Article published In:
Journal of Asian Pacific Communication
Vol. 13:2 (2003) ► pp.269288
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Campbell, Colin William & Barney Batista
2023. To peer or not to peer: A controlled peer-editing intervention measuring writing self-efficacy in South Korean higher education. International Journal of Educational Research Open 4  pp. 100218 ff. DOI logo
Lam, Sandra Tsui Eu
2021. A web-based feedback platform for peer and teacher feedback on writing: An Activity Theory perspective. Computers and Composition 62  pp. 102666 ff. DOI logo
Lu, Yichen & D. Ryan Berg
2019. Taiwanese University Students’ Ideal L2 Selves and Autonomy: Does High School Program Make a Difference?. International Journal of Educational Methodology 5:4  pp. 567 ff. DOI logo
Sánchez‐Naranjo, Jeannette
2019. Peer review and training: Pathways to quality and value in second language writing. Foreign Language Annals 52:3  pp. 612 ff. DOI logo
Wei, Wei & Sammy King Fai Hui
2019. Evaluating teacher performance in language learning classes: the gap between students and department administrators. Teachers and Teaching 25:4  pp. 486 ff. DOI logo
Chong, Ivan
2017. How students' ability levels influence the relevance and accuracy of their feedback to peers: A case study. Assessing Writing 31  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Lundstrom, Kristi & Wendy Baker
2009. To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 18:1  pp. 30 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.