Cover not available
Article published In:
The dynamics of academic knowledge production: Text histories and text trajectories
Edited by Theresa Lillis and Mary Jane Curry
[Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 3:1] 2022
► pp. 78–108

Citation in global academic knowledge making

A paired text history methodology for studying citation practices in English and Russian

| HSE University, Russia
| The Open University, UK
This paper introduces a paired text history methodology to explore the citation practices of three experienced Russian scholars in philosophy, sociology, and economics. The empirical focus is on the analysis of three paired text histories, comparing Russian-medium research articles with English-medium research articles in each discipline. By analyzing the paired text histories through the use of multiple data sources – article drafts, email correspondence surrounding text production, and interviews – focusing specifically on the changes made to citations in each pair, the paper seeks to throw light on both micro and macro level knowledge production practices. At the micro level, the paper analyses changes made to citations across English and Russian-medium texts, documenting the involvement of literacy brokers, their evaluative requests about citations, and authors’ responses to such requests. At the macro level, the paper raises questions about what counts as ‘citeworthy’ in different geolinguistic contexts and considers the consequences of citation brokering and citation practices for knowledge production and circulation globally.
Keywords: academic writing, citation practices, literacy brokers, Russian scholars, writing multilingually
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A paired text history methodology
  • 3.The study on which this paper is based
    • 3.1The larger study
    • 3.2The dataset used in this paper
    • 3.3Method of analysis
  • 4.PTH1 philosophy
    • 4.1The Russian-medium text
      • 4.1.1Author and broker involvement
      • 4.1.2Changes requested and author response
    • 4.2The English-medium text
      • 4.2.1Authors and brokers
      • 4.2.2Changes requested and author responses
    • 4.3Comparison of changes made
  • 5.PTH2 sociology
    • 5.1The English-medium text
      • 5.1.1Author and brokers
      • 5.1.2Changes requested and author responses
    • 5.2The Russian-medium text
      • 5.2.1Authors and brokers
      • 5.2.2Changes requested and author responses
    • 5.3Comparison of changes made
  • 6.PTH3 economics
    • 6.1The Russian-medium text
      • 6.1.1Authors and brokers
      • 6.1.2Changes requested and author responses
    • 6.2The English-medium text
      • 6.2.1Authors and brokers
      • 6.2.2Changes requested and author responses
    • 6.3Comparison of changes made
  • 7.Discussion
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 June 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.21013.smi
References (36)
References
Ammon, U. (Ed.). (2001). The dominance of English as a language of science. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. University of Wisconsin Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beigel, F., Gallardo, O., & Bekerman, F. (2018). Institutional expansion and scientific development in the periphery. Minerva, 56 (3), 305–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, K. (2007). Epistemicide! The tale of a predatory discourse. The Translator, 13 1, 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Discourses of knowledge: cultural disjunctions and their implications for the language industries. Ibérica, 271, 35–50.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action (trans. R. Johnson). Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cargill, M., Burgess, S., & Arnbjörnsdóttir, B. (2019). Editorial: Publishing research internationally: Multilingual perspectives from research and practice. Publications, 7(3), 47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the Science citation index to cybermetrics. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Feng, H., Beckett, G. H., & Huang, D. (2013). From ‘import’ to ‘import-export’ oriented internationalization: The impact of national policy on scholarly publication in China. Language Policy, 12 1, 251–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, G. (2007). The global spread of English, scientific communication and ESP: questions of equity, access and domain loss. Ibérica, 13 1, 7–38.Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2019). Points of reference: Changing patterns of academic citation. Applied Linguistics, 40 (1), 64–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hynninen, N. (2020). Moments and mechanisms of intervention along textual trajectories: Norm negotiations in English-medium research writing. Text & Talk. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirchik, O., Gingras, Y., & Larivière, V. (2012). Changes in publication languages and citation practices and their effect on the scientific impact of Russian science (1993–2010). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1411–1419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, J. (2018). Other voices: Authors’ literary-academic presence and publication in the discursive world system. Discourse, 39 (4), 521–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Y. (2014). Seeking entry to the North American market: Chinese management academics publishing internationally. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 131, 41–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T. (2012). Economies of Signs in Writing for Academic Publication: The Case of English Medium “National” Journals. JAC, 32(3/4), 695–722. [URL]Google Scholar
(2017) Resistir regímenes de evaluación en el estudio del escribir: hacia un imaginario enriquecido, Signo y pensamiento, 36 (71): 66–81 ISSN ISSN 0120-4823Google Scholar
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2006). Professional academic writing by multilingual scholars: Interactions with literacy brokers in the production of English-medium texts. Written Communication, 23 (1), 3–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Academic writing in a global context. Routledge.Google Scholar
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. (2018). Trajectories of knowledge and desire: Multilingual women scholars researching and writing in academia. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 32 1, 53–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T., Hewings, A., & Vladimirou, D. (2010). The geolinguistics of English as an academic lingua franca : citation practices across English-medium national and English-medium international journals. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20 (1), 111–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T. and Maybin, J. (2017). Introduction: The dynamics of textual trajectories in professional and workplace practice. Text & Talk, 37(4), 409–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T., McMullan, J., & Tuck, J. (Eds.) (2018). Gender and academic writing. Special Issue, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 32 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, A. (1993). Cultural differences in academic rhetoric. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. (1984). Typicality and the case study. In R. Ellen (Ed.), Ethnographic research: A guide to general conduct (pp. 237–241). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, F. (2008). Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 71, 121–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Writing and publishing in peripheral scholarly journals: How to enhance the global influence of multilingual EAL scholars. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 131, 78–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samraj, B. (2013). Form and function of citations in discussion sections of master’s theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12 (4), 299–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smirnova, N., Lillis, T., & Hultgren, A. (2021). English and/or Russian medium publications? A case study exploring academic research writing in contemporary Russian academia. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 53 1, 101015. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1986). Citation analysis and discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics 7(1), 39–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1987). Utilizing the literatures in teaching the research paper. TESOL Quarterly, 211, 41–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tian, M., Su, Y., & Ru, X. (2016). Perish or publish in China: Pressures on young Chinese scholars to publish in internationally indexed journals. Publications, 4 (2), 9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Anikina, Zhanna, Ksenia Girfanova & Liubov Goncharova
2024. “Writing for English-medium publication is a journey to nowhere — no route and no tools”: Russian academics’ perceptions of the existing publication support. Higher Education DOI logo
Calle-Arango, Lina & Natalia Ávila Reyes
2024. ‘I always prefer to quote well-known people’: identity negotiations while constructing Ph.D. students’ intertextual repertoire. Language and Education ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.