Cover not available
Article published In:
The Diachrony of Infinitival Patterns: Their origin, development and loss
Edited by Ulrike Demske and Łukasz Jędrzejowski
[Journal of Historical Linguistics 5:1] 2015
► pp. 139–174

The decline of non-finiteness as a syntactic mechanism for embedding in East Slavic

| University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU
This article focuses on how and why non-finite structures weakened as a productive device for embedding in East Slavic and became replaced by an alternative system of finite CPs in many syntactic contexts. The relevant structures analyzed here are infinitive clauses and participial (absolute) constructions. Both constructions were available in almost any embedded context in early Slavic (Old Church Slavonic and Old Russian). However, in later stages (Middle Russian and Modern Russian) embedded infinitive constructions became severely restricted, while absolute constructions disappeared altogether. In order to account for this change, I review a series of conditions that preceded the decline process analyzed here and propose a final trigger for the emergence of a new system of non-finiteness in modern Russian; namely, I explore the possibility that the change in the pro-drop character of Russian turned embedded infinitive clauses into Obligatory Control structures, and forced every other non-finite structure to be replaced by an alternative (finite) embedding device.
Keywords: East Slavic, Russian, dative subjects, pro-drop, syntactic change, embedded structures, non-finiteness, infinitive clauses, absolute constructions
Published online: 28 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.5.1.05mad
References (76)
Anthology of 1076 : Golyšenko, V.S. & S.I. Kotkov eds. 1965. Izbornik 1076 goda. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Avvakum’s Life : Gudzija, N.K. ed. 1960. Žitie protopopa Avvakuma im samim napisannoe i drugie ego sočinenija. Moscow.Google Scholar
Codex Assemanianus : Kurz, J. ed. 1955. Evangeliář Assemanův. Kodex Vatikánský 3. slovanský, Díl II. Prague: TITUS. Available at [URL].Google Scholar
Codex Marianus : Jagić, V. ed. 1883. Quattuor evangeliorum versionis palaeoslovenicae codex Marianus glagoliticus. Saint Petersburg: TITUS. Available at [URL]Google Scholar
Codex Suprasliensis : Sever’janov, S. ed. 1904. Suprasl’skaja rukopis’. Tom I [-II] (Pamjatniki Staroslavjanskago Jazyka, Tom II, 1-2). Saint Petersburg: TITUS. Available at [URL].Google Scholar
Hilarion’s sermon : Sreznevskij, V.I. ed. 1893. Slovo Ilariona o zakone i blagodati. Musin-Puškinskij sbornik 1414. Saint Petersburg.Google Scholar
Joseph of Volokolamsk’s instructions : Kazakova, N.A. & J.S. Lur’e eds. 1955 Poslanija Iosifa Volockogo Vasiliju III. Antifeodal’nye eretičeskie dviženija na Rusi XIV–načala XVI veka, 513–520. Moscow & Leningrad.Google Scholar
Laurentian Chronicle : Karskij, Je. F. red. 2001 [11926–28] Lavrent’evskaja letopis’ (Polnoe sobranie russkix letopisej, I), 1–286. Moscow.Google Scholar
Life of St. Theodosius : Šaxmatov, A.A. & P.A. Lavrov eds. 1899. Žitie Feodosija Pečerskogo po Uspenskomu sborniku XII veka. Sbornik XII veka Moskovskogo Uspenskogo sobora. Moscow.Google Scholar
Metropolitan Cyprian’s sermon : Archeographic Committee ed. 1841. Poučenie mitropolita Kipriana. Akty Istoričeskie, Tom I (1334–1598). Saint Petersburg.Google Scholar
Moscow Letters : Kotkov, S.I. A.S. Orešnikov & I.S. Filippova, eds. 1968. Moskovskaja delovaja i bytovaja pis’mennost’ načala XVII veka. Moscow.Google Scholar
1st Novgorod Chronicle : Nasonov, A.N. red. 2000 [11950]. Novgorodskaja pervaja letopis’ staršego izvoda. Sinodal’nyj spisok. Novgorodskaja Pervaja Letopis’ staršego i mladšego izvodov ( Polnoe sobranie russkix letopisej, III), 13–100. Moscow.Google Scholar
Old Russian Right : Grekov, B.D. ed. 1940. Pravda Russkaja. Moscow: TITUS. Available at [URL].Google Scholar
Sinodal Patericon : Kotkov, S.I. et al. eds. 1967. Sinajskij Paterik. Moscow.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning. 1970. The Dative of Subordination in Baltic and Slavic. Baltic Linguistics ed. by Thomas F. Magner & William R. Schmalstieg, 1–9. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Bailyn, John F. 2012. The Syntax of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bar-Shalom, Eva & William Snyder. 1997. Optional Infinitives in Russian and Their Implications for the Pro-Drop Debate. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 5: The Indiana Meeting ed. by Martina Lindseth & Steven Franks, 38–47. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Mara Frascarelli. 2010. Is Topic a Root Phenomenon? Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2:1.43–88.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric & Norbert Hornstein. 2007. On (Non-)Obligatory Control. New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising ed. by William D. Davis & Stanley Dubinsky, 251–262. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric, Norbert Hornstein & Jairo Nunes. 2010. Control as Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borkosvskij, V.I. 1968. Sravnitel’no-istoričeskij sintaksis vostočno-slavjanskix jazykov I-I. Tipy prostogo predloženija [Compared Historical Syntax of the East Slavic Languages: Types of Non-Embedded Clauses]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Borkovskij, V.I. 1978. Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka: sintaksis—prostoe predloženie [Historical Grammar of the Russian Language: Syntax—The Non-Embedded Clause]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
