Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes
Vol. 1:1 (2020) ► pp.28–50
Articles

Global perspectives on linguacultural variation in academic publishing

| Georgia State University
| Georgia State University
This primarily interview-based study explores the perspectives of published applied linguists around the world on what has facilitated their success in reaching multiple readerships. The focus, more specifically, is on scholars in non-English-dominant settings, a number of whom have made a commitment to both inter- and intranational academic publication, and their perceptions of intercultural rhetoric issues salient in various linguacultural contexts. The findings indicated that such scholars were divided in their views on whether or not there are considerable differences in the rhetorical expectations of international Anglophone and more region-specific, or intranational, journal audiences. What this study’s participants shared was an appreciation of the complexities of authorial cross-contextual negotiation of multiple research worlds, only some of which are Anglophone.
Keywords: bilingual publishing, dual publication agendas, intercultural rhetoric, linguacultural variation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Prior research
  • 3.The current study
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Data collection
    • 3.3Data analysis
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1From European vantage points: Focus on difference
      • 4.1.1Summary
    • 4.2Views from Asia: Less focused on linguacultural difference
      • 4.2.1Summary
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Pedagogical implications
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 20 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.19009.bel
References (46)
References
Baker, S. (2018, July 19). China on the rise. Inside Higher Ed. <[URL]> (20 February, 2020).
Belcher, D. (2009). How research space is created in a diverse research world. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(4), 221–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). What we need and don’t need intercultural rhetoric for: A retrospective and prospective look at an evolving research area. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25(4), 59–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belcher, D., & Hirvela, A. (2014, March). What helps and hinders publication in applied linguistics journals. Paper presented at the AAAL Annual Conference. Portland, OR.
Bennett, K. (2007). Epistemicide! The tale of a predatory discourse. The Translator, 131, 151–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blair, E. (2015). A reflexive exploration of two qualitative data coding techniques. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 61, 14–29. <[URL]> (20 February, 2020).
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 31, 77–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casanave, C. P. (1998). Transitions: The balancing act of bilingual academics. Journal of Second Language Writing, 71, 175–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Writing up your research. In J. Heigham & R. Croker (Eds.), Qualitative research in applied linguistics (pp. 288–305). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Controversies in second language writing (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casanave, C. P., & Vandrick, S. (Eds.), (2003). Writing for scholarly publication: Behind the scenes in language education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connor, U. (2011). Intercultural rhetoric in the writing classroom. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1984). Audience addressed/audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theory and pedagogy. College Composition and Communication, 351, 155–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Englander, K., & Corcoran, J. (2019). English for research publication purposes: Critical plurilingual pedagogies. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farley, A. F. (2018). NNES RAs: How ELF RAs inform literacy brokers and English for research publication instructors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 331, 69–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, G. (2007). The global spread of English, scientific communication and ESP: Questions of equity, access and domain loss. Iberica, 131, 7–38.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J. (2008). Scholarly writers who use English as an Additional Language: What can Goffman’s “Stigma” tell us? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 77–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). English for research publication purposes. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 301–321). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2019). The linguistic disadvantage of scholars who write in English as an additional language: Myth or reality. Language Teaching, 521, 249–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J., & Li, Y. (2009). English or Chinese? The trade-off between local and international publication among Chinese academics in the humanities and social sciences. Journal of Second Language Writing 181, 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentil, G., & Séror, J. (2014). Canada has two official languages, or does it? Case studies of Canadian scholars’ language choices and practices in disseminating knowledge. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 131, 17–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glesne, C. (2006). Becoming qualitative researchers (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Hinds, J. (1983). Contrastive rhetoric: Japanese and English. Text & Talk, 31, 183–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1987). Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology. In U. Connor & R. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 texts (pp. 141–152). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Hirano, E. (2009). Research article introductions in English for specific purposes: A comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and English. English for Specific Purposes, 281, 240–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 311, 58–69. DOI logo/Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. (1992). The other tongue: English across cultures. (2nd ed.). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, A., & Xu, Z. (2012). Chinese rhetoric and writing: An introduction for language teachers. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
Kuteeva, M., & Mauranen, A. (2014). Writing for publication in multilingual contexts: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 131, 1–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, H., & Lee, K. (2013). Publish (in international indexed journals) or perish: Neoliberal ideology in a Korean university. Language Policy, 121, 215–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
McGrath, L. (2014). Parallel language use in academic and outreach publication: A case study of policy and practice. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 131, 5–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Pérez Llantada, C. (2012). Scientific discourse and the rhetoric of globalization: The impact of culture and language. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Risager, K. (2012). Linguaculture. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rozycki, W., & Johnson, N. (2013). Non-canonical grammar in Best Paper award winners in engineering. English for Specific Purposes, 321, 157–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salager-Meyer, F. (2014). Writing and publishing in peripheral scholarly journals: How to enhance the global influence of multilingual scholars? Journal of English for Academic Purposes 131, 78–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi, L. (2002). How Western-trained Chinese TESOL professionals publish in their home environment. TESOL Quarterly, 361, 625–634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Writing in two cultures: Chinese professors return from the West. Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 591, 369–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1997). English as Tyrannosaurus rex . World Englishes, 161, 373–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Research genres. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tardy, C. (2016). Beyond convention. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Curry, Mary Jane & Theresa Lillis
2024. Multilingualism in academic writing for publication: Putting English in its place. Language Teaching 57:1 ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Strauss, Pat & Emmanuel Manalo
2023. “Most good papers are published in English”. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 4:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Corcoran, James N.
2022. Reflections on the perceived longer-term impact of an ERPP course. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 3:2 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Mirallas, Carolina Andrea & Mariana Pascual
2022. Experticia escrituraria en inglés como lengua extranjera (EFL): definiciones en la literatura y autorrepresentaciones de investigadores. Enunciación 27:1 ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.