Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 8:3 (2018) ► pp.388–443

Swimming against the typological tide or paddling along with language change?

Dispreferred structures and diachronic biases in affix ordering

| Hebrew University of Jerusalem
| F.R.S.-FNRS | University of Liège

It has repeatedly been observed that there is a worldwide preference for suffixes over prefixes. In this article, we argue that universally dispreferred – or rare – structures can and do arise as the result of regular processes of language change, given the right background structures. Specifically, we show that Ancient Egyptian-Coptic undergoes a long-term diachronic macro-change from exhibiting mixed suffixing-prefixing to showing an overwhelming preference for prefixing. The empirical basis for this study is a comparison of ten typologically significant parameters in which prefixing or affixing is potentially at stake, based on Dryer’s (2013a) 969-language sample. With its extremely high prefixing preference, Coptic belongs to the rare 6% or so of languages that are predominantly prefixing. We argue that each of the micro-changes implicated in this macro-change are better understood in terms of changes at the level of individual constructions, rather than in terms of a broad structural “drift.” Crucially, there is nothing unusual about the actual processes of change themselves.

Keywords: universals, typological rara, Ancient Egyptian-Coptic, diachronic typology, affixation, linear order
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.A predominantly prefixing language: Coptic
    • 3.1Ancient Egyptian-Coptic: Background information
    • 3.2The prefixing score of Coptic
    • 3.3Coptic morphology: Some basic facts
  • 4.The diachrony of affixing and affix ordering in Ancient Egyptian-Coptic
    • 4.1Case-marking
    • 4.2Subject person markers on verbs
    • 4.3Tense-aspect affixes on verbs
    • 4.4Plural affixes on nouns
    • 4.5Pronominal possessive affixes on nouns
    • 4.6Definite or indefinite affixes on nouns
    • 4.7Pronominal object affixes on verbs
    • 4.8Negative affixes on verbs
    • 4.9Interrogative affixes on verbs
    • 4.10Adverbial subordinator affixes on verbs
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • Sources
  • References
Published online: 13 March 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.17027.gro
References

Sources

For references to the Bible in Coptic, see Loprieno, Müller & Uljas (2017: 762–763). Other sources are listed below.

Cairo Bowl = Gardiner, Alan Henderson 1928 Egyptian Letters to the Dead, Mainly from the Old and Middle Kingdoms, copied, trans. and ed. by Alan Henderson Gardiner & Kurt Sethe. London: Egypt Exploration Society.Google Scholar
CT II = de Buck, Adriaan 1935 The Egyptian Coffin Texts II: Texts of Spells 76–163. (=  Oriental Institute Publications, 49.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
CT III = de Buck, Adriaan 1947 The Egyptian Coffin Texts III: Texts of Spells 164–267. (=  Oriental Institute Publications, 49.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Denk. der Oase Dakhla = Osing, Jürgen, Mohamed Moursi, Dorothea Arnold, Otto Neugebauer, Richard A. Parker, David Pingree & Abd el-Halim Nur-el-Din 1982 Denkmäler der Oase Dachla: aus dem Nachlass von Ahmed Fakhry. (=  Archäologische Veröffentlichungen, Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Abteilung Kairo, 28.) Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Hammamat = Couyat, J. & Pierre Montet 1912 Les inscriptions hiéroglyphiques et hiératiques du Ouâdi Hammâmât. (= Mémoires publiés par les membres de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale, 34.) Cairo: Imprimerie de l’IFAO.Google Scholar
HO = Jaroslav Černý & Alan H. Gardiner 1957 Hieratic ostraca. Oxford: Griffith Institute.Google Scholar
KRI = Kitchen, Kenneth A. 1969–1990 Ramesside Inscriptions: Historical and Biographical. Oxford: B. H. Blackwell Ltd.Google Scholar
LEM = Gardiner, Alan H. 1937 Late Egyptian Miscellanies. (=  Bibliotheca Aegyptiaca, VII.) Brussels: Édition de la Fondation Égyptologique Reine Élisabeth.Google Scholar
LES = Gardiner, Alan H. 1932 Late-Egyptian Stories. (=  Bibliotheca Aegyptiaca, I.) Brussels: Édition de la Fondation Égyptologique Reine Élisabeth.Google Scholar
LRL = Černý, Jaroslav 1939 Late Ramesside Letters. (=  Bibliotheca Aegyptiaca, IX.) Brussels: Édition de la Fondation Égyptologique Reine Élisabeth.Google Scholar
Meir = Blackman, Aylward Manley 1914–1924 The Rock Tombs of Meir. London: Egypt Exploration Fund.Google Scholar
M. u. K. = Erman, Adolf 1901 Zaubersprüche für Mutter und Kind: aus dem Papyrus 3027 des Berliner Museums. (= Abhandlungen der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1901). Berlin: Verlag der Königl, Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
oAsh.Mus. 269 Černý, Jaroslav. Notebook 31.71.
