Article published in:
Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its DevelopmentGuest-edited by Leonid Kulikov and Nikolaos Lavidas
[Journal of Historical Linguistics 3:1] 2013
► pp. 122–152
Toward a syntactic phylogeny of modern Indo-European languages
Giuseppe Longobardi | University of Trieste
Cristina Guardiano | University of York
Giuseppina Silvestri | University of Modena e Reggio Emilia
Alessio Boattini | University of Pisa
Andrea Ceolin | University of Bologna
The Parametric Comparison Method (PCM, Guardiano & Longobardi 2005, Longobardi & Guardiano 2009) is grounded on the assumption that syntactic parameters are more appropriate than other traits for use as comparanda for historical reconstruction, because they are able to provide unambiguous correspondences and objective measurements, thus guaranteeing wide-range applicability and quantitative exactness. This article discusses a set of experiments explicitly designed to evaluate the impact of parametric syntax in representing historical relatedness, and performed on a selection of 26 contemporary Indo-European varieties. The results show that PCM is in fact able to correctly identify genealogical relations even from modern languages only, performing as accurately as lexical methods, and that its effectiveness is not limited by interference effects such as ‘horizontal’ transmission. PCM is thus validated as a powerful tool for the analysis of historical relationships not only on a long-range perspective (as suggested by Longobardi & Guardiano 2009), but even on more focused, though independently well-known domains.
Keywords: Parametric Comparison Method, syntactic distances, historical reconstruction, nominal domain, quantitative phylogenies
Published online: 02 August 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.3.1.07lon
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.3.1.07lon
Cited by
Cited by 23 other publications
Andriani, Luigi, Kim A. Groothuis & Giuseppina Silvestri
2020. Pathways of Grammaticalisation in Italo-Romance.
Probus 32:2 ► pp. 327 ff. 
Bakker, Peter, Eeva Sippola & Finn Borchsenius
2017.
In Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches,
► pp. 59 ff.
Cathcart, Chundra A.
2022.
DIALECTAL LAYERS IN WEST IRANIAN: A HIERARCHICAL DIRICHLET PROCESS APPROACH TO LINGUISTIC RELATIONSHIPS
1
.
Transactions of the Philological Society
Ceolin, Andrea
2019. Significance testing of the Altaic family.
Diachronica 36:3 ► pp. 299 ff.
Ceolin, Andrea, Cristina Guardiano, Monica Alexandrina Irimia & Giuseppe Longobardi
2020. Formal Syntax and Deep History.
Frontiers in Psychology 11
Da Milano, Federica & Nicoletta Puddu
2016.
In Understanding Cultural Traits,
► pp. 341 ff.
Franzoi, Laura, Andrea Sgarro, Anca Dinu & Liviu P. Dinu
2020.
In Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1239],
► pp. 17 ff.
Guardiano, Cristina, Giuseppe Longobardi, Guido Cordoni & Paola Crisma
2020.
In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics,
► pp. 145 ff.
Guardiano, Cristina, Dimitris Michelioudakis, Guido Cordoni, Monica Alexandrina Irimia, Nina Radkevich & Ioanna Sitaridou
2018.
In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 14 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 14],
► pp. 103 ff.
Jäger, Gerhard
2015. Support for linguistic macrofamilies from weighted sequence alignment.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112:41 ► pp. 12752 ff.
Ledgeway, Adam & Ian Roberts
2020. Introduction.
Probus 32:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
List, Johann‐Mattis, Shijulal Nelson‐Sathi, Hans Geisler & William Martin
2014. Networks of lexical borrowing and lateral gene transfer in language and genome evolution.
BioEssays 36:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
Longobardi, Giuseppe, Silvia Ghirotto, Cristina Guardiano, Francesca Tassi, Andrea Benazzo, Andrea Ceolin & Guido Barbujani
2015.
Across language families: Genome diversity mirrors linguistic variation within
E
urope
.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology 157:4 ► pp. 630 ff.
Marcolli, Matilde
2016. Syntactic Parameters and a Coding Theory Perspective on Entropy and Complexity of Language Families.
Entropy 18:4 ► pp. 110 ff.
Ortegaray, Andrew, Robert C. Berwick & Matilde Marcolli
2021. Heat Kernel Analysis of Syntactic Structures.
Mathematics in Computer Science 15:4 ► pp. 643 ff.
Oschwald, Jessica, Alisa Schättin, Claudia C. von Bastian & Alessandra S. Souza
2018. Bidialectalism and Bilingualism: Exploring the Role of Language Similarity as a Link Between Linguistic Ability and Executive Control.
Frontiers in Psychology 9
Pakendorf, Brigitte
2014. Coevolution of languages and genes.
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 29 ► pp. 39 ff.
Port, Alexander, Taelin Karidi & Matilde Marcolli
2022. Topological Analysis of Syntactic Structures.
Mathematics in Computer Science 16:1
Santos, Patrícia, Gloria Gonzàlez-Fortes, Emiliano Trucchi, Andrea Ceolin, Guido Cordoni, Cristina Guardiano, Giuseppe Longobardi & Guido Barbujani
2020. More Rule than Exception: Parallel Evidence of Ancient Migrations in Grammars and Genomes of Finno-Ugric Speakers.
Genes 11:12 ► pp. 1491 ff.
Shu, Kevin, Sharjeel Aziz, Vy-Luan Huynh, David Warrick & Matilde Marcolli
2018.
In Foundations of Mathematics and Physics One Century After Hilbert,
► pp. 417 ff.
Shu, Kevin & Matilde Marcolli
2017. Syntactic Structures and Code Parameters.
Mathematics in Computer Science 11:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Shu, Kevin, Andrew Ortegaray, Robert C. Berwick & Matilde Marcolli
2021. Phylogenetics of Indo-European Language Families via an Algebro-Geometric Analysis of Their Syntactic Structures.
Mathematics in Computer Science 15:4 ► pp. 803 ff.
Willems, Matthieu, Etienne Lord, Louise Laforest, Gilbert Labelle, François-Joseph Lapointe, Anna Maria Di Sciullo & Vladimir Makarenkov
2016. Using hybridization networks to retrace the evolution of Indo-European languages.
BMC Evolutionary Biology 16:1
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.