Cover not available
Article published In:
Understanding language genealogy: Alternatives to the tree model
Edited by Siva Kalyan, Alexandre François and Harald Hammarström
[Journal of Historical Linguistics 9:1] 2019
► pp. 92–127

Subgrouping the Sogeram languages

A critical appraisal of Historical Glottometry

| Australian National University / Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language | Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language
| Australian National University / Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language | Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language
| Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language
Historical Glottometry is a method, recently proposed by Kalyan and François (François 2014; Kalyan & François 2018), for analyzing and representing the relationships among sister languages in a language family. We present a glottometric analysis of the Sogeram language family of Papua New Guinea and, in the process, provide an evaluation of the method. We focus on three topics that we regard as problematic: how to handle the higher incidence of cross-cutting isoglosses in the Sogeram data; how best to handle lexical innovations; and what to do when the data do not allow the analyst to be sure whether a given language underwent a given innovation or not. For each topic we compare different ways of coding and calculating the data and suggest the best way forward. We conclude by proposing changes to the way glottometric data are coded and calculated and the way glottometric results are visualized. We also discuss how to incorporate Historical Glottometry into an effective historical-linguistic research workflow.
Keywords: Historical Glottometry, subgrouping, language diversification, comparative reconstruction, Sogeram languages, Madang languages, Papuan languages
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Models of linguistic relatedness and subgrouping
    • 1.2The Sogeram languages
  • 2.The data and the method
    • 2.1The Sogeram innovations dataset
    • 2.2Calculating relatedness: The method of Historical Glottometry
  • 3.The glottometric view of the Sogeram languages
    • 3.1Cross-cutting isoglosses
    • 3.2Lexical replacement
    • 3.3Blank cells in glottometric datasets
  • 4.Discussion and conclusions
    • 4.1Improving the method
    • 4.2Historical Glottometry as part of the historical linguist’s toolkit
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.17011.dan
References (48)
References
Bowern, Claire. 2013. Relatedness as a Factor in Language Contact. Journal of Language Contact 6:2.411–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Eric W. 2017. Otomanguean Historical Linguistics: Exploring the Subgroups. Language and Linguistics Compass 11:7.e12244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Don. 2010a. A Preliminary Phonological History of the Sogeram Languages of Papua New Guinea. Oceanic Linguistics 49:1.163–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010b. The Position of Manat Within the Sogeram Family. Talk presented at the Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, 2010.
. 2014. Complex Coordination in Diachrony: Two Sogeram Case Studies. Diachronica 31:3.379–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. A Reconstruction of Proto-Sogeram: Phonology, Lexicon, and Morphosyntax. University of California, Santa Barbara PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2016. Magɨ: An Undocumented Language of Papua New Guinea. Oceanic Linguistics 55:1.199–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017a. A Method for Mitigating the Problem of Borrowing in Syntactic Reconstruction. Studies in Language 41:3.577–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. Gants is a Sogeram Language. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 351.82–93.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2015. The Historical Dynamics of Morphological Complexity in Trans-Himalayan. Linguistic Discovery 13:2.60–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epps, Patience. 2013. Inheritance, Calquing, or Independent Innovation? Reconstructing Morphological Complexity in Amazonian Numerals. Journal of Language Contact 6:2.329–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fedden, Sebastian, Dunstan Brown, Greville Corbett, Gary Holton, Marian Klamer, Laura C. Robinson & Antoinette Schapper. 2013. Conditions on Pronominal Marking in the Alor-Pantar Languages. Linguistics 51:1.33–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A. 2017. The Languages of the Sepik-Ramu Basin and Environs. In Bill Palmer, ed., 197–432.Google Scholar
François, Alexandre. 2005. Unraveling the History of the Vowels of Seventeen Northern Vanuatu Languages. Oceanic Linguistics 44:2.443–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Social Ecology and Language History in the Northern Vanuatu Linkage: A Tale of Divergence and Convergence. Journal of Historical Linguistics 1:2.175–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The Dynamics of Linguistic Diversity: Egalitarian Multilingualism and Power Imbalance Among Northern Vanuatu Languages. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2012:214.85–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Shadows of Bygone Lives: The Histories of Spiritual Words in Northern Vanuatu. Lexical and Structural Etymology: Beyond Word Histories ed. by Robert Mailhammer, 185–244. (= Studies in Language Change, 11.) Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Trees, Waves and Linkages: Models of Language Diversification. The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics ed. by Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans, 161–189. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Geraghty, Paul. 1983. The History of the Fijian Languages. (= Oceanic Linguistics, Special Publication 19.) Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Kyle. 1990. Nend Grammar Essentials. Two Grammatical Studies ed. by John R. Roberts, 73–156. (= Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages, 37.) Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Heuvel, Wilco van den & Sebastian Fedden. 2014. Greater Awyu and Greater Ok: Inheritance or Contact? Oceanic Linguistics 53:1.1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalyan, Siva & Alexandre François. 2018. Freeing the Comparative Method from the tree model: A framework for Historical Glottometry. In Ritsuko Kikusawa & Lawrence Reid (eds), Let’s talk about trees: Genetic Relationships of Languages and Their Phylogenic Representation (Senri Ethnological Studies, 98). Ōsaka: National Museum of Ethnology. 59–89.Google Scholar
Korn, Agnes. 2016. A Partial Tree of Central Iranian: A New Look at Iranian Subphyla. Indogermanische Forschungen 121:1.401–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loughnane, Robyn & Sebastian Fedden. 2011. Is Oksapmin Ok? A Study of the Genetic Relationship Between Oksapmin and the Ok Languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 31:1.1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 2002. Genetic Versus Contact Relationship: Prosodic Diffusibility in South-East Asian Languages. Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon, 291–327. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1996. The Comparative Method as Heuristic. The Comparative Method Reviewed: Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change ed. by Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross, 39–71. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Bill, ed. 2018. The Languages and Linguistics of the New Guinea Area: A Comprehensive Guide. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawley, Andrew. 1999. Chasing Rainbows: Implications of the Rapid Dispersal of Austronesian Languages for Subgrouping and Reconstruction. Selected Papers from the 8th International Conference in Austronesian Linguistics ed. by Elizabeth Zeitoun & Paul Jen-kuei Li, 95–138. Taipei: Academica Sinica.Google Scholar
. 2005. The Chequered Career of the Trans New Guinea Hypothesis: Recent Research and Its Implications. In Andrew Pawley, Robert Attenborough, Jack Golson & Robin Hide, eds., 67–107.Google Scholar
. 2006. Madang Languages. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 71 ed. by Keith Brown, 429–432. Boston: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawley, Andrew, Robert Attenborough, Jack Golson & Robin Hide, eds. 2005. Papuan Pasts: Cultural, Linguistic and Biological Histories of Papuan-speaking Peoples. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew & Harald Hammarström. 2017. The Trans New Guinea Family. In Bill Palmer, ed., 21–196.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 1988. Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian Languages of Western Melanesia. (= Pacific Linguistics C, 98.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 1997. Social Networks and Kinds of Speech-Community Event. Archaeology and Language I: Theoretical and Methodological Orientations ed. by Roger Blench & Matthew Spriggs, 209–261. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2005. Pronouns as a Preliminary Diagnostic for Grouping Papuan Languages. In Andrew Pawley, Robert Attenborough, Jack Golson & Robin Hide, eds., 15–65.Google Scholar
. 2015. The Argument Indexing of Early Austronesian Verbs: A Reconstructional Myth? Historical Linguistics 2013: Selected Papers from the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oslo, 5–9 August 2013 ed. by Dag T. T. Haug, 257–279. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarvasy, Hannah. 2014. Four Finisterre-Huon Languages: An Introduction. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 67:3.275–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schleicher, August. 1853. Die ersten Spaltungen des indogermanischen Urvolkes. Allgemeine Monatsschrift für Wissenschaft und Literatur, 786–787.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Johannes. 1872. Die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.Google Scholar
Wade, Martha. 1991. An Overview of the Culture of the Apalɨ Speaking People. Ms, Pioneer Bible Translators.Google Scholar
. 1993. Language Convergence or Divergence: The Case of the Apalɨ (Emerum) Language. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 241.73–93.Google Scholar
. 1997. Switch Reference and Control in Apalɨ. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 281.1–16.Google Scholar
Willis, David. 2011. Reconstructing Last Week’s Weather: Syntactic Reconstruction and Brythonic Free Relatives. Journal of Linguistics 47:2.407–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Z’graggen, John A. 1971. Classificatory and Typological Studies in Languages of the Madang District. (= Pacific Linguistics C, 19.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
1975a. The Languages of the Madang District, Papua New Guinea. (= Pacific Linguistics B, 41.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
1975b. The Madang-Adelbert Range Subphylum. Papuan Languages and the New Guinea Linguistic Scene ed. by Stephen A. Wurm, 569–612. (= Pacific Linguistics C, 38.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
1980. A Comparative Word List of the Southern Adelbert Range Languages, Madang Province, Papua New Guinea. (= Pacific Linguistics D, 33.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Barlow, Russell
2021. Review of Daniels (2020): Grammatical reconstruction: The Sogeram languages of New Guinea. Diachronica 38:4 ► pp. 628 ff. DOI logo
Leddy-Cecere, Thomas A.
2021. Interrogating the Egypto-Sudanic Arabic Connection. Languages 6:3 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Daniels, Don
2020. The history of tense and aspect in the Sogeram family. Journal of Historical Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Daniels, Don
2021. The issue of arbitrariness in syntactic reconstruction. Folia Linguistica 55:s42-s2 ► pp. 393 ff. DOI logo
Daniels, Don
2022. The history of tense and aspect in the Sogeram family. In Development of Tense and Aspect Systems [Benjamins Current Topics, 123], ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Daniels, Don
2024. Semi-embedded clauses in Aisi. Functions of Language DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.