Article published In:
Anxiety, Insecurity, and Border Crossing: Language Contact in a Globalizing WorldEdited by Mie Hiramoto and Joseph Sung-Yul Park
[Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 24:2] 2014
► pp. 221–240
Edited by Mie Hiramoto and Joseph Sung-Yul Park
[Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 24:2] 2014
► pp. 221–240
Linguistic insecurity and reproduction of the Malay community’s peripherality in Singapore
Singapore’s thriving globalized economy, founded on the ideology of meritocracy and conservative aversion to welfare provision, privileges industriousness, talent and competence, which works to justify the socioeconomic peripherality of a segment of the Malay community. These Malays are encouraged to acquire entrepreneurial skills through programmes run by privatized self-help organizations to attain social mobility. But privileging of Standard English as a necessary linguistic and cultural resource in such programmes results in linguistic insecurity, and the programme participants’ attempt to use English backfires due to their limited competence in the language. The analysis in this paper focuses on the anxieties involved in the positioning strategies that Malay participants employed in interviews and interactions during a micro-business training programme. Participants’ discursive strategies of adequation and distinction (Bucholtz and Hall, 2005) show how their linguistic insecurity about English reflects the tension between the prevailing negative branding of Malays as underachievers and their resistance towards it.
References (28)
Agha, A. (2005). Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 151, 38–59. 
. (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alsagoff, L. (2010). English in Singapore: culture, capital and identity in linguistic variation. World Englishes, 291, 336–348.
Beardsmore, H.B. (1986). Bilingualism: Basic principles. 2nd ed. Avon: Multilingual Matters.
Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bokhorst-Heng, W., & Caleon, I.S. (2009). The language attitudes of bilingual youth in multilingual Singapore. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 301, 235–251.
Bourdieu, P. (1992). Language and symbolic power (Paperback edition). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2004). Language and identity. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 369–394). Malden: Blackwell.
. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 71, 585–614.
Du Bois, J. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 139–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jaffe, A. (2009). Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance. In A. Jaffe, (Ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives (pp.3–28). New York: Oxford University Press.
Labov, W. (2006). The social stratification of English in New York city. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Liow, E.D. (2012). The neoliberal-developmental state: Singapore as case-study. Critical Sociology, 381, 241–264.
Moore, R.Q. (2000). Multiracialism and meritocracy: Singapore’s approach to race and inequality. Review of Social Economy, 581, 339–360.
Mutalib, H. (2012). Singapore Malays. London & New York: Oxford University Press.
Pakir, A. (1991). The range and depth of English-knowing bilinguals in Singapore. World Englishes, 101, 167–179.
Park, J. S-Y. (2011). The promise of English: Linguistic capital and the neoliberal worker in the South Korean job market. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 141, 443–455.
. (2014). Figures of personhood. Paper presented at the AAA-AAAL Colloquium “Conceptualizing Linguistic Difference: Perspectives from Linguistic Anthropology”, AAAL Annual Meeting
, Portland, Oregon.
Park, J. S-Y., & Wee, L. (2012). Markets of English: Linguistic capital and language policy in a globalizing world. New York & London: Routledge.
Platt, J.T. (1978). Sociolects and their Pedagogical Implications. RELC Journal, 91, 28–38.
Siddique, S. (2001). Islam and civil society: A case study from Singapore. In N. Mitsuo, S. Siddique, & O.F. Bajunid (Eds.), Islam and civil society in Southeast Asia (pp.135–146). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Singapore Department of Statistics. (2010a). Census of population 2010 statistical release 1: Demographic characteristics, education, language and religion.
. (2010b). Census of population 2010 statistical release 2: Households and housing.
Tan, K.P. (2008). Meritocracy and Elitism in a Global City: Ideological shifts in Singapore. International Political Science Review, 211, 7–27.
Teo, Y. (2011). Neoliberal morality in Singapore: How family policies make state and society. Abingdon: Routledge.
The Straits Times. (July 12, 2012). Editorial Review. Available on [URL] (Accessed May, 27, 2013).
Thomason, S.G., & Everett, D.L. (2005). Pronoun borrowing. Berkeley linguistic society, 271, 301–315.
Wee, L. (2003). Linguistic instrumentalism in Singapore. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 241, 211–224.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Mirvahedi, Seyed Hadi
2024. What can interactional sociolinguistics bring to the family language policy research table? The case of a Malay family in Singapore. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 45:2 ► pp. 257 ff. 
Mirvahedi, Seyed Hadi & Francesco Cavallaro
2020. Siblings' play and language shift to English in a Malay‐English bilingual family in Singapore. World Englishes 39:1 ► pp. 183 ff.
Del Percio, Alfonso
2018. Engineering commodifiable workers: language, migration and the governmentality of the self. Language Policy 17:2 ► pp. 239 ff.
De Costa, Peter I.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.