oCairo 25667 = Černý, Jaroslav 1935 Ostraca hiératiques. Cairo: Impr. de l’IFAO.Google Scholar
oDeM 10061 = Grandet, Pierre 2006 Catalogue des ostraca hiératiques non littéraires de Deîr el-Médînéh. Tome X: nos 10001 – 10123. (= Documents de fouilles de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale 46. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Onchsh. = Glanville, S. R. K. 1955 The Instructions of 'Onchsheshonqy (British Museum Papyrus 10508) Part I: Introduction, Translation, Notes, and Plates. (= Catalogue of Demotic Papyri in the British Museum 2. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
pAsh.Mus. 1945.95 = Černý, Jaroslav 1945 The Will of Naunakhte and the Related Documents. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 311.29–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
pBerlin P 10018 = Luft, Ulrich 2006 Urkunden zur Chronologie der späten 12. Dynastie: Briefe aus Illahun. (=  Contributions to the Chronology of the Eastern Mediterranean, 7; Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Denkschriften der Gesamtakademie, 34.) Wien: Verl. der Österr. Akad. der Wiss.Google Scholar
pBerlin P 10038A = Luft, Ulrich 1992 Das Archiv von Illahun: Briefe 1. (= Hieratische Papyri aus den Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin Preußischer Kulturbesitz 1). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
pBerlin P 13562 = Zauzich, Karl-Theodor 1993 Papyri von der Insel Elephantine. (= Demotische Papyri aus den Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin 3). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
pBoulaq IV = Quack, Joachim Fr 1994 Die Lehren des Ani: ein neuägyptischer Weisheitstext in seinem kulturellen Umfeld. (= Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 141). Freiburg/Göttingen: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
pDeM = Černý, Jaroslav 1978 Papyrus hiératiques de Deir el-Médineh I: Nos I-XVII. (= Documents de fouilles de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale 8) ed. by Georges Posener. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
pEbers = Wreszinski, Walter 1913 Der Papyrus Ebers: Umschrift, Übersetzung und Kommentar. (= Die Medizin der alten Ägypter 3. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs.Google Scholar
pMagLL = Griffith, Francis Llewellyn & Herbert Thompson 1904–1909 The Demotic Magical Papyri of London and Leiden. London: H. Grevel & Co.Google Scholar
pRylands 9 = Vittmann, Günther 1998 Der demotische Papyrus Rylands 9. Teil I: Text und Übersetzung. Teil II: Kommentare und Indizes. (= Ägypten und Altes Testament 38). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Ptahh. = Žába, Zbynĕk 1956 Les maximes de Ptahhotep: Texte, traduction et commentaire. Prague.Google Scholar
Setne = Griffith, Francis Llewellyn 1900 Stories of the High Priests of Memphis: The Sethon of Herodotus and the Demotic Tales of Khamuas. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Goldbrunner, Sara 2006 Der verblendete Gelehrte. (=  Demotische Studien, 13.) Sommerhausen: Gisela Zauzich Verlag.Google Scholar
Sh.S. = Blackman, Aylward M. 1932 Middle-Egyptian Stories, Part 1. (=  Bibliotheca Aegyptiaca, 2.) Bruxelles: Édition de la Fondation Égyptologique Reine Élisabeth.Google Scholar
stCairo CG 20057 = Lange, Hans O. & Heinrich Schäfer 1902 Grab‑ und Denksteine des Mittleren Reichs im Museum von Kairo, No. 20001–20780. Theil I: 20001–20399. (= Catalogue Général des Antiquités Égyptiennes du Musée du Caire). Berlin: Reichsdruckerei.Google Scholar
stLeiden V.4 = Boeser, Pieter Adriaan Aart 1905–1908 Die Denkmäler des Alten Reiches. (= Beschreibung der Ägyptischen Sammlung des Niederländischen Reichsmuseums der Altertümer in Leiden, 1.) Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Urk. IV = Sethe, Kurt & Wolfgang Helck 1914–1961 Urkunden des ägyptischen Altertums IV. Urkunden der 18. Dynastie. Leipzig & Graz.Google Scholar

References

Allen, James P.
2010 Middle Egyptian: An Introduction to the Language and Culture of Hieroglyphs (Second Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, Harald
1992 Quantitative Aspects of Morphological Productivity. Yearbook of Morphology 1991 ed. by Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle, 109–149. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 On Frequency, Transparency and Productivity. Yearbook of Morphology 1992 ed. by Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle, 181–208. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald
2009 Corpus Linguistics in Morphology: Morphological Productivity. Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook ed. by Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö, 900–919. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Johanna
2006 Predicting the Productivity of Argument Structure Constructions. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 32:1.467–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2011 Statistical Modeling of Language Universals. Linguistic Typology 15:2.401–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Distributional Typology: Statistical Inquiries into the Dynamics of Linguistic Diversity. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (Second Edition) ed. by Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog, 901–923. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols
2007 Inflectional Morphology. Language Typology and Syntactic Description (Second Edition), Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon ed. by Timothy Shopen, 169–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Zúñiga, Fernando
2017 The ‘Word’ in Polysynthetic Languages: Phonological and Syntactic Challenges. The Oxford Handbook of Polysynthesis ed. by Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans, 158–186. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter
2015 Problems with Primary vs. Secondary Grammaticalization: The Case of East and Mainland Southeast Asian Languages. Language Sciences 47:B.132–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette
2004 Evolutionary Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Natural and Unnatural Sound Patterns: A Pocket Field Guide. Naturalness and Iconicity in Language ed. by Klaas Willems & Ludovic De Cuypere, 121–148. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Another Universal Bites the Dust: Northwest Mekeo Lacks Coronal Phonemes. Oceanic Linguistics 48:1.264–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Areal Sound Patterns: From Perceptual Magnets to Stone Soup. The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics ed. by Raymond Hickey, 55–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borghouts, Joris F.
1980 Object Pronouns of the ‑Type in Late Egyptian. Orientalia Lovaniensia Periodica Leuven 111.99–109.Google Scholar
2010 Egyptian: An Introduction to the Writing and Language of the Middle Kingdom (2 volumes). (=  Egyptologische Uitgaven, 24.) Leiden/Leuven: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten/Peeters.Google Scholar
Breban, Tine
2014 What is Secondary Grammaticalization? Trying to See the Wood for the Trees in a Confusion of Interpretations. Folia Linguistica 48:2.469–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brose, Mark
2014 Grammatik der dokumentarischen Texte des Mittleren Reiches. (=  Lingua Aegyptia Studia Monographica, 13.) Hamburg: Widmaier.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1985 Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
2008 Formal Universals as Emergent Phenomena: The Origins of Structure Preservation. In Jeff Good, ed., 108–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., William Pagliuca & Revere D. Perkins
1990 On the Asymmetries in the Affixation of Grammatical Material. Studies in Typology and Diachrony: Papers Presented to Joseph H. Greenberg on his 75th Birthday ed. by William A. Croft, Suzanne Kemmer & Keith Denning, 1–42. (=  Typological Studies in Language, 20.) Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caballero, Gabriela, Michael J. Houser, Nicole Marcus, Teresa McFarland, Anne Pycha, Maziar Toosarvandani & Johanna Nichols
2008 Nonsyntactic Ordering Effects in Noun Incorporation. Linguistic Typology 12:3.383–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cassonnet, Patricia
2000 Études de néo-égyptien: les temps seconds et entre syntaxe et sémantique. (=  Études et mémoires d’égyptologie, 1.) Paris: Cybèle.Google Scholar
