Article published In:
Journal of Asian Pacific Communication
Vol. 13:2 (2003) ► pp.269288
Cited by (7)

Cited by 7 other publications

Campbell, Colin William & Barney Batista
2023. To peer or not to peer: A controlled peer-editing intervention measuring writing self-efficacy in South Korean higher education. International Journal of Educational Research Open 4  pp. 100218 ff. DOI logo
Lam, Sandra Tsui Eu
2021. A web-based feedback platform for peer and teacher feedback on writing: An Activity Theory perspective. Computers and Composition 62  pp. 102666 ff. DOI logo
Lu, Yichen & D. Ryan Berg
2019. Taiwanese University Students’ Ideal L2 Selves and Autonomy: Does High School Program Make a Difference?. International Journal of Educational Methodology 5:4  pp. 567 ff. DOI logo
Sánchez‐Naranjo, Jeannette
2019. Peer review and training: Pathways to quality and value in second language writing. Foreign Language Annals 52:3  pp. 612 ff. DOI logo
Wei, Wei & Sammy King Fai Hui
2019. Evaluating teacher performance in language learning classes: the gap between students and department administrators. Teachers and Teaching 25:4  pp. 486 ff. DOI logo
Chong, Ivan
2017. How students' ability levels influence the relevance and accuracy of their feedback to peers: A case study. Assessing Writing 31  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Lundstrom, Kristi & Wendy Baker
2009. To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 18:1  pp. 30 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.