Article In:
Journal of English-Medium Instruction: Online-First ArticlesBeyond inter- and transdisciplinarity
A framework for analysing EMI as an autonomous field of inquiry
While English-medium instruction (EMI) is growing rapidly as a field of practice, there is a lack of agreement around its conceptual and terminological boundaries, and its purposes are often ill defined. To deal with the complexity of the phenomena it addresses, it has been argued that EMI should adopt an interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary perspective. This conceptual article adopts a different position, arguing that EMI is best seen as an example of a “practical assemblage” (Pennycook, 2024), which draws on different epistemic resources to engage with its own set of problems, rather than vying to become a discipline in itself. Using the sociological lens of Legitimation Code Theory (Maton, 2014), the article proposes a framework for positioning EMI as an autonomous field of inquiry, addressing its own problem-situations and research questions. The analysis finds that, rather than building boundaries around itself, EMI as a practical assemblage would be better placed to open itself to ideas from other domains of enquiry while maintaining its autonomy in working on its own problems for its own purposes.
Keywords: English-medium instruction, interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, practical assemblage, Legitimation Code Theory, autonomy
Article outline
- Introduction
- Fragmentation, disconnects and tensions in EMI
- Inter- and transdisciplinarity as a response to the complexities of EMI
- Legitimation code theory: Autonomy
- An Autonomy analysis of EMI as a field of research
- Conclusion
- Author queries
-
References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (43)
Airey, J. (2020). The content lecturer and English-medium instruction (EMI): Epilogue to the special issue on EMI in higher education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism,
23
(3), 340–346. 
Baker, W., & J. Hüttner. (2019). “We are not the language police”: Comparing multilingual EMI programmes in Europe and Asia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics,
29
1, 78–94.
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Rowman & Littlefield.
Bozbiyik, M., & Morton, T. (2023). Transitioning between “outside” and “inside” knowledge in an online university EMI chemistry course. Applied Linguistics,
44
(2), 265–286.
Dafouz, E. (2021). Crossing disciplinary boundaries: English-medium education (EME) meets English for specific purposes (ESP). Ibérica,
41
1, 13–38.
Dafouz, E., Haines, K., & Pagèze, J. (2020). Supporting educational developers in the era of internationalized higher education: Insights from a European project. International Journal of Bilingual education and Bilingualism,
23
(3), 326–339.
Dafouz, E., & Smit, U. (2016). Towards a dynamic conceptual framework for English-medium education in multilingual university settings. Applied Linguistics,
37
(3), 397–415.
(2020). ROAD-MAPPING English medium education in the internationalised university. Palgrave.
Dimova, S., & Kling, J. (2018). Assessing English-medium instruction lecturer language proficiency across disciplines. TESOL Quarterly,
52
(3), 634656.
Doiz, A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2022). Looking into English-medium instruction teachers’ metadiscourse: An ELF perspective. System,
105
1, Article 102730.
Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal,
100
(S1), 19–47.
Gabriëls, R., & Wilkinson, R. (2021). Introduction: The tension between monolingualism and multilingualism. In R. Wilkinson, & R. Gabriëls (Eds.), Englishization of higher education in Europe (pp. 11–36). Amsterdam University Press.
Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2022). Cross-fertilisation, not bifurcation, of EMI and EAP. ELT Journal,
76
(4), 538–546.
Galloway, N., & Ruegg, R. (2022). English medium instruction (EMI) lecturer support needs in Japan and China. System,
105
1, Article 102728.
Hawkins, M. R., & Mori, J. (2018). Considering “trans-”perspectives in language theories and practices. Applied Linguistics,
39
(1), 1–8.
Hult, F. M. (2010). Theme-based research in the transdisciplinary field of educational linguistics. In F. M. Hult (Ed.), Directions and prospects for educational linguistics (pp. 19–32). Springer.
Hultgren, A. K., Nao, M., Wingrove, P., Yuksel, D., & Zuaro, B. (2023). New insights into the trend towards English as a medium of instruction in European higher education through transdisciplinary participation. In N. Hynninen, I. Herneaho, E. Sippola, J. Isosävi & M. Yang (Eds.), AFinLa Yearbook 2023 (pp. 318–331). The Finnish Association for Applied Linguistics.