Černý, Jaroslav & Sarah Israelit Groll
1984 A Late Egyptian Grammar (Third Edition). (=  Studia Pohl Series Maior, 4.) Rome: Biblical Institute Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Mark
2014 Antiphrastic Questions with ist and is in Late Egyptian. In Eitan Grossman, Stéphane Polis, Andréas Stauder & Jean Winand, eds., 7–40.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2008 Direct and Indirect Explanations of Typological Regularities: The Case of Alignment Variation. Folia Linguistica 42:1–2.1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2013 The Referential Hierarchy: Reviewing the Evidence in Diachronic Perspective. Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska ed. by Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath, 69–93. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Competing Motivation Models and Diachrony: What Evidence for What Motivations? Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage ed. by Brian MacWhinney, Andrej L. Malchukov & Edith A. Moravcsik, 282–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Implicational Universals and Dependencies Between Grammatical Phenomena. Dependencies in Language: On the Causal Ontology of Linguistic Systems ed. by Nick Enfield, 9–24. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Taking Diachronic Evidence Seriously: Result-Oriented vs. Source-Oriented Explanations of Typological Universals. Explanation in Typology: Diachronic Sources, Functional Motivations and the Nature of the Evidence ed. by Karsten Schmidtke-Bode, Natalia Levshina, Susanne Maria Michaelis & Ilja A. Seržant Berlin Language Science Press
Cutler, Ann, John Hawkins & Gary Gilligan
1985 The Suffixing Preference: A Processing Explanation. Linguistics 23:5.723–758. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cysouw, Michael
2003 The Paradigmatic Structure of Person Marking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2009 The Asymmetry of Affixation. Snippets 201.10–14. Available at [URL]
Depuydt, Leo
1993 Conjunction, Contiguity, Contingency: On Relationships Between Events in the Egyptian and Coptic Verbal Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Di Biase-Dyson, Camilla, Frank Kammerzell & Daniel A. Werning
2009 Glossing Ancient Egyptian: Suggestions for Adapting the Leipzig Glossing Rules. Lingua Aegyptia 171.343–366.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
2013a Prefixing vs. Suffixing in Inflectional Morphology. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath, eds., Ch. 26. Available at [URL]
2013b Coding of Nominal Plurality. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath, eds., Ch. 33. Available at [URL]
2013c Position of Case Affixes. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath, eds., Ch. 51. Available at [URL]
2013d Position of Tense-Aspect Affixes. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath, eds., Ch. 69. Available at [URL]
2013e Order of Adverbial Subordinator and Clause. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath, eds., Ch. 94. Available at [URL]
2013f Definite Articles. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath, eds., Ch. 37. Available at [URL]
2013g Indefinite Articles. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath, eds., Ch. 38. Available at [URL]
Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath
eds. 2013 The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Google Scholar
Egedi, Barbara
2010 Possessive Constructions in Egyptian and Coptic: Distribution, Definiteness, and the Construct State Phenomenon. Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde 137:1.1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engsheden, Åke
2006 Über die Markierung des direkten Objekts im Koptischen. Lingua Aegyptia 141.199–222.Google Scholar
2008 Differential Object Marking in Coptic. Forms and Functions: Aspect, Tense, Mood, Diathesis and Valency ed. by Folke Josephson & Ingmar Söhrman, 323–344. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Erman, Adolf
1933 Neuaegyptische Grammatik (Second Edition). Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Alan H.
1957 Egyptian Grammar Being an Introduction to the Study of Hieroglyphs (Third Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Shaya
Forthcoming. The Spread of the New Pronominal Possessive Construction: A Variationist Approach to the Letters of the Middle and New Kingdom. In Eitan Grossman & Stéphane Polis eds.
Gell-Mann, Murray & Meritt Ruhlen
2011 The Origin and Evolution of Word Order. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108:42.17290–17295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1971 Historical Syntax and Synchronic Morphology: An Archeologist’s Field Trip. Chicago Linguistic Society 7:1.394–415.Google Scholar
1981 On the Development of the Numeral ‘one’ as an Indefinite Marker. Folia Linguistica Historica 15:II/1.35–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Good, Jeff
ed. 2008 Linguistic Universals and Language Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, Michael
1987 The Coptic Share Pattern and its Ancient Egyptian Ancestors: A Reassessment of the Aorist Pattern in the Egyptian Language. Warminster: Aris & Phillips.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1957 Order of Affixing: A Study in General Linguistics. Essays in Linguistics, 86–97. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1966 Synchronic and Diachronic Universals in Phonology. Language 42:2.508–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978 Diachrony, Synchrony and Language Universals. Universals of Human Language, Vol. 1: Method and Theory ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsik, 61–92. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, Eitan
2009 Periphrastic Perfects in the Coptic Dialects: A Case Study in Grammaticalization. Lingua Aegyptia 171.81–118.Google Scholar
2015 No Case Before the Verb in Coptic. In Eitan Grossman, Martin Haspelmath & Tonio Sebastian Richter, eds., 203–225.Google Scholar
2016 From Rarum to Rarissimum: An Unexpected Zero Person Marker. Linguistic Typology 20:1.1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 Did Greek Influence the Coptic Preference for Prefixing? A Quantitative-Typological Perspective. Journal of Language Contact 11:1.1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Eitan, Anton Antonov & Guillaume Jacques
2018 A Cross-Linguistic Rarity in Synchrony and Diachrony: Adverbial Subordinator Prefixes Exist. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 71:4.513–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Eitan, Martin Haspelmath & Tonio Sebastian Richter
eds. 2015 Egyptian-Coptic Linguistics in Typological Perspective. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Eitan, Guillaume Lescuyer & Stéphane Polis
2014 Contexts and Inferences: The Grammaticalization of the Later Egyptian Allative Future. In Eitan Grossman, Stéphane Polis, Andréas Stauder & Jean Winand, eds., 87–136.Google Scholar
Grossman, Eitan & Stéphane Polis
2012 Navigating Polyfunctionality in the Lexicon: Semantic Maps and Ancient Egyptian Lexical Semantics. In Eitan Grossman, Stéphane Polis & Jean Winand, eds., 175–225.Google Scholar
eds. Forthcoming Possession in Ancient Egyptian The Mouton Companions to Ancient Egyptian, 1 Berlin De Gruyter
Grossman, Eitan, Stéphane Polis, Andréas Stauder & Jean Winand
eds. 2014 On Forms and Functions: Studies in Ancient Egyptian Grammar. Hamburg: Widmaier.Google Scholar
Grossman, Eitan, Stéphane Polis & Jean Winand
eds. 2012 Lexical Semantics in Ancient Egyptian. (=  Lingua Aegyptia Studia Monographica, 9.) Hamburg: Widmaier.Google Scholar
Hall, Christopher J.
1988 Integrating Diachronic and Processing Principles in Explaining the Suffixing Preference. Explaining Language Universals ed. by John A. Hawkins, 321–349. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice
2008 On the Explanation of Cross-Linguistically Unusual Structures. In Jeff Good, ed., 54–76.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993 The Diachronic Externalization of Inflection. Linguistics 31:2.279–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 Why is Grammaticalization Irreversible? Linguistics 37:6.1043–1068. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Parametric Versus Functional Explanations of Syntactic Universals. The Limits of Syntactic Variation ed. by Theresa Biberauer, 75–107. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 An Empirical Test of the Agglutination Hypothesis. Universals of Language Today ed. by Sergio Scalise, Elisabetta Magni & Antionietta Bisetto, 13–29. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 The Gradual Coalescence into ‘Words’ in Grammaticalization. The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization ed. by Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog, 342–355. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2013 Occurrence of Nominal Plurality. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath, eds., Ch. 34. Available at [URL]
2015 The Three Adnominal Possessive Constructions in Egyptian-Coptic: Three Degrees of Grammaticalization. In Eitan Grossman, Martin Haspelmath & Tonio Sebastian Richter, eds., 103–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018a The Last Word on Polysynthesis. Review of the book Oxford Handbook of Polysynthesis ed. by Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans. Linguistic Typology 22:2.307–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018b Revisiting the Anasynthetic Spiral. Grammaticalization and Language Typology ed. by Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog, 97–115. Oxford University Press.
Haspelmath, Martin, Andrea Calude, Michael Spagnol, Heiko Narrog & Elif Bamyaci
2014 Coding Causal-Noncausal Verb Alternations: A Form–Frequency Correspondence Explanation. Journal of Linguistics 50:3.587–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Andrea Sims
2010 Understanding Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. & Anne Cutler
1988 Psycholinguistic Factors in Morphological Asymmetry. Explaining Language Universals ed. by John A. Hawkins, 280–317. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. & Gary Gilligan
1988 Prefixing and Suffixing Universals in Relation to Basic Word Order. Lingua 74:2–3.219–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1997 Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hintze, Fritz
1948 Die Haupttendenzen der ägyptischen Sprachentwicklung. Zeitschrift für Phonetik und Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 1:3.85–108.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2014 Asymmetries in the Prosodic Phrasing of Function Words: Another Look at the Suffixing Preference. Language 90:4.927–960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodge, Carleton T.
1970 The Linguistic Cycle. Language Sciences 13:7.1–7.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2011 A Panchronic Study of Aspirated Fricatives, with New Evidence from Pumi. Lingua 121:9.1518–1538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Harmonization and Disharmonization of Affix Ordering and Basic Word Order. Linguistic Typology 17:2.187–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Junge, Friedrich
2001 Late Egyptian Grammar: An Introduction trans. by David Warburton. Oxford: Griffith Institute.Google Scholar
Kahombo, Mateene
1992 Essai de grammaire du Kihunde. (=  Hamburger Beiträge zur Afrikanistik, 1.) Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
2008 Universals Constrain Change; Change Results in Typological Generalizations. In Jeff Good, ed., 23–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruchten, Jean-Marie
1999 From Middle Egyptian to Late Egyptian. Lingua Aegyptia 61.1–97.Google Scholar
2000 Assimilation and Dissimilation at Work in the Late Egyptian Verbal System: The Verb Forms Built by Means of the Auxiliary iri from the Second Part of the Nineteenth Dynasty until Early Demotic. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 86:1.57–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Les serments des stèles frontières d’Akhénaton: origine du Futur III & dynamique de l’apparition et de l’extension de l’auxiliaire . Lingua Aegyptia 181.131–167.Google Scholar
Lambdin, Thomas
1983 Introduction to Sahidic Coptic. Macon: Mercer University Press.Google Scholar
Layton, Bentley
2004 A Coptic Grammar: Sahidic Dialect. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2011 A Coptic Grammar ( Third Edition ). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Loprieno, Antonio
1988 On the Typological Order of Constituents in Egyptian. Journal of Afroasiatic Languages 11.26–57.Google Scholar
1995 Ancient Egyptian: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 From VSO to SVO? Word Order and Rear Extraposition in Coptic. Stability, Variation and Change of Word Order Patterns over Time ed. by Rosanna Sornicola, Erich Poppe & Ariel Shisha-Halevy, 23–39. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loprieno, Antonio, Matthias Müller & Sami Uljas
2017 Non-Verbal Predication in Ancient Egyptian. (=  The Mouton Companions to Ancient Egyptian, 2.) Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron
2014 Why is the Borrowing of Inflectional Morphology Dispreferred? Borrowed Morphology ed. by Nino Amiridze, Peter Arkadiev & Francesco Gardani, 47–80. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron & Jeanette Sakel
2007 Investigating the Mechanisms of Pattern Replication in Language Convergence. Studies in Language 31:4.829–865. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattha, Girgis
1947 The Origin of the Explanatory Particles and . Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale 451.61–64.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2003 Why Prefixes? Acta Linguistica Hungarica 50:1–2.155–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1986 Head-Marking and Dependent-Marking Grammar. Language 62:1.56–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Diversity and Stability in Language. Handbook of Historical Linguistics ed. by Richard D. Janda & Brian D. Joseph, 283–310. London: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna & Balthasar Bickel
2013 Locus of Marking: Whole-language Typology. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath, eds., Ch. 25. Available at [URL]
Nikolaev, Dmitry & Eitan Grossman
2018 Areal Sound Change and the Distributional Typology of Affricate Richness in Eurasia. Studies in Language 42:3.562–599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel
2009 Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oréal, Elsa
2011 Les particules en égyptien ancien: De l’ancien égyptien à l’égyptien classique. (=  Bibliothèque d’Étude, 152.) Cairo: Institut français d'archéologie orientale du Caire.Google Scholar
Peust, Carsten
1999 Egyptian Phonology: An Introduction to the Phonology of a Dead Language. (=  Monographien zur Ägyptischen Sprache, 2.) Göttingen: Peust & Gutschmidt.Google Scholar
Plumley, Martin J.
1948 Introductory Coptic Grammar. London: Home & Van Thal.Google Scholar
Polis, Stéphane
2005 Les formes “contingentes” en ancien égyptien: une catégorisation en question. La langue dans tous ses états: Michel Malaise in honorem ed. by Christian Cannuyer, A. Schoors, René Lebrun, Jean-Marie Verpoorten & Jean Winand, 301–322. Bruxelles: Société belge d’études orientales.Google Scholar
Polotsky, Hans-Jakob
1940 Une règle concernant l’emploi des forms verbales dans la phrase interrogative en néo-égyptien. Annales du Service des Antiquités de l’Égypte 401.33–37.Google Scholar
Polotsky, Hans J.
1944 Études de syntaxe copte. Cairo: Publications de la Société d’Archéologie Copte.Google Scholar
Quack, Joachim Friedrich
2006 En route vers le copte: notes sur l’évolution du démotique tardif. Faits de langues 271.191–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reintges, Chris
2003 Syntactic Conditions on Special Inflection in Coptic Interrogatives. Research in Afroasiatic Grammar II: Selected Papers from the Fifth Conference on Afroasiatic Languages, Paris, 2000 ed. by Jacqueline Lecarme, 363–408. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Coptic Egyptian (Sahidic Dialect): A Learner’s Grammar. (=  Afrikawissenschaftliche Lehrbücher, 15.) Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
2013 Sapirian “Drift” Towards Analyticity and Long-Term Morphosyntactic Change in Ancient Egyptian. Historical Linguistics 2011: Selected Papers from the 20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Osaka, 25–30 July 2011 ed. by Ritsuko Kikusawa & Lawrence A. Reid, 289–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richter, Tonio Sebastian
2009 Greek, Coptic, and the ‘Language of the Hijra’: The Rise and Decline of the Coptic Language in Late Antique and Medieval Egypt. From Hellenism to Islam: Cultural and Linguistic Change in the Roman Near East ed. by Hannah M. Cotton, Robert G. Hoyland, Jonathan J. Price & David J. Wasserstein, 402–447. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921 Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank
2013 AfBo: A World-Wide Survey of Affix Borrowing. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available at [URL]. Last accessed 18 August 2017.
2015 Direct and Indirect Affix Borrowing. Language 91:3.511–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shisha-Halevy, Ariel
1986 Coptic Grammatical Categories: Structural Studies in the Syntax of Shenoutean Coptic. (=  Analecta Orientalia, 53.) Rome: The Pontifical Institute.Google Scholar
2000 Stability in Clausal/Phrasal Pattern Constituent Sequencing: 4000 Years of Egyptian (With Some Theoretical Reflections, Also on Celtic). Stability, Variation and Change of Word-Order Patterns over Time ed. by Rosanna Sornicola, Erich Poppe & Ariel Shisha-Halevy, 71–100. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Determination-Signalling Environment in Old and Middle Egyptian: Work-Notes and Reflections. Studies in Semitic and General Linguistics in Honor of Gideon Goldenberg ed. by Tali Bar & Eran Cohen, 223–254. (=  Alter Orient und Altes Testament, 334.) Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna & Dik Bakker
1996 The Distribution of Subject and Object Agreement and Word Order Type. Studies in Language 20:1.115–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverman, David P.
1980 Interrogative Constructions with JN and JN-JW in Old and Middle Egyptian. (=  Bibliotheca Aegyptia, 1.) Malibu: Undena Publications.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. S.
1996 Demotic Grammar in the Ptolemaic Sacerdotal Decrees. (=  Griffith Institute Monographs, 1.) Oxford: Griffith Institute, Ashmolean Museum.Google Scholar
Sojic, Nathalie
Forthcoming. The Emergence of the Possessive Determiner in Ancient Egyptian. In Eitan Grossman & Stéphane Polis eds.
Spiegelberg, Wilhelm
1925 Demotische Grammatik. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Stauder, Andréas
2017 L’origine du pronom sujet néo-égyptien (tw , twk, sw, etc.). Revue d’égyptologie 671.141–156.Google Scholar
Teferra, Anbessa & Grover Hudson
2007 Essentials of Amharic. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Topping, Donald M.
1973 Chamorro Reference Grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Uljas, Sami
2009 Adverbial Sentence WH-questions in Earlier Egyptian. Revue d’Égyptologie 601.147–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Begging the Question: Earlier Egyptian WH-questions and the Marking of Information Structure. Lingua Aegyptia 201.253–266.Google Scholar
2016 On Clitics in Earlier Egyptian. Lingua Aegyptia 241.111–149.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek, Hendrik de Smet & Lobke Ghesquière
2013 On Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change [Special Issue]. Studies in Language 37:3.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan
2009 On the Diachrony of Negation. The Expression of Negation ed. by Laurence R. Horn, 73–109. (=  The Expression of Cognitive Categories, 4.) Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Vernus, Pascal
1988 L’Égypto-copte. Les langues dans le monde ancien et moderne, troisième partie: langues chamito-sémitiques ed. by David Cohen, 161–206. Paris: Ed. du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
1990 Future at Issue. Tense, Mood and Aspect in Middle Egyptian: Studies in Syntax and Semantics. ( Yale Egyptological Studies, 4.) New Haven: Yale Egyptological Seminar.Google Scholar
2006 Pronoms interrogatifs en égyptien de la première phase. Lingua Aegyptia 141.145–178.Google Scholar
Vuillermet, Marine
2018 Making the Case for a Morphosemantic Apprehensional Domain. Studies in Language 42:1.256–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werning, Daniel A.
2012 Ancient Egyptian Prepositions for the Expression of Spatial Relations and Their Translations: A Typological Approach. In Eitan Grossman, Stéphane Polis & Jean Winand, eds., 293–346.Google Scholar
Winand, Jean
1992 Études de néo-égyptien, 1: La morphologie verbale. (=  Aegyptiaca Leodiensia, 2.) Liège: Centre Informatique de Philosophie et Lettres.Google Scholar
1997 La négation en néo-égyptien. Lingua Aegyptia 51.223–236.Google Scholar
2015 The Oblique Expression of the Object in Ancient Egyptian. In Eitan Grossman, Martin Haspelmath & Tonio Sebastian Richter, eds., 533–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Pronominal Non-Predicative Possession in Late Egyptian. In Eitan Grossman & Stéphane Polis eds.
Yu, Alan
2007 A Natural History of Infixation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Brody, Parker L.
2019. Morphological exceptionality and pathways of change. Journal of Historical Linguistics 9:3 ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Cristofaro, Sonia
2024. Diachronic pathways to case marking alignment and what they mean for the explanation of synchronic cross-linguistic patterns. Journal of Historical Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Inglese, Guglielmo
2023. The rise of middle voice systems. Diachronica 40:2 ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Lai, Yunfan
2021. Betrayal through obedience: on the history of the unusual inflectional chain in Siyuewu Khroskyabs. Linguistic Typology 25:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.