Book review
Pejman Habibie & Anna Kristina Hultgren (Eds.). The Inner World of Gatekeeping in Scholarly Publication. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022. 267 pp. Softcover EUR 99.99 / hardcover EUR 99.99 / eBook EUR 85.59. ISBN 978-3-031-06518-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06519-4
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (13)
References
Adams, T. E., Ellis, C., & Holman Jones, S. (2017). Autoethnography. In C. S. Davis & R. F. Potter (Eds.), The
international encyclopedia of communication research
methods (pp. 1–11). John Wiley & Sons. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bocanegra-Valle, A. (2013). The
perceived value of English for academic publishing among ESP multilingual scholars in
Europe. ESP Today. Journal of English for Specific Purposes at Tertiary
Level,
1
(1), 5–25.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bocanegra-Valle, A. (2014). ‘English
is my default academic language’: Voices from LSP scholars publishing in a multilingual
journal. Journal of English for Academic
Purposes,
13
(1), 65–77. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, C. (2007). Telling
secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative
Inquiry,
13
(1), 3–29. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Habibie, P., & Burgess, S. (Eds.) (2021). Scholarly
publication trajectories of early-career scholars: Insider perspectives. Palgrave
Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic
writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in
English. Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Méndez, M. (2013). Autoethnography
as a research method: Advantages, limitations and criticisms. Colombian Applied Linguistics
Journal, 15(2), 279–287. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., & Tardy, C. M. (2016). Ethnographic
perspectives on academic writing. Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Starfield, S. (2013). Researcher
reflexivity. In C. Chapelle (Ed.). The
encyclopedia of applied
linguistics (pp. 4931–4937). Wiley-Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tullis, J. A. (2013). Self
and others: Ethics in autoethnographic research. In S. Holman Jones, T. E. Adams & C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook
of
autoethnography (pp. 244–261). Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tusting, K., McCulloch, S., Bhatt, I., Hamilton, M., & Barton, D. (2019). Academics
writing: The dynamics of knowledge creation. Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wall, S. (2008). Easier
said than done: Writing an autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative
Methods,
7
(1), 38–53. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)