International media framing
A case study of Korean-Japanese territorial disputes
The relationship between Japan and South Korea has been particularly tumultuous in recent years. One of the major sources of unrest is the unresolved Dokdo (a.k.a. Takeshima) issue. This study examines the framing of the issue by four international news agencies. It explores whether international news agencies from different countries would frame the issue differently. Results suggest that the news agencies frame the issue differently depending on the agencies’ country of origin.
Article outline
- The Dokdo controversy
- Literature review
- The concept of news frames
- Issue packages and frames
- Government propaganda’s influence on news frames
- Framing of international news
- Research questions
- Method
- Sample
- Coding instrument
- Procedure
- Intercoder reliability
- Results
- Conclusion and discussions
-
References
References (57)
References
Akhavan-Majid, R., & Ramaprasad, J. (1998). Framing and ideology: A comparative analysis of U.S. and Chinese newspaper coverage of the Fourth United Nations Conference on Women and the NGO forum. Mass Communication & Society, 1(2/3), 131–152.
Akhavan-Majid, R., & Ramaprasad, J. (2000). Framing Beijing: Dominant ideological influences on the American press coverage of the Fourth UN conference on Women and the NGO forum. Gazette, the International Journal for Communication Studies, 62(1), 45–59.
Bardhan, N. (2001). Transnational AIDS-HIV news narratives: A critical exploration of overarching frames. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 283–309.
Becker, S. (1984). Marxist approaches to media studies: The British experience. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1(1), 66–80.
Brewer, P. R. (2006). National interest frames and public opinion about world affairs. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(4), 89–102.
Bridges, B. (1993). Japan and Korea in the 1990s: From antagonism to adjustment, Aldershot, England: Bookfield, Vermont, Edward Elgar.
Camaj, L. (2010). Media framing through stages of a political discourse: International news agencies’ coverage of Kosovo’s status negotiations. International Communication Gazette, 72(7), 635–653.
Chang, K. & Lee, T. (2010). International news determinants in the US media. In G. Golan, T. Johnson and W. Wanta (Eds.), International Media Communication in a Global Age (pp. 71–88). Florence, USA: Routledge.
Chang, T. & Lin, F. (2014). From propaganda to public diplomacy: Assessing China’s international practice and its image, 1950–2009. Public Relations Review, 401, 450–458.
Choi, S. (2005). The politics of the Dokdo issue. Journal of East Asian Studies, 51, 465–494.
Edelman, M. (1993). Contestable categories and public opinion. Political Communication, 10(3), 231–242.
Entman, R. M. (1991). Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6–27.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
Entman, R. M. (2008). Theorizing mediated public diplomacy: The U.S. case. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(2), 87–102.
Furukawa, K. (2011). Bordering Japan: Towards a comprehensive perspective. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 26(3), 297–314.
Gamson, W. A. (1989). News as framing: Comments on Graber. American Behavioral Scientist, 33(2), 157–161.
Gamson, W. A. (2003). Bystanders, public opinion, and the media. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule and H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 242–261). Wiley-Blackwell.
Gamson, W. A., & Lasch, K. E. (1983). The political culture of social welfare policy. In S. E. Spiro and E. Yuchman-Yaar (Eds.), Evaluating the Welfare State: Social and Political Perspectives (pp. 397–415). NY: Academic Press.
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. Political Sociology, 31, 137–177
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.
Giffard, C. A., & Leuven, N. V. (2008). Five views on development: How news agencies cover the UN millennium development goals. Journal of Global Mass Communication, 1(1/2), 22–40.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Gunaratne, S. A., & Kim, S. (2000). North Korea. In S. A. Gunaratne (Eds.), Handbook of the Media in Asia (pp. 586–610). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Hall, S. (1977). Culture, the media, and the ideological effects. In J. Curran, M. Gurevitch and J. Wollacott (Eds.), Mass communication and society (pp. 315–48). Beverly Hills. CA: Sage.
Han, G. (2007). Mainland China frames Taiwan: How China’s news websites covered Taiwan’s 2004 presidential election. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(1), 40–57.
