Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes
Vol. 2:2 (2021) ► pp.160–171
Perspective

Linguistic injustice in academic publishing in English

Limitations and ways forward in the debate

| Stockholm University

In recent years, an intense debate in English for research publication purposes (ERPP) has developed around the question of whether linguistic injustice exists or not in academic publishing in English. In this Perspectives piece, I wish to engage in this debate by first situating the terms in which it is being developed, and then pointing out some of its limitations. In doing that, I argue that the view of language that is currently held in the debate seems problematic, and that a more explicit attention to the socially stratified nature of academic publishing seems missing from the debate. Suggesting potential ways forward, I propose that it seems crucial to adopt a view of language that anchors it more firmly as a social phenomenon, inherently connected to its speakers and the socially situated and stratified position that they inhabit. Remembering this is important in order to remain aware of the fact that both linguistic and non-linguistic factors are at play in shaping the uneven nature of academic publishing in English.

Keywords: linguistic injustice, academic publishing, English for research publication purposes
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.No language-based injustices in academic publishing in English?
  • 3.Limitations of the debate and possible ways forward
  • 4.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 10 January 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.21002.sol
References
Block, D.
(2018) Political economy and sociolinguistics: Neoliberalism, inequality and social class. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J.
(2010) The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J. C., & De Saint Martin, M.
(1994) Academic discourse, linguistic misunderstanding, and professorial power. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, A. S.
(1996) “Nondiscursive” requirements in academic publishing, material resources of periphery scholars, and the politics of knowledge production. Written Communication, 13 (4), 435–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corcoran, J.
(2017) The potential and limitations of an English for research publication purposes course for Mexican scholars. In M. J. Curry & T. Lillis (Eds.), Global academic publishing: Policies, perspectives and pedagogies (pp. 233–248). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dołowy-Rybińska, N.
(2021) Publishing policy: Toward counterbalancing inequalities in academia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 267–268 1, 99–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flores, N., & Rosa, J.
(2015) Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85 (2), 149–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J.
(2019) The linguistic disadvantage of scholars who write in English as an additional language: Myth or reality. Language Teaching, 52 1, 249–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Habibie, P., & Hyland, K.
(Eds.) (2019) Novice writers and scholarly publication. Authors, mentors, gatekeepers. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanauer, D., Sheridan, C., & Englander, K.
(2019) Linguistic injustice in the writing of research articles in English as a second language: Data from Taiwanese and Mexican researchers. Written Communication, 36 1, 136–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heng Hartse, J., & Kubota, R.
(2014) Pluralizing English? Variation in high-stakes academic texts and challenges of copyediting. Journal of Second Language Writing, 24 1, 71–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holborow, M.
(2015) Language and neoliberalism. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hultgren, A. K.
(2019) English as the language for academic publication: On equity, disadvantage and “non-nativeness” as a red herring. Publications, 7 1, 31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
(2016) Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31 1, 58–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) Peer review. Objective screening or wishful thinking? Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 1 (1), 51–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubota, R.
(2020) Confronting epistemological racism, decolonizing scholarly knowledge: Race and gender in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 41 (5), 712–732. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuteeva, M., & McGrath, L.
(2014) Taming Tyrannosaurus Rex: English use in the research and publication practices of humanities scholars in Sweden. Multilingua, 33 (3–4), 365–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J.
(2010) Academic writing in a global context. The politics and practices of publishing in English. Routledge.Google Scholar
(2015) The politics of English, language and uptake. The case of international academic journal article reviews. AILA Review, 28 1, 127–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Rojo, L.
(2021) Hegemonies and inequalities in academia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 267–268 1, 169–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Rojo, L., & Del Percio, A.
(Eds.) (2020) Language and neoliberal governmentality. Routledge.Google Scholar
Matsuda, P. K., & Tardy, C. M.
(2007) Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review. English for Specific Purposes, 26 1, 235–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
May, S.
(2015) The problem with English(es) and linguistic (in)justice. Addressing the limits of liberal egalitarian accounts of language. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 18 (2), 131–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKinley, J., & Rose, H.
(2018) Conceptualizations of language errors, standards, norms and nativeness in English for research publication purposes: An analysis of journal submission guidelines. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42 1, 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Neil, D.
(2018) English as the lingua franca of international publishing. World Englishes, 37 (2), 146–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A., & Otsuji, E.
(2015) Metrolingualism. Language in the city. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Politzer-Ahles, S., Holliday, J. J., Girolamo, T., Spychalska, M., & Berkson, K. H.
(2016) Is linguistic injustice a myth? A response to Hyland (2016). Journal of Second Language Writing, 34 1, 3–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Politzer-Ahles, S., Girolamo, T., & Ghali, S.
(2020) Preliminary evidence of linguistic bias in academic reviewing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 47 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rozycki, W., & Johnson, N. H.
(2013) Non-canonical grammar in best paper award winners in engineering. English for Specific Purposes, 32 1, 157–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salö, L.
(2017) The sociolinguistics of academic publishing. Languages and the practices of homo academicus. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tardy, C. M., & Matsuda, P. K.
(2009) The construction of author voice by editorial board members. Written Communication, 26 (1), 32–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tupas, R.
(Ed.) (2015) Unequal Englishes: The politics of Englishes today. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar