Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes
Vol. 3:2 (2022) ► pp.225–245
Perspective

Plagiarism and proper source use in Chinese writing

Historical and contemporary perspectives

| University of Hong Kong
Article outline
  • 1.“Cross-cultural differences” explaining “text recycling”?
  • 2.Plagiarism consistently condemned in China; norms on proper use of prior texts emerged early but have remained under-developed for a long time
  • 3.Contemporary Chinese scholars’ conceptualisation of plagiarism
  • 4.Official guidelines and university policies cannot lead to a specific understanding of how to cite sources properly and how to avoid plagiarism
  • 5.Writing textbooks increasingly addressing the issue of plagiarism but still lacking in specific teaching of textual strategies of proper citation
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 December 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.22006.li
References (59)
References
Cao, S. (1999/2004). Xueshu piping de guifan [Norms in academic criticism]. First published in Wen Hui Bao (1999, March 6). Reprinted in Y. Yang & B. Zhang (Eds.) (2004). Xueshu guifan duben [Academic norms: A reader] (pp. 257–259). Henan University Press.Google Scholar
Cargill, M., & O’Connor, P. (2013). Writing scientific research articles: Strategy and steps (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Charles, M., Pecorari, D., & Hunston, S. (Eds.). (2009). Academic writing: At the interface of corpus and discourse. Continuum.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. (2011). Zhuyin chuantong yu xueshu guifan qiantan – Jizhong zhushi biaozhun zhi bijiao [The tradition of annotation and academic norms: A comparison between several annotation standards]. Yunmeng Xuekan [Journal of Yunmeng], (1), 34–37.Google Scholar
Cooper, H. (2016). Ethical choices in research: Managing data, writing reports, and publishing results in the social sciences. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Coyle, W., & Law, J. (2015). Research papers (16th ed.). Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar
Cui, K., Li, X., Wang, D., & Liu, S. V. (2010). A candid presentation of Nature’s handling of correspondences. Scientific Ethics, 5 (1), 6–9.Google Scholar
Davis, M., & Morley, J. (2015). Phrasal intertextuality: The responses of academics from different disciplines to students’ re-use of phrases. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28 1, 20–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du, Y. (2022). Adopting critical-pragmatic pedagogy to address plagiarism in a Chinese context: An action research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erudition (2005). Zhongguo jiben gujiku [Chinese Classics Database]. Beijing Erudition Digital Technology Research Centre.Google Scholar
Fang, L. (2006). Xueshu piaoqie he falü neiwai de duice [Academic plagiarism and coping strategies within and beyond the scope of law]. Zhongguo Faxue [China Legal Science], (6), 155–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gu, Q., & Brooks, J. (2008). Beyond the accusation of plagiarism. System, 36 1, 337–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guo, K. (1999). Lun Qingdai kaojuxue de xueshu guifan [Academic standardisations practised by the School of Textual Criticism in the Qing Dynasty]. Qingshi Yanjiu [The Qing History Journal], (3), 65–69.Google Scholar
Guo, L. (2020). Xueqian jiaoyu zhuanye biye lunwen xiezuo [Thesis writing for students in pre-school education studies]. Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Jin, D. (2010, April 7). Wenfeng, guifan yu bashi niandai xueshu sixiang fenwei [Academic integrity, academic norms and the academic environment of the 1980s]. Zhonghua Dushubao [China Book News], 0051.Google Scholar
Jin, J., & Zheng, Y. (2020). Yanjiusheng yingyu xueshu lunwen xiezuo [English academic writing for graduate students]. Tsinghua University Press.Google Scholar
Ke, Z. (2021). Handai yinwen fengqi bianqian yu yinwen guifan de queli [Changes in the practice of quotation and the establishment of quotation norms in the Han Dynasty]. Shenzhen Daxue Xuebao [Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities ＆ Social Sciences)], 38 (2), 121–129.Google Scholar