Hara, K. (2006). Cold War frontiers in the Asia-Pacific: Divided territories in the San Francisco System. Routledge.
Hawdon, J., Agnich, L. E., & Ryan, J. (2014). Media framing of a tragedy: A content analysis of print media coverage of the Virginia Tech tragedy. Traumatology, 20(3), 199–208.
Herman, E., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon.
Holt, L. F., & Major, L. H. (2010). Frame and blame: An analysis of how national and local newspapers framed the Jena 6 controversy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(3/4), 582–597.
Hong, J. (2011). From the world’s largest propaganda machine to a multi-functional news service: The transformation of Xinhua News Service since 1978. Journal of Political Communication, 28(3), 377–393.
Hyun, D. (Ed.). (2008). The historical perceptions of Korea and Japan: Its origins and points of the issues concerning Dokdo/Takeshima, Yasukuni Shrine, Comfort Women, and Textbooks. Seoul: Nanam.
Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issue. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Iyengar, S. (1992). Framing responsibility for political issue: The case of poverty. Political Behavior, 12(1), 19–40.
Jang, W. (2013). News as propaganda: A comparative analysis of US and Korean press coverage of the Six-Party Talks, 2003–2007. International Communication Gazette, 75(2), 188–204.
Jang, W., Hong, J., & Frederick, E. (2015). The framing of the North Korean Six-Party Talks by Chinese and North Korean news agencies: Communist propaganda and national interests. Media International Australia, 1541, 42–52.
Jowett, G. S., & O’Donnell, V. (1992). Propaganda and Persuasion. London: Sage.
Lee, C., & Yang, J. (1996). Foreign news and national interest: Comparing U.S. and Japanese coverage of a Chinese student movement. International Communication Gazette, 56(1), 1–18.
Li, X., & Liu, X. (2010). Framing and coverage of the same-sex marriage in U.S. newspapers. The Howard Journal of Communication, 211, 72–91.
Massey, B. L. (2000). How three Southeast-Asian newspapers framed ‘the Haze’ of 1997–98. Asian Journal of Communication, 10(1): 72–94.
McGinty, E. E., Webster, D. W., Jarlenski, M., & Barry, C. L. (2014). News media framing of serious mental illness and gun violence in the United States, 1997–2012. American Journal of Public Health, 104(3), 406–413.
Mohr, J. W. (1998). Measuring meaning structures. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 345–370.
Murphy, P. (2001). Affiliation bias and expert disagreement in framing the nicotine addition debate. Science, Technology & Human Values, 26(3), 278–299.
Nohrstedt, S. A., Kaitatzi-Whitlock, S., Ottosen, R., & Riegert, K. (2000). From the Persian Gulf to Kosovo: War journalism and propaganda. European Journal of Communication, 15(3), 383–404.
Ostini, J., & Fung, A. H. (2002). Beyond the four theories of the press: A new model of national media systems. Mass Communication & Society, 5(1), 41–56.
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55–75.
Popping, R. (2000). Computer-assisted text analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Rantanen, T. (1995). News agencies in Post-Communist Russia: From state monopoly to state dominance. European Journal of Communication, 10(2), 207–220.
Shoemaker, P. J., Eichholz, M., Kim, E., & Wrigley, B. (2001). Individual and routine forces in gatekeeping. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(2), 233–246.
Simmons, G. (2014). Russian public diplomacy in the 21st Century: Structure, means and message. Public Relations Review, 401, 440–449.
Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109.
Snow, N., & Taylor, P. M. (2006). The revival of the propaganda state: US propaganda at home and abroad since 9/11. The International Communication Gazette, 68(5–6), 389–407.
Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
Wang, M. (1991). Who is dominating whose ideology? New York Times reporting on China. Asian Journal of Communication, 2(1), 51–69.
Woelfel, J. (1998). Catpac user’s manual (Catpac II, Version 2.0). New York: Rah Press.
Yoon, Y., & Yi, G. (2002). Media management of international conflict: A comparative analysis of news coverage of Dokdo Island. Korea Journal, 42(4), 264–297.
Youm, K. (1991). Press laws in North Korea. Asian Journal of Communication, 2(1), 70–86.