An EMI lecturer’s assessment practices with engineering laboratory reports
EMI assessment research designed to compare academic achievement in EMI and L1-medium courses aims to examine
language and content learning outcomes (
Dafouz & Camacho-Miñano, 2016;
Hernández-Nanclares & Jiménez-Munoz, 2015;
Yang,
2015). However, these studies provide little insight into learning processes. A genre analysis perspective, in
contrast, can offer a deeper understanding of the development of student disciplinary literacy. Based on genre analysis studies on
student writing (
Nesi & Gardner, 2012;
Parkinson, 2017;
Swales, 1990), we aim to describe the written genre in
student laboratory reports from an EMI course on a Mechanical Engineering degree programme. Seven students’ laboratory reports as
well as the lecturer’s instructions, the assessment rubric, and written feedback were examined using genre analysis. This case
study contributes to the emerging literature on assessment in EMI by foregrounding the advantages of genre analysis as an
analytical methodology and shedding light on students’ development of literacy in disciplinary writing.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Background
- Studies in EMI assessment
- Disciplinary literacy and genre
- Methodology
- The context and data collection process
- Data analysis
- Findings
- The educational purpose of the laboratory practical
- Analysis of the IMRD macro-structure
- Analysis of moves and steps
- Analysis of verb tense
- Analysis of written feedback
- Discussion and conclusions
- Acknowledgements
-
References
References (31)
References
Aguilar, M., & Muñoz, C. (2014). The effect of proficiency on CLIL benefits in Engineering students in Spain. International Journal of Applied Linguistics,
24
1, 1–18.
Airey, J. (2011). The disciplinary literacy discussion matrix: A heuristic tool for initiating collaboration in higher education. Across the Disciplines,
8
(3), 1–9.
Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2009). A disciplinary discourse perspective on university science learning: Achieving fluency in a critical constellation of modes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
46
(1), 27–49.
Aizawa, I., Rose, H., Thompson, G., & Curle, S. (2020). Beyond the threshold: Exploring English language proficiency and linguistic challenges experienced by Japanese students in an English Medium Instruction programme. Language Teaching Research, 1–25.
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). What is the problem with feedback? In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education (pp. 1–10). Routledge.
Breeze, R., & Dafouz, E. (2017). Constructing complex cognitive discourse functions in higher education: An exploratory study of exam answers in Spanish- and English-medium instruction settings. System,
70
1, 81–91.
Chell, G., Mikkilä-Erdmann, M., Iiskala, T. & Dillon, A. (2021). A comparative study of academic literacy in English medium instruction programs in UAE and Finland. Issues in Educational Research,
31
(1), 56–75. [URL]
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
Costa, F., & Mariotti, C. (2017). Students’ outcomes in English-medium instruction: Is there any difference related to discipline? L’Analisi Linguistica e Letteraria,
25
1, 361–371. [URL]
Dafouz, E., & Camacho-Miñano, M. M. (2016). Exploring the impact of English-medium instruction on university student academic achievement: The case of accounting. English for Specific Purposes,
44
1, 57–67.
Gardner, S., & Holmes, J. (2010). From section headings to assignment macrostructures in undergraduate student writing. In E. Swain (Ed.), Thresholds and potentialities of systemic functional linguistics: Multilingual, multimodal and other specialised discourses (pp. 268–290). EUT.
Harrington, K. (2011). The roles of assessment in ‘Writing in the Disciplines’. In M. Deane & P. O’Neill (Eds.), Writing in the disciplines (pp. 48–62). Palgrave Macmillan.
Hernández-Nanclares, N., & Jiménez-Munoz, A. (2015). English as a medium of instruction: Evidence for language and content targets in bilingual education in economics. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism,
20
(7), 883–896.
Hyland, K. (2013). ESP and writing. In. B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), Handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 95–114). Blackwell.
Johns, A. (2008). Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest. Language Teaching,
41
(2), 237–252.
Lei, J., & Hu, G. (2014). Is English-medium instruction effective in improving Chinese undergraduate students’ English competence? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching,
52
(2), 99–126.
Li, N., & Wu, J. (2018). Exploring assessment for learning practices in the EMI classroom in the context of Taiwanese higher education. Language Education & Assessment,
1
(1), 28–44.
Lo, Y. Y. (2021). Researching assessment in EMI. In. J. K. H. Pun & S. M. Curle (Eds.), Research methods in English medium instruction (pp. 61–74). Routledge.
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching,
51
(1), 36–76.
Malmström, H., & Pecorari, D. (2021). Disciplinary literacies as a nexus for content and language teacher practice. In D. Lasagabaster & A. Doiz (Eds.), Language use in English-medium instruction at university (pp. 213–221). Routledge.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping cultures. Equinox.
Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2012). Genres across the disciplines. Cambridge University Press.
Parkinson, J. (2017). The student laboratory report genre: A genre analysis. English for Specific Purposes,
45
1, 1–13.
Rose, H., Curle, S., Aizawa, I., & Thompson, G. (2020). What drives success in English medium taught courses? The interplay between language proficiency, academic skills, and motivation. Studies in Higher Education,
45
(11), 2149–2161.
Sánchez-Pérez, M. (2021). Predicting content proficiency through disciplinary-literacy variables in English-medium writing. System,
97
1, 1–12.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students. University of Michigan Press.
Tardy, C., Sommer-Farias, B., & Gevers, J. (2020). Teaching and researching genre knowledge: Toward an enhanced theoretical framework. Written Communication,
37
(3), 287–321.
Wingate, U. (2015). Academic literacy and student diversity. Multilingual Matters.
Yang, W. (2015). Content and language integrated learning next in Asia: evidence of learners’ achievement in CLIL education from a Taiwan tertiary degree programme. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism,
18
(4), 361–382.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Gronchi, Michela
2023.
Language assessment in EMI: unravelling the implicit-explicit dichotomy.
Educational Linguistics
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.