. 1979. Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka: sintaksis—složnoe predloženie [Historical Grammar of the Russian Language: Syntax—The Embedded Clause]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Borkovskij, V.I. & P.S. Kuznecov. 1965. Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka [Historical Grammar of the Russian Language]. Moscow: AN SSSR.Google Scholar
Černyx, P. Ja. 1952. Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka [Historical Grammar of the Russian Language]. Moscow: Učpedgiz.Google Scholar
Dewey, Tonya Kim & Yasmin Syed. 2009. Case Variation in Gothic Absolute Constructions. The Role of Semantic, Pragmatic, and Discourse Factors in the Development of Case ed. by Jóhanna Barðdal & Shobhana L. Chelliah, 3–21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Disterheft, Dorothy. 1980. The Syntactic Development of the Infinitive in Indo-European. Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar
. 1997. The Evolution of Indo-European Infinitives. Ancient Languages and Philology: Studies in Honor of Jaan Puhvel, Vol. 11 ed. by Dorothy Disterheft, Martin Hud & John Greppin, 101–122. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Etxepare, Ricardo & Kleanthes Grohmann. 2003. Root Infinitives: A Comparative Overview. Probus 151.201–36.Google Scholar
Fodor, Janet D. 1998. Unambiguous Triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 29:1.1–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortuin, Egbert. 2005. From Possibility to Necessity: The Semantic Spectrum of the Dative-Infinitive Construction in Russian. Modality in Slavonic Languages: New Perspectives ed. by Björn Hansen & Petr Karlík, 39–60. Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Franks, Steven. 1995. Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara. 2007. Subjects, Topics and the Interpretation of Referential Pro. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25:4.691–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haderka, Karel. 1964. Sočetanija sub’’jekta, svjazannogo s infinitivom, v staroslavjanskix i cerkovnoslavjanskix pamjatnikax [The construction “subject + infinitive” in the Old and Church Slavonic texts]. Slavia 331.505–533.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. Word Lexicon and Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders, Aarti Nayudu & Michelle Sheehan. 2009. Three Partial Null-Subject Languages: A Comparison of Brazilian Portuguese, Finnish and Marathi. Studia Linguistica 63:1.59–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert & Itziar San Martin. 2001. Obviation as Anti-Control. International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology (ASJU)35:1.367–384.Google Scholar
Jung, Hakyung. 2014. The Syntax of the Be-Auxiliary and D-Feature Lowering in Old North Russian. A talk presented at Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics . University of California, Berkeley, CA, May 2014.
Kedajtene, Je. I. 1968. Datel’nyj samostojatel’nyj [Absolute dative constructions]. Sravnitel´no-istoričeskij sintaksis vostočnoslavjanskich jazykov. Členy predloženija ed. by V.I. Borkosvskij. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Keydana, Götz. 2013. Infinitive im R̥gveda: Formen, Funktion, Diachronie. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kibrik, A.A. 2013. Peculiarities and Origins of the Russian Referential System. Languages across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska ed. by Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath, 227–262. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotin, Michail L. 2012 Impersonal Dative Constructions as Covert Root-Modality Patterns. Covert Patterns of Modality ed. by Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss, 153–174. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of Grammar in Patterns of Language Change. Language Variation and Change 1:3.199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1964 The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Lamprecht, Arnošt, Dušan Šlosar & Jaroslav Bauer. 1986. Historická mluvnice češtiny [Historical Grammar of the Czech Language]. Prague: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2004. The Scale of Finiteness and the Calculus of Control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22:4.811–877. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1999. The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2006. How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindseth, Martina. 1998. Null-Subject Properties of Slavic Languages: With Special Reference to Russian, Czech and Sorbian. Munich: Otto Sagner. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lomtev, T.P. 1956. Očerki po istoričeskomu sintaksisu russkogo jazyka [Introduction to the Historical Syntax of the Russian Language]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. Forthcoming. The Dative of Agent in Indo-European Languages. STUF—Language Typology and Universals, Special Issue on Non-Central Usages of Datives.
Madariaga, Nerea. 2006. Why Semi-Predicative Items Always Agree. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 14:1.45–78.Google Scholar
. 2008. Grammar Change and the Development of New Case Relations: The Interaction between Core Syntax and the Linguistic Periphery in Old and Present-Day Russian. University of the Basque Country PhD thesis.Google Scholar
. 2011. Infinitive Clauses and Dative Subjects in Russian. Russian Linguistics 35:3.301–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Diachronic Change and the Nature of Pronominal Null Subjects: The Case of Russian. Submitted manuscript. University of the Basque Country.
McShane, Marjorie J. 2005. A Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1934. Le slave commun. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Meyer, Roland. 2009. Zur Geschichte des referentiallen Nullsubjekts im Russischen. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 541.375–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The History of Null Subjects in East Slavonic: A Corpus Based Diachronic Investigation. University of Regensburg Habilitation thesis.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1981. Predicate Nominals: A Partial Surface Syntax of Russian. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pacnerová, Ludmila. 1964. Sintaksis infinitiva v staroslavjanskix jevangel’skix kodeksax s tochki zrenija texniki perevoda [The syntax of the infinitive in the Old Slavonic texts from the viewpoint of their translation]. Slavia 33:4.534–557.Google Scholar
Potebnja, A.A. 1958 [1874]. Iz zapisok po russkoj grammatike [Outline of a Russian Grammar]. Moscow: Učpedgiz.Google Scholar
Raposo, Eduardo. 1987. Case Theory and Infl-to-Comp: The Inflected Infinitive in European Portuguese. Linguistic Inquiry 18:1.85–109.Google Scholar
Reuland, Eric. 1983. Governing -ing . Linguistic Inquiry 14:1.101–136.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anders Holmberg. 2010. Introduction: Parameters in Minimalist Theory. Null Subjects: The Structure of Parametric Variation ed. by Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan, 1–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruppel, Antonia. 2012. Absolute Constructions in Early Indo-European. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmalstieg, William R. 1980. Indo-European Linguistics: A New Synthesis. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Seliščev, A.M. 2001 [1951]. Staroslavjanskij jazyk [Old Church Slavonic]. Moscow: URSS.Google Scholar
Ševcova, A.A. 1964. Infinitivnyje predloženija v pamjatnikax vostočnoslavjanskoj pis’mennosti (konec XIV–XVI vv.) [Infinitive clauses in the East Slavic texts (end of the 14–16th centuries)]. Avtoreferat dissertacii kandidata filologičeskix nauk, Moskcow: MGU.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald J.L. 1996. Introduction to Indo-European Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Timberlake, Alan. 1977. Reanalysis and Actualization in Syntactic Change. Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, ed. by Charles Li, 141–177. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Timofeev, K.A. 1965. K voprosu o proisxoždenii infinitivnyx predloženijax v russkom jazyke [On the origin of infinitive clauses in Russian]. Filologičeskie nauki 21.105–113.Google Scholar
Tsedryk, Egor. 2012. Finite Control in Russian as Movement: Subject Extraction, Feature Deficiency and Parametric Variation. Saint Mary’s University manuscript.
. 2013. Internal Merge of Nominative Subjects and Pro-Drop in Russian. Proceedings of the 2013 CLA Conference , ed. by Shan Luo. Available at [URL].
Vaillant, André. 2002 [1948]. Rukovodstvo po staroslovjanskomu jazyku [Manuel du vieux slave]. Moskva: URSS.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn. 2014. Main Clause Infinitival Predicates and Their Equivalents in Slavic. Manuscript submitted to the volume Infinitives at the Syntax–Semantics Interface: A Diachronic Perspective ed. by Lukasz Jedrzejowski & Ulrike Demske. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Luraghi, Silvia
2016. The dative of agent in Indo-European languages. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 69:1 ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.