Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Asian Pacific Communication
Vol. 24:1 (2014) ► pp.81–93

Authorship, plagiarism and cooperation in higher education

Conclusions from experiences with Asian cultures and learning environments

| School of International Studies, Kanazawa University, Japan
One leading question of this paper is, whether the postulate of true authorship can be generally applied to all learning and research environments in higher education. Experience shows at least that this postulate has no global reach. I am referring to the cultures and traditions in East Asia where other concepts of authorship and intellectual property rights exist. However, Western standards of ethical behaviour in science demand academic integrity everywhere in order to fight the violation of intellectual property and copy rights known as plagiarism and piracy. This generalized claim does not consider the diversity of epistemic traditions which can be also found in Western history. Moreover, it seems to ignore the collaborative background of knowledge construction. This paper aims to contribute to the ethical discussions with another than a moralistic view at the problem. In the first place it has to be asked how the idea of authorship and its protection by intellectual property laws became crucial. It will be necessary to focus on the historical background of intellectual property and how it gained importance in the West and in the East. Findings regarding differences in the adoption of this idea due to diversity in Asian culture and tradition have to be discussed. Experiences in the learning environment of East Asian higher education institutions will be confronted with the general demand for authentic authorship in academia. It has to be asked if the function of protected intellectual property opposes cooperative structures in higher education. The discussion on educational issues leads to the question what role protected authorship plays today in academic research.
Keywords: plagiarism, intellectual property rights, authorship, open access, originality, culture, cooperation, learning environment
Published online: 18 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.24.1.05bal
References (40)
Baker, V.L., Meghan, J.P., & Blair, F. (2013). Process challenges and learning-based interactions in stage2 of doctoral education: Implications from two applied social science fields. The Journal of Higher Education , 4531, 460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barmeyer, C.I. (2004). Learning styles and their impact on cross-cultural training: An international comparison in France, Germany and Quebec. International Journal of Intercultural Relations , 28(6), 577–594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories . Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, K. (2011). Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft. The geopolitics of academic plagiarism. Plagiate-Gefahr für die Wissenschaft? In T. Rommel (Ed.), Plagiate - Gefahr für die Wissenschaft? (pp. 53–69). Berlin: Lit-Verl.Google Scholar
Buranen, L. (1999). But I wasn’t cheating. Plagiarism and cross-cultural mythology. In L. Buranen & A.M. Roy (Eds.), Perspectives on plagiarism and intellectual property in a postmodern world (pp. 63–74). State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Davies, R.J., & Ikeno, O. (2002). The Japanese mind. Understanding contemporary Japanese Culture . Tuttle Publishing.Google Scholar
Deckert, G. (1993). Perspectives on plagiarism from ESL students in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing , 2(2), 131–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryden, L.M. (1999). A distant mirror or through the looking glass? Plagiarism and intellectual property in Japanese education. In L. Buranen & A.M. Roy (Eds.), Perspectives on plagiarism and intellectual property in a postmodern world (pp. 75–86). State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ganea, P. (2000). Verwandte Schutzrechte im Urheberrecht der Länder Japan, China und Deutschland. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures . London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Gernet, J. (1988). Die chinesische Welt . Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 426.Google Scholar
Goldstein, P. (2003). Copyright’s highway: From Gutenberg to the celestial jukebox (Rev. ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Guetzkow, J., Lamond, M., & Mallard, G. (2004). What is originality in the humanities and social sciences? American Sociological Review , 69(2), 190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J., Allinson, C.W. (1988). Cultural differences in the learning styles of managers. Management International Review , 28(3), 75–80.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1983). Tradition in Science . New York.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publ.Google Scholar
. (1998). Think locally, act globally: Cultural constraints in personnel management. Management International Review , 381, 7–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House R.J., Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P.W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The globe study of 62 societies . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
von Humboldt, W. (1810). Über die innere und äußere Organisation der höheren wissenschaflichen Anstalten in Berlin. In G. Schriften (Ed.), Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Vol. 101, 250 f). Berlin.Google Scholar
Iser, W. (1994). Die Appellstruktur der Texte. In R. Warning (Ed.), Rezeptionsästhetik (pp. 228–252). Stuttgart: UTB.Google Scholar
Karchow, R. (2006). Das chinesische Urheberrecht . Saarbrücken: VDM.Google Scholar
Katsumoto, M. (1975). Das neue japanische Urheberrechtsgesetz/The new Japanese Copyright Law. Internationale Gesellschaft für Urheberrecht, Schriftenreihe , 521.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (2011). Science in a democratic society . Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books, Chapter 8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, B.M. (2000). The Chinese value survey. An interpretation of value scales and consideration of some preliminary results. International Educational Journal , 1(2).Google Scholar
McVeigh, B.J. (2002). Japanese higher education as myth . New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Merton, R.K. (1942). Science and technology in a democratic order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology , 11, 115–126.Google Scholar
. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review , 221, 635–659. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mijatovic, I. (2006). Kreativität als Voraussetzung für den urheberrechtlichen Schutz von Geisteserzeugnissen . Bern: Stämpfli.Google Scholar
Müller, R. (2012). Collaborating in life science research groups: The question of authorship. Higher Education Policy , 251, 289–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pecorari, D. (2008). Academic writing and plagiarism. A linguistic analyses . London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (1994). The complex context of plagiarism: A reply to Deckert. Journal of Second Language Writing , 3(3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Porsche-Ludwig, M., & Chen, F. (2000). Akademische Plagiate in China. In P. Ganea (Ed.), Verwandte Schutzrechte im Urheberrecht der Länder Japan, China und Deutschland . München: Beck.Google Scholar
Ravetz, S. (2012). Keep Standards high: As models of authorship and collaboration change in the digital age, we must rely on trust to filter the products of research. Nature , 481(7379), 25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rieble, V. (2010). Das Wissenschaftsplagiat. Vom Versagen eines Systems . Frankfurt/M: Vitorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Rinnert, C., & Kobayashi, H. Borrowing words and ideas. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication , 15(1), 31–56.
Ryan, J., & Louie, K. (2007). False dichotomy? Western and confucian concepts of scholarship and learning. Educational Philosophy and Theorie , 39(4), 404–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R. (1995). Plagiarism and ideology: Identity in intercultural discourse. Language in Society , 24(1), 1f. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutherland-Smith, W. (2008). Plagiarism, the internet and student learning. Improving academic integrity . New York: Routledge, Chapter 4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamazaki, Y. (2005). Learning styles and typologies of cultural differences: A theoretical and empirical comparison. International Journal of Intercultural Relations , 29(5), 521–548. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, P.K.(2008). Intellectual property, foreign direct Investment and the China exception. In R.C. Bird & S.C. Jain (Eds.), The global challenge of intellectual property rights (pp. 153–173). Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Horta, Hugo & Ka-Ho Mok
2020. Challenges to research systems, academic research and knowledge production in East Asia: learning from the past to inform future policy. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 42:2 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.