blair, S. J., Bi, Y., & Mulvenna, M. D. (2020). Aggregated topic models for increasing social media topic coherence. Applied Intelligence, 50 1, 138–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyd-Graber, J., Mimno, D., & Newman, D. (2014). Care and feeding of topic models: Problems, diagnostics, and improvements. In E. M. Airoldi, D. M. Blei, E. A. Erosheva, & S. E. Fienberg (Eds.). Handbook of mixed membership models and their applications (pp. 225–254). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Brandt, J., & Wirtschafter, V. (2022, July 6). How China uses search engines to spread propaganda. Stream. Retrieved from [URL]
Carazo-Barrantes, C. (2021). Agenda-setting in a social media age: Exploring new methodological approaches. Agenda Setting Journal: Theory, Practice, Critique, 5 (1), 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, C. & McCombs, M. (2003). Agenda setting effects of business news on the public’s images and opinions of major corporations. Corporate Reputation Review, 161, 36–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dieng, A. B., Ruiz, F. J. R., & Blei, D. M. (2020). Topic modeling in embedding spaces. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8 1, 439–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diez-Gracia, A., & Sánchez-García, P. (2022). The news gap in the “triple digital agenda”: The different interests of media, audience and networks. Communication & Society, 35 (1), 63–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franke, M., & Van Rooij, R. (2015). Strategies of persuasion, manipulation and propaganda: Psychological and social aspects. In van Benthem, J. S. Ghosh, & R. Verbrugge (Eds.), Models of strategic reasoning (pp. 255–291). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frisch, N., Belair-Gagnon, V., & Agur, C. (2018). Media capture with Chinese characteristics: Changing patterns in Hong Kong’s news media system. Journalism, 19 (8), 1165–1181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geigenberger, L. (2023, May 4). North Korea ranks dead last in latest World Press Freedom Index. Daily NK. Retrieved from [URL], last access June 1, 2024.
Gill, M. (2012). North Korea: The role of propaganda in the sustainability of the Kim regime (master’s thesis, Georgetown University).
Ghanem, S. (1997). Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting. In McCombs, M., D. L. Shaw, & D. Weaver (Eds.). Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory (pp. 3–14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Güven, E. (2019). The Juche System and the DPR Korea media as official mouthpiece of the Kim Family: Pyongyang Times newspaper website analysis. Global Media Journal: Turkish Edition, 10 (19), 194–215.Google Scholar
Hacek, J. (2022). An overview of war propaganda and robotrolling. Otazky Zurnalistiky, 65 (1/2), 41–48.Google Scholar
Himelboim, I., Xiao, X., Lee, D. K. L., Wang, M. Y., & Borah, P. (2020). A social networks approach to understanding vaccine conversations on Twitter: Network clusters, sentiment, and certainty in HPV social networks. Health Communication, 35 (5), 607–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isoaho, K., Gritsenko, D., & Mäkelä, E. (2021). Topic modeling and text analysis for qualitative policy research. Policy Studies Journal, 49 (1), 300–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jang, W. Y., Hong, J., & Frederick, E. (2015). The framing of the North Korean Six-Party Talks by Chinese and North Korean news agencies: Communist propaganda and national interests. Media International Australia 154 (8/1/07–Current), 42–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jowett, G. S., & O’Donnell, V. (2018). Propaganda and persuasion (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2011). How intercultural communication theory informs public relations practice in global settings. In N. Bardhan, & C. K. Weaver (Eds.), Public relations in global cultural contexts. Multi-paradigmatic perspectives (pp. 50–77). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kim, H. (2023, June 27). YouTube removes North Korean ‘vloggers’ after South Korea blocks accounts. Reuters. Retrieved from [URL], last access June 2, 2024.