Klein, J. T. (2017). Typologies of interdisciplinarity: The boundary work of definition. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein & R. C. Dos Santos Pacheco (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (2nd ed., pp. 21–34). Oxford University Press.
Kuteeva, M. (2023). Tension-filled English at the multilingual university: A Bakhtinian perspective. Multilingual Matters.
Lasagabaster, D. (2022). English-medium instruction in higher education. Cambridge University Press.
Li, W. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied linguistics,
39
(1), 9–30.
(2022). Translanguaging as a political stance: Implications for English language education. ELT Journal,
76
(2), 172–182.
Macaro, E. (2018). English medium instruction. Oxford University Press.
Macaro, E., & Aizawa, I. (2022). Who owns English medium instruction? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–14.
Maton, K. (2014). Knowledge and knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. Routledge.
Maton, K., & Chen, R. T.-H. (2016). LCT in qualitative research: Creating a translation device for studying constructivist pedagogy. In K. Maton, S. Hood & S. Shay (Eds.), Knowledge-building: Educational studies in Legitimation Code Theory (pp. 27–48). Routledge.
Maton, K. and Howard, S. K. (2018). Taking autonomy tours: A key to integrative knowledge-building, LCT Centre Occasional Paper,
1
1, 1–35.
Maton, K. & Howard, S. (2020). Autonomy: The next phase of dialogue between systemic functional linguistics and Legitimation Code Theory. Journal of World Languages,
6
(1–2), 92–112.
Martin, J. R., Maton, K., & Doran, Y. J. (2019). Academic discourse: An interdisciplinary dialogue. In J. R. Martin, K. Maton & Y. J. Doran (Eds.), Accessing academic discourse: Systemic functional linguistics and Legitimation Code Theory (pp. 1–31). Routledge.
May, S. (2014). Disciplinary divides, knowledge construction and the multilingual turn. In S. May (Ed.), The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education (pp. 7–31). Routledge.
Moncada-Comas, B., & Block, D. (2021). CLIL-ised EMI in practice: Issues arising. The Language Learning Journal,
49
(6), 686–698.
Murray, N. (2016). Standards of English in higher education: Issues, challenges and strategies. Cambridge University Press.
Pecorari, D. (2020). English medium instruction: Disintegrating language and content? In S. Dimova & J. Kling (Eds.), Integrating content and language in multilingual universities (pp. 15–36). Springer Nature.
Pecorari, D., & Malmström, H. (2018). At the crossroads of TESOL and English medium instruction. TESOL Quarterly,
52
(3), 497–515.
Pennycook, A. (2018). Applied linguistics as epistemic assemblage. AILA Review,
31
(1), 113–134.
(2024). Language assemblages. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Pun, J. (2023). A typology of English-medium instruction. RELC Journal,
54
(1), 216–240.
Rose, H., Macaro, E., Sahan, K., Aizawa, I., Zhou, S., & Wei, M. (2023). Defining English medium instruction: Striving for comparative equivalence. Language Teaching, 56(4), 539–550.
Schmidt-Unterberger, B. (2018). The English-medium paradigm: A conceptualisation of English-medium teaching in higher education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism,
21
(5), 527–539.
Trappes-Lomax, H. (2004). Discourse analysis. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 133–164). Blackwell.
Vorster, J. A. (2020). Academic development: Autonomy pathways towards gaining legitimacy. In C. Winberg, S. McKenna & K. Wilmot (Eds.), Building knowledge in higher education: Enhancing teaching and learning with legitimation code theory (pp. 272–289). Routledge.
Wingate, U., & Hakim, A. (2022). Moving beyond “infancy”: Towards a cross-fertilization between EMI and EAP scholarship. ELT Journal,
76
(4), 529–537.
Zhang, L., & Lo, Y. Y. (2021). EMI teachers’ use of interactive metadiscourse in lecture organization and knowledge construction. In D. Lasagabaster & A. Doiz (Eds.), Language use in English-medium instruction at university: International perspectives on teacher practice (pp. 56–79). Routledge.