Lei, J., & Hu, G. (2015). Chinese university EFL teachers’ perceptions of plagiarism. Higher Education, 70 1, 551–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, J. (2011, March 9). Zhuiqiu zhengli haishi keshou pingyong – du Zhongguo xinyinyue shilun zengdingban yougan [Pursuing truth or sticking to mediocrity – On reading the expanded edition of A critical history of new music in China ]. Yinyue Zhoubao [Music Weekly], 61.Google Scholar
Li, W., Mao, Y., & Xiao, D. (2020). Xuewei lunwen xiezuo yu xueshu guifan [Thesis writing and academic norms]. Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Y. (2013). Text-based plagiarism in scientific writing: What Chinese supervisors think about copying and how to reduce it in students’ writing. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19 1, 569–583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Collaboration between EAP teachers and content teachers: Insights from the literature for the Chinese context. International Journal of English for Academic Purposes: Research and Practice, 1 1, 37–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022). A man of “a pure heart”: An academic biography of Liu Ching-chih. Bridge21 Publications.Google Scholar
Li, Y., & Flowerdew, J. (2019). What really is the relationship between plagiarism and culture? Some thoughts from the Chinese context. In D. Pecorari & P. Shaw (Eds.), Student plagiarism in higher education: Reflections on teaching practice (pp. 140–156). Routledge.Google Scholar
Ling, F., Pan, W., & Yang, K. (2011). Xueshu chaoxi xingwei de fangzhi yanjiu tantao [On the prevention of academic plagiarism]. Qingbao Zazhi [Journal of Intelligence], 30 1, 25–29 & 60.Google Scholar
Liu, C.-C. (1998). Zhongguo xinyinyue shilun [A critical history of new music in China]. Taipei: All Music Publishing Press.Google Scholar
Liu, D. (2005). Plagiarism in ESOL students: Is cultural conditioning truly the major culprit? ELT Journal, 59 1, 234–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z., Xiu, Y., & Zhang, T. (2019). Yingyu xueshu lunwen xiezuo [English academic writing]. China People’s University Press.Google Scholar
National Press and Publication Administration (2019). Xueshu chuban guifan – Qikan xueshu buduan xingwei jieding [Academic publishing specification – Definition of academic misconduct for journals] (CY/T 174 – 2019). [URL]
Pecorari, D. (2013). Teaching to avoid plagiarism: How to promote good source use. Open University Press.Google Scholar
People’s Republic of China Ministry of Education. (2004). Gaodeng xuexiao zhexue shehui kexue yanjiu xueshu guifan (shixing) [Rules and regulations for academic work in philosophy and social sciences in higher learning institutions (draft)]. [URL]
Princeton University (n.d.). Academic integrity at Princeton. The Trustees of Princeton University.
Qiu, J. (2010, January 14). Publish or perish in China. Nature, 463 1, 142–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ren, D. (2002). Women xuyao shenmeyang de xueshu zhushi guifan? [What kind of an academic annotation system do we need?]. Shehui Kexue Luntan [Social Sciences Forum], (9), 41–45.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. (1995). Plagiarism and ideology: Identity in intercultural discourse. Language in Society, 24 1, 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, J. (2001). Dui Liu Jingzhi Zhongguo xinyinyue shilun de ganxiang he kanfa [Reflections on Liu Ching-chih’s A critical history of new music in China]. In C.-C. Liu & M. Li (Eds.), Zhongguo xinyinyue shilun yantaohui lunwenji [Papers and proceedings of three seminars on A critical history of new music in China] (pp. 303–309). Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong and Centre for Literature and Translation, Lingnan University (Hong Kong).Google Scholar
Tao, F. (2005). Xueshu lunwen xiezuo tongjian [A general guide for academic writing]. Anhui University Press.Google Scholar
Ting, M. H. (2012). Chinese culture and plagiarism: A convenient cause for an inconvenient issue in the academy. In X. Song & K. Cadman (Eds.), Bridging transcultural divides: Asian languages and cultures in global higher education (pp. 253–267). University of Adelaide Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turabian, K., Grossman, J., & Bennett, A. (2015). Zhijiage daxue lunwen xiezuo zhinan [A manual for writers of term papers, theses and dissertations: Chicago style for students and researchers] (6th ed.) (L. Lei. Trans.). Xinhua Publishing House. (Original work published 1996)Google Scholar
Wang, B. (2010). Wang Hui Fankang juewang – Lu Xun jiqi wenxue shijie de xuefeng wenti [The academic sloppiness in Wang Hui’s Defying the despair – Lu Xun and his literary world ]. Wenyi Yanjiu [Literary Art Research], (3), 126–138.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. (2017). Xueshu lunwen xiezuo yu fabiao zhiyin [Academic writing and publishing: A guide]. People’s University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. (2021). Xueshu guifan shouce [Handbook of academic norms]. Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, D. (2007). Plagiarism and redundancy [Editorial]. Biomaterials, 28 1, 2535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, T. (1995). Yao zhuyi xueshu yanjiu zhong de wende he xuefeng wenti [One should pay attention to the issues of academic ethics and attitude in research work]. Zhongguo Shehui Kexue [China Social Sciences], (4), 204–207.Google Scholar
Yang, H. (2010). Shouhu xueshu de dixian: Yinwen anquan [Defending the bottom line of scholarship: Citation safety]. Yunmeng Xuekan, [Journal of Yunmeng], (4), 21–24.Google Scholar
Yang, J. (2020). Waiguo yuyan wenxue xueshu guifan yu fangfalun yanjiu [Academic norms and methodologies in foreign language and literature studies]. Nanjing University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, M. (1988). Woguo yinyuexue xueshu lunwen xiezuo zhong de jige wenti [Several problems in academic writing in musicology]. Yinyue Yanjiu [Music Studies], (4), 67–72.Google Scholar
Yang, Y., & Zhang, B. (Eds.) (2004). Xueshu guifan duben [Academic norms: A reader] (pp. 257–259). Henan University Press.Google Scholar
Yao, S. (1998). Dangdai zhongguo xueshu: Shifan yu guifan [Contemporary Chinese academia: Anomie and standardisation]. Zhongguo Bijiao Wenxue [China Comparative Literature], (1), 139–141.Google Scholar
Yuan, Y. (1985). Zhongguo gudai banquanshi kaolue [A history of copyright in classical China]. Faxue Zazhi [Law Science Magazine], (3), 40–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeng, J. (2019). Tushuguan ying kaichuang xueshu guifan fuwu [Libraries should set up services teaching academic norms]. Shuzi Tushuguan Luntan [Digital Library Forum] (8), 1.Google Scholar
Zhang, G., & Yu, S. (2016). Xueshu yinyong de lunli wenti [Ethical issues in academic citation]. Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Pingjia [Review of China Social Sciences], (2), 94–104.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. (2021). Xueshu yingyu xiezuo kecheng zhong de chengxin jiaoyu [Academic integrity education in an academic English writing course]. Waiyu yu Fanyi [Foreign Languages & Translation], (3), 63–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, S. (1963). Guang jiaochou lue [The scholarship of collation in Chinese]. China Publishing House.Google Scholar
(1985). Wenxianxue lunzhu jiyao [Highlights of philology texts]. Shaanxi People’s Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. (2010a, September 9). Chinese journal finds 31% of submissions plagiarized. Nature, 467 1, 153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010b, October 14). International, not ‘campus’, please. Nature, 467 1, 789. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhao, W. (2000). Xueshu guifan jianshe yu xuezhe de daode zilü [Academic standardisation and scholars’ moral self-discipline]. Ziran Bianzhengfa Tongxun [Journal of Dialectics of Nature], 22 (4), 2–3. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Y. (2010, April 12). Wang Hui shijian, bubi lache shidai [The incident of Wang Hui, do not blame the times]. Xinhua Net. [URL]
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Li, Yongyan, Meng Ge & Qianshan Chen
2024. How English academic writing textbooks written by Chinese EFL teachers address the issue of plagiarism. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 69 ► pp. 101388 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.