Li, M. (2018). Intermedia attribute agenda setting in the context of issue-focused media events: Caitlyn Jenner and transgender reporting. Journalism Practice, 12 (1), 56–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, Y. J. (2021). Kim Jong-un’s image makeover in global public relations: The Singapore Summit targeting international media and global audience. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 23 1, 1–17.Google Scholar
Long, Q., & Shao, L. (2023). Beyond propaganda: The changing journalistic practices of China’s party press in the digital era. Journalism Practice, 17 (4), 799–813. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makhortykh, M., & Sydorova, M. (2017). Social media and visual framing of the conflict in Eastern Ukraine. Media, War & Conflict, 10 (3), 359–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Monika, J. (2021). Analysis of United States propaganda against North Korea through the film The Interview. International Journal on Social Science, Economics and Art, 11 (1), 33–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moon, M. (2018). Manufacturing consent? The role of the international news on the Korean Peninsula. Global Media & Communication, 14 (3), 265–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nowacki, L. (2021). Proximity hype as a frame attribute in the reporting on North Korea: Frame strength in competitive contexts. Global Media & Communication, 17 (3), 345–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oleinik, A., & Paniotto, V. (2023). War propaganda unfolded: Comparative effectiveness of propaganda and counterpropaganda in Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. International Journal of Communication 171, 7265–7290.Google Scholar
Park, H., Biddix, J. P., & Park, H. W. (2021). Discussion, news information, and research sharing on social media at the onset of Covid-19. El Profesional de La Información 30 (4), 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, H. W., & Lim, Y. S. (2020). Do North Korean social media show signs of change?: An examination of a YouTube channel using qualitative tagging and social network analysis. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia 19 (1), 123–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pratkanis, A. R., & Aronson, E. (2001). Age of propaganda: The everyday use and abuse of persuasion. New York, NY: Holt Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Raun, T. (2016). Out online. Trans self-representation and community building on YouTube. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rospitasari, M. (2021). YouTube as alternative media for digital activism in documentary film creative industry. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 5 (3), 665–692. Retrieved from [URL], last access September 3, 2024. DOI logo
Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication 49 (1), 103–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, J. B., Rieger, D., Rutkowski, O., & Ernst, J. (2018). Counter-messages as prevention or promotion of extremism?! The potential role of YouTube: Recommendation algorithms. Journal of Communication, 68 (4), 780–808. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sixto-García, J., Rodríguez-Vázquez, A. I., & Soengas-Pérez, X. (2022). Co-creation in North American and European digital native media: Web, social networks and offline spaces. Journalism, 23 (9), 1955–1974. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Social Media Research Foundation. (2023). Overall metrics defined. Social Media Research Foundation. Retrieved from [URL], last access September 3, 2024.
Swanberg, S. E. (2019). Psychological armor: The science news-letter warns against propaganda (1926–1965). Journalism Studies, 20 (13), 1883–1902. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. M., Hintz, E. A., & Duerringer, C. M. (2022). Setting the agenda: Beyond discourse dependence and a dependence on discourse. Journal of Family Communication, 22 (2), 175–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walter, D., Ophir, Y., Pruden, M., & Golan, G. (2022). Watching the whole world: The media framing of foreign countries in US news and its antecedents. Journalism Studies, 23 (15), 1994–2014. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, S., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Xenos, M. A. (2022). The science of YouTube: What factors influence user engagement with online science videos?. PloS one, 17 (5), e0267697. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yeung, J., & Bae, G. (2023, February 5). They eat ice cream and read ‘Harry Potter,’ but these North Korean YouTubers aren’t what they seem. CNN. Retrieved from [URL], last access September 3, 2024.
Yoon, S. (2020). Mobile Media and Its Impacts on Social Change and Human Rights in North Korea. International Journal of Communication (19328036), 141, 1480–1497.Google Scholar
Zhao, X., & Wang, X. (2023). Dynamics of networked framing: Automated frame analysis of government media and the public on Weibo with pandemic big data. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 100 (1), 100–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhou, A. (2019). Bring publics back into networked public relations research: A dual-projection approach for network ecology. Public Relations Review, 45 (4), N.PAG. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwirko, C. (2022, June 20). Harry Potter-loving North Korean vlogger comes from elite family close to Kims. NK News. Retrieved from [URL]
Zyglidopoulos, S., Symeou, P. C., Bantimaroudis, P., & Kampanellou, E. (2012). Cultural agenda setting: Media attributes and public attention of Greek museums. Communication Research, 39 (4), 480–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar