Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 13:2 (2023) ► pp.295–325

Regularity of semantic change in Romance anatomical terms

| Brigham Young University
While semantic change is notoriously idiosyncratic, cross-linguistic evidence suggests some general trends in the directions and mechanisms of semantic shifts. Notable among these are trends applying to the target domain of the human body, a domain that has received considerable attention due to its universality. However, broad surveys of many languages risk missing significant details. Data from the Dictionnaire étymologique et cognitif des langues romanes (DECOLAR) on the etymologies of terms for 97 body parts in 14 Romance languages calls some proposed trends into question. In particular, counterexamples are found to a supposed unidirectional shift from visible parts to the wholes that include them. Analysis of individual changes reveals contextual factors that can cause a lexical trend to not apply. The findings contribute to a more complex model of metaphorization and metonymization, the primary processes involved in lexical semantic change.
Keywords: semantics, lexical change, lexical typology, metonymy, metaphor
Article outline
  • 1.Uncertainty about trends in lexico-semantic change
  • 2.Trends in semantic change in the domain of human anatomy
  • 3.Data
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Relative frequency of semantic change types
    • 4.2Trends in metaphor-driven semantic changes
    • 4.3Trends in metonymy-driven semantic changes
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Relative frequency of interfield metonymy and metaphor
    • 5.2Shifts between visible parts and wholes
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 21 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.21046.law
References (58)
References
Alonso, María Angeles, Angel Fernandez & Emiliano Díez. 2015. Subjective Age-of-Acquisition Norms for 7,039 Spanish Words. Behavior Research Methods 47:1. 268–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Elaine S. 1978. Lexical Universals of Body-Part Terminology. Universals of Human Language, Vol. 3: Word Structure ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, 335–368. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
André, Jacques. 1991. Le vocabulaire latin de l’anatomie. (= Collection d’études anciennes, 59.) Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Barcelona, Antonio. 2002. Clarifying and Applying the Notions of Metaphor and Metonymy within Cognitive Linguistics: An Update. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast ed. by René Dirven & Ralf Pörings, 207–277. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Brent. 1992. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Brent & Paul Kay. 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bierwiaczonek, Boguslaw. 2013. Metonymy in Language, Thought and Brain. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Blank, Andreas. 1997. Les adjectifs temporels du type long/court dans les langues romanes: un cas de ‘métaphoricité étroite.’ L’organisation lexicale et cognitive des dimensions spatiale et temporelle: actes d’EUROSEM 1996 ed. by Marie-Jeanne Montibus, 15–37. Reims: Éditions et Presses Universitaires de Reims.Google Scholar
. 2003. Words and Concepts in Time: Towards Diachronic Cognitive Onomasiology. Words in Time: Diachronic Semantics from Different Points of View ed. by Regine Eckardt, Klaus Von Heusinger & Christoph Schwarze, 37–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Cecil H. 1976. General Principles of Human Anatomical Partonomy and Speculations on the Growth of Partonomic Nomenclature. American Ethnologist 3:3.400–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Cecil H. & Stanley R. Witkowski. 1981. Figurative Language in a Universalist Perspective. American Ethnologist 8:3.596–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1983. Polysemy, Lexical Change and Cultural Importance. Man 18:1.72–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas. 2006. Body Part Terms in Jahai. Language Sciences (Parts of the Body: Cross-Linguistic Categorisation) 28:2.162–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameirão, Manuela L. & Selene G. Vicente. 2010. Age-of-Acquisition Norms for a Set of 1,749 Portuguese Words. Behavior Research Methods 42:2.474–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 1993. The Role of Domains in the Interpretation of Metaphors and Metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics 4:4.335–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Della Rosa, Pasquale A., Eleonora Catricalà, Gabriella Vigliocco & Stefano F. Cappa. 2010. Beyond the Abstract – Concrete Dichotomy: Mode of Acquisition, Concreteness, Imageability, Familiarity, Age of Acquisition, Context Availability, and Abstractness Norms for a Set of 417 Italian Words. Behavior Research Methods 42:4.1042–1048. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubois, Jacques, Francis Edeline, Jean-Marie Klinkenberg, Philippe Minguet, François Pire & Hadelin Trinton. 1970. Rhétorique Générale. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Dubossarsky, Haim, Daphna Weinshall & Eitan Grossman. 2017. Outta Control: Laws of Semantic Change and Inherent Biases in Word Representation Models. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing ed. by Martha Palmer, Rebecca Hwa & Sebastian Riedel, 1136–1145. Copenhagen: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2006. Lao Body Part Terms. Language Sciences (Parts of the Body: Cross-Linguistic Categorisation) 28:2.181–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & David Wilkins. 2000. In the Mind’s Ear: The Semantic Extensions of Perception Verbs in Australian Languages. Language 76:3.546–592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrand, Ludovic, Patrick Bonin, Alain Méot, Maria Augustinova, Boris New, Christophe Pallier & Marc Brysbaert. 2008. Age-of-Acquisition and Subjective Frequency Estimates for All Generally Known Monosyllabic French Words and Their Relation with Other Psycholinguistic Variables. Behavior Research Methods 40:4.1049–1054. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gévaudan, Paul, Peter Koch & Antonia Neu. 2003. A Hundred Years after Zauner – Romance Names for Body Parts in the DECOLAR (Etymological and Cognitive Dictionary of the Romance Languages). Romanische Forschungen 115:1.1–27.Google Scholar
Gimenes, Manuel & Boris New. 2016. Worldlex: Twitter and Blog Word Frequencies for 66 Languages. Behavior Research Methods 48:3.963–972. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and Conversation. Syntax and Semantics, Vol 3 ed. by P. Cole & J. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, William L., Jure Leskovec & Dan Jurafsky. 2016. Diachronic Word Embeddings Reveal Statistical Laws of Semantic Change. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics ed. by Katrin Erk & Noah A. Smith, 1489–1501. Berlin: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardin, C. L. & Luisa Maffi. 1997. Color Categories in Thought and Language. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iris, M., B. Litowitz & M. W. Evens. 1988. Problems of the Part-Whole Relation. Relational Models of the Lexicon: Representing Knowledge in Semantic Networks ed. by M. W. Evens, 261–288. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul & Chad K. McDaniel. 1978. The Linguistic Significance of the Meanings of Basic Color Terms. Language 54:3.610–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, Peter. 2000. Pour une approche cognitive du changement sémantique lexical: aspect onomasiologique. Théories contemporaines du changement sémantique ed. by Jacques François, 75–97. (= Mémoires de la Société Linguistique de Paris, 9.) Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
. 2004. Diachronic Cognitive Onomasiology and Semantic Reconstruction. Lexical Data and Universals of Semantic Change ed. by Wiltrud Mihatsch & Reinhild Steinberg, 79–106. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Kraska-Szlenk, Iwona. 2014. Semantic Extensions of Body Part Terms: Common Patterns and Their Interpretation. Language Sciences 441.15–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lachaud, Christian Michel. 2007. CHACQFAM : une base de données renseignant l’âge d’acquisition estimé et la familiarité pour 1225 mots monosyllabiques et bisyllabiques du Français. L’Année psychologique 107:01.39–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1993. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. Metaphor and Thought ed. by Andrew Ortony, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Vol. 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1995. Three Levels of Meaning. Grammar and Meaning: Essays in Honour of Sir John Lyons ed. by Frank R. Palmer, 90–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Parts of the Body in Yélî Dnye, the Papuan Language of Rossel Island. Language Sciences (Parts of the Body: Cross-Linguistic Categorisation) 28:2.221–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1978. Variational Semantics in Tibeto-Burman: The “Organic” Approach to Linguistic Comparison. Vol. 61. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
McClure, Erica F. 1975. Ethno-Anatomy: The Structure of the Domain. Anthropological Linguistics 17:2.78–88.Google Scholar
Mihatsch, Wiltrud. 2004. Introduction. Lexical Data and Universals of Semantic Change ed. by Wiltrud Mihatsch & Reinhild Steinberg, 9–18. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte & David D. Clarke. 1992. Outline of a Model for Semantic Change. Diachrony within Synchrony: Language History and Cognition ed. by Günter Kellermann & Michael D. Morrissey, 125–144. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Nerlove, Sara & A. Kimball Romney. 1967. Sibling Terminology and Cross-Sex Behavior. American Anthropologist 69:2.179–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Gary B. & Lawrence Nicodemus. 1985. Coeur d’Alene Exceptions to Proposed Universals of Anatomical Nomenclature. American Ethnologist 12:2.341–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1956. Logic as Semiotic: The Theory of Signs. The Philosophy of Peirce: Selected Writings ed. by Justus Buchler. 3rd ed. London: Rutledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2021. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Online: [URL]
Sebeok, Thomas. 1976. Iconicity. Comparative Literature 91:6.1427–1456.Google Scholar
Seto, Ken-ichi. 1999. Distinguishing Metonymy from Synecdoche. Metonymy in Language and Thought ed. by Klaus-Uwe Panther & Günter Radden, 91–120. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. (= Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 54.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terrill, Angela. 2006. Body Part Terms in Lavukaleve, a Papuan language of the Solomon Islands. Language Sciences (Parts of the Body: Cross-Linguistic Categorisation) 28:2.304–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard B. Dasher. 2001. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1988. Pragmatic Strengthening and Grammaticalization. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society ed. by Annie Jaisser, Helen Singmaster & Shelley Axmaker, 406–416. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Max Leopold. 1960. Dizionario etimologico sardo. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Wegener, Claudia. 2006. Savosavo Body Part Terminology. Language Sciences (Parts of the Body: Cross-Linguistic Categorisation) 28:2.344–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, David. 1996. Natural Tendencies of Semantic Change and the Search for Cognates. The Comparative Method Reviewed: Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change ed. by Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross, 264–306. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Joseph M. 1976. Synaesthetic Adjectives: A Possible Law of Semantic Change. Language 52:2.461–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witkowski, Stanley R. & Cecil H. Brown. 1985. Climate, Clothing, and Body-Part Nomenclature. Ethnology 24:3.197–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar