Toward a syntactic phylogeny of modern Indo-European languages

Giuseppe Longobardi | University of Trieste

Cristina Guardiano | University of York

Giuseppina Silvestri | University of Modena e Reggio Emilia

Alessio Boattini | University of Pisa

Andrea Ceolin | University of Bologna

The Parametric Comparison Method (PCM, Guardiano & Longobardi 2005, Longobardi & Guardiano 2009) is grounded on the assumption that syntactic parameters are more appropriate than other traits for use as comparanda for historical reconstruction, because they are able to provide unambiguous correspondences and objective measurements, thus guaranteeing wide-range applicability and quantitative exactness. This article discusses a set of experiments explicitly designed to evaluate the impact of parametric syntax in representing historical relatedness, and performed on a selection of 26 contemporary Indo-European varieties. The results show that PCM is in fact able to correctly identify genealogical relations even from modern languages only, performing as accurately as lexical methods, and that its effectiveness is not limited by interference effects such as ‘horizontal’ transmission. PCM is thus validated as a powerful tool for the analysis of historical relationships not only on a long-range perspective (as suggested by Longobardi & Guardiano 2009), but even on more focused, though independently well-known domains.

Keywords: Parametric Comparison Method, syntactic distances, historical reconstruction, nominal domain, quantitative phylogenies

Published online: 02 August 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.3.1.07lon

Cited by

Cited by 20 other publications

Bakker, Peter, Eeva Sippola & Finn Borchsenius

2017. In Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches, ► pp. 59 ff.

Ceolin, Andrea

2019. Significance testing of the Altaic family. Diachronica 36:3 ► pp. 299 ff.

Ceolin, Andrea, Cristina Guardiano, Monica Alexandrina Irimia & Giuseppe Longobardi

2020. Formal Syntax and Deep History. Frontiers in Psychology 11

Da Milano, Federica & Nicoletta Puddu

2016. In Understanding Cultural Traits, ► pp. 341 ff.

Franzoi, Laura, Andrea Sgarro, Anca Dinu & Liviu P. Dinu

2020. In Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1239], ► pp. 17 ff.

Guardiano, Cristina, Giuseppe Longobardi, Guido Cordoni & Paola Crisma

2020. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ► pp. 145 ff.

Guardiano, Cristina, Dimitris Michelioudakis, Guido Cordoni, Monica Alexandrina Irimia, Nina Radkevich & Ioanna Sitaridou

2018. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 14 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 14], ► pp. 103 ff.

Jäger, Gerhard

2015. Support for linguistic macrofamilies from weighted sequence alignment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112:41 ► pp. 12752 ff.

Ledgeway, Adam, Norma Schifano & Giuseppina Silvestri

2019. Differential Object Marking and the properties of D in the dialects of the extreme south of Italy. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1

List, Johann‐Mattis, Shijulal Nelson‐Sathi, Hans Geisler & William Martin

2014. Networks of lexical borrowing and lateral gene transfer in language and genome evolution. BioEssays 36:2 ► pp. 141 ff.

Longobardi, Giuseppe, Silvia Ghirotto, Cristina Guardiano, Francesca Tassi, Andrea Benazzo, Andrea Ceolin & Guido Barbujani

2015. Across language families: Genome diversity mirrors linguistic variation within E urope . American Journal of Physical Anthropology 157:4 ► pp. 630 ff.

Marcolli, Matilde

2016. Syntactic Parameters and a Coding Theory Perspective on Entropy and Complexity of Language Families. Entropy 18:4 ► pp. 110 ff.

Ortegaray, Andrew, Robert C. Berwick & Matilde Marcolli

2021. Heat Kernel Analysis of Syntactic Structures. Mathematics in Computer Science

Oschwald, Jessica, Alisa Schättin, Claudia C. von Bastian & Alessandra S. Souza

2018. Bidialectalism and Bilingualism: Exploring the Role of Language Similarity as a Link Between Linguistic Ability and Executive Control. Frontiers in Psychology 9

Pakendorf, Brigitte

2014. Coevolution of languages and genes. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 29 ► pp. 39 ff.

Santos, Patrícia, Gloria Gonzàlez-Fortes, Emiliano Trucchi, Andrea Ceolin, Guido Cordoni, Cristina Guardiano, Giuseppe Longobardi & Guido Barbujani

2020. More Rule than Exception: Parallel Evidence of Ancient Migrations in Grammars and Genomes of Finno-Ugric Speakers. Genes 11:12 ► pp. 1491 ff.

Shu, Kevin, Sharjeel Aziz, Vy-Luan Huynh, David Warrick & Matilde Marcolli

2018. In Foundations of Mathematics and Physics One Century After Hilbert, ► pp. 417 ff.

Shu, Kevin & Matilde Marcolli

2017. Syntactic Structures and Code Parameters. Mathematics in Computer Science 11:1 ► pp. 79 ff.

Shu, Kevin, Andrew Ortegaray, Robert C. Berwick & Matilde Marcolli

2021. Phylogenetics of Indo-European Language Families via an Algebro-Geometric Analysis of Their Syntactic Structures. Mathematics in Computer Science

Willems, Matthieu, Etienne Lord, Louise Laforest, Gilbert Labelle, François-Joseph Lapointe, Anna Maria Di Sciullo & Vladimir Makarenkov

2016. Using hybridization networks to retrace the evolution of Indo-European languages. BMC Evolutionary Biology 16:1

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.