Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 6:2 (2016) ► pp.165–200

Tracking semantic change in fl- monomorphemes in the Oxford English Dictionary

| CRISCO EA 4255 Université de Caen |

This study aims to track diachronic semantic shift in a small set of monomorphemes collected from the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), carrying the initial fl- phonestheme, such as flounder, flummox, flail, etc. The purpose is to determine the semantic behavior of fl- monomorphemes by identifying OED key words, which are then classified into eleven conceptual categories of semantic features. Five features of the eleven are conjectured as major on the basis of frequency of occurrence and frequency of combination with other features. Features which share similar progression rates are hypothesized to be linked through the natural process of metonymy (MTA, SV, SBT). Early emergent features are viewed as primary (MTA and MTL). From there, directionality of shift is assessed by comparing co-emergent with post-attestation features. Although no general pattern is discernible on this scale, several case studies of unexpected semantic shift towards minor features as in flummer and flourish show promising results for the field of historical lexical semantics.

Keywords: phonesthemes, semantic change, directionality of change, feature analysis, Sketch Engine, corpus linguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data, source, and method
    • 2.1Selection of initial submorpheme fl-
    • 2.2Using lexicographic data
      • 2.2.1Using the Oxford English Dictionary to track semantic shift over time
      • 2.2.2Collecting data from the OED online
      • 2.2.3Diachronic inclusions and dates
      • 2.2.4Sample corpus
    • 2.3Method for identifying shared semantic content
      • 2.3.1The shared semantic content of fl-
      • 2.3.2Identifying recurring features in OED definitions: Feature analysis
      • 2.3.3Correlation between shared roots and semantic features
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Distribution of features
    • 3.2Feature combination and its relevance
    • 3.3Diachronic propagation of fl- features over time
    • 3.4Semantic shift in frequent features (MTA, SV, SBT, MTL): Co-emergence vs. post-attestation emergence
    • 3.5Minor features emergence
    • 3.6Preliminary conclusions: Natural semantic shift between fl- features
  • 4.Discussion: Interpretation of results
    • 4.1Natural processes and analogy in language change
      • 4.1.1Natural processes of language change
      • 4.1.2Evidence of phonesthetic shift and what it means for language change
    • 4.2The evidence of semantic shift in fl- words in OED
    • 4.3Extrapolating semantic change in post-1900 fl- words
    • 4.4Collocate behavioral test of some fl- monomorphemes in the OEC
    • 4.5Testing collocate analysis of flounce <1542> in the OEC
  • 5.Summary
  • 6.Wider implications: Tools and multivariate statistics for semantic study
  • Notes
  • Primary Sources
  • References
Published online: 2 March 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.6.2.02smi
References

Primary Sources

The Oxford English Dictionary (OED)
Online subscription version, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at [URL]. Last accessed 16/03/2015.
Oxford English Corpus (OEC)
Access granted by Oxford University, provided by Sketch Engine v3 (Feb 2012) “OEC + Biwec build v2″ 2.073 G words.
Google Books American
Available at [URL].
Corpus of Global Web-Based English
Available at [URL].
SketchEngine
Available at [URL].
Semantic Atlas: The Semantic Atlas Institut des Sciences Cognitives
CNRS, University Lyon 11, UMR 5015.
HTOED: The Historical Thesaurus of English
2009 Glasgow University, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Abramova, Ekaterina, Raquel Fernandes & Frederico Sangati
2013 Automatic Labeling of Phonesthemic Senses. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Cognitive Science Meeting 2013 . Available online at [URL].
Aitchison, Jean
2012 [1989] Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon, 4th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Allan, Kathryn
2012 Using OED Data as Evidence. In Kathryn Allan & Justyna Robinson, eds., 17–40.Google Scholar
Allan, Kathryn & Justyna Robinson
eds. 2012 Current Methods in Historical Semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Argoud, Line
2008 Les ‘mots en bl-’ du lexique anglais: étude de la structuration des données dans une optique lexico-cognitive. Lexis 2: Lexical Submorphemics ed. by Jamet Denis, 43–76.Google Scholar
2011 Réalité des idéophones anglais (phonesthèmes): propositions dans le cadre d’une approche de linguistique cognitive. E-rea, Revue d’études sur le monde anglophone. [Online Journal of English Studies]. Available online at [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2008 Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin K
2004 The Psychological Reality of Phonaesthemes. Language 80:2.291–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Phonesthemes: Frequency and Psychological Reality. Paper presented at the Emory University Conference Workshop Sound Symbolism: Challenging the Arbitrariness of Language , 26–27 March, 2010. Available online at [URL].
Bolinger, Dwight L
1940 Word Affinities. American Speech 151.62–73. Reprinted in Bolinger 1965, 191–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1965 Forms of English: Accent, Morpheme, Order ed. by Isamu Abe & Tetsuya Kanekiyo. Cambridge: Harvard University Press/Tokyo: Hokuou.Google Scholar
Bottineau, Didier
2008 The Submorphemic Conjecture in English: Towards a Distributed Model of the Cognitive Dynamics of Submorphemes. Lexis 21.19–42.Google Scholar
Boussidan, Armelle, Eyal Sagi & Sabine Ploux
2009 Phonaesthemic and Etymological Effects on the Distribution of Senses in Statistical Models of Semantics. Proceedings of the 34th Cognitive Science Annual Meeting 20091, 36–40.
Croft, William
2000 Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow: Longman/Pearson.Google Scholar
Croft, William & Richard A Blythe
2012 S-curves and the Mechanisms of Propagation in Language Change. Language 88:2.269–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David
2003 A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 5th ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Denison, David
2002 Log(ist)ic and Simplistic S-curves. Motives for Language Change ed. by Raymond Hickey, 54–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dirven, Rene
2005 Major Strands in Cognitive Linguistics. In Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, ed., 17–68.Google Scholar
Drellishak, Scott
2006 Statistical Techniques for Detecting and Validating Phonesthemes. Paper presented at the 81st Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America , Anaheim, CA.
Firth, John R
1930 Speech. London: Ernest Benn.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga
2009 Grammaticalisation as Analogy Driven Change. Vienna English Working Articles 18:2.3–23. Available online at [URL].Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr
2005 Embodied Action in Thought and Language. In Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, ed., 225–248.Google Scholar
Glynn, Dylan
2010 Corpus-Driven Cognitive Semantics: An Introduction to the Field. Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-driven approaches ed. by D. Glynn & K. Fischer. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012a Correspondence Analysis: An Exploratory Technique for Identifying Usage Patterns. In Dylan Glynn & Justyna A. Robinson, eds.Google Scholar
2012b Techniques and Tools: Corpus Methods and Statistics for Semantics. In Dylan Glynn & Justyna A. Robinson, eds.Google Scholar
2012c The Many Uses of Run: Corpus Methods and Socio-Cogntive Semantics. In Dylan Glynn & Robinson, eds.Google Scholar
Glynn, Dylan & J. Robinson
eds. 2012 Corpus Methods in Cognitive Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan & Anatol Stefanowitsch
2010 Cluster Analysis and the Identification of Collexeme Classes. Empirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive/Functional Research ed. by Sally Rice & John Newman. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Heinrich & Brian D. Joseph
2009 [1996] Language History, Language Change and Language Relationship: An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Berli: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunter-Smith, Sarah
2007 Understanding without Babblefish: Reviewing the Evidence for Universal Sound Symbolism in Natural Languages. Swarthmore College Unpublished Thesis. Available online at [URL].Google Scholar
Hutchins, S. S
1998 The Psychological Reality, Variability, and Compositionality of English Phonesthemes. Emory University PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1922 Language—Its nature, Development and Origin. London: George Allen & Unwim Ltd.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D
1997 On the Linguistics of Marginality: The Centrality of the Periphery. Articles from the 33rd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society ed. by Kora Singer, Randall Eggert & Gregory Anderson, 197–213. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Pavel Rychlý, Pavel Smrž & David Tugwell
2004 The Sketch Engine. Proceedings of Euralex, 105–116. Lorient, France: Universite de Bretagne-Sud.Google Scholar
Koch, Peter
2012 The Pervasiveness of Contiguity and Metonymy in Semantic Change. In Kathryn Allan & Justyna Robinson, eds., 259–312.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
2003 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Anatoly
1990 Etymological Studies 3. Some Germanic Words Beginning with fl-: Language at Play. General Linguistics 301.81–107.Google Scholar
2013 Flutes and Flatterers. OUP blog June 2013 Available online at [URL].Google Scholar
Lijffijt, Jefrey, Tanja Säily & Terttu Nevalainen
2012 CEECing the Caseline: Lexical Stability and Significant Change in a Historical Corpus. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English, Volume 10. Outposts of Historical Corpus Linguistics: From the Helsinki Corpus to a Proliferation of Resources ed. by Jukka Tyrkkö, Matti Kilpiö, Terttu Nevalainen & Matti Rissanen, Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English (VARIENG), University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Lijffijt, Jefrey, Terttu Nevalainen, Tanja Säily, Panagiotis Papapetrou, Kai Puolamäki & Heikki Mannila
2015 Significance Testing of Word Frequencies in Corpora. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. Available online at [URL].Google Scholar
Marchand, Hans
1969 The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation. München: Verlag C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Miller, D. Gary
2010 Language Change and Linguistic Theory. 2 Vols1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014 Lexicogenesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
2014 The Predictive Potential of Empirical Historical Research and the S-Curve Model of Change. Paper Presented at Conference The International Society for the Linguistics of English (ISLE) , 24–27 August 2014, Zurich.
Ohala, John J
1994 The Frequency Code Underlies the Sound-Symbolic Use of Voice Pitch. Sound Symbolism ed. by Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala, 325–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Otis, Katya & Eyal Sagi
2008 Phonaesthemes: A Corpora-Based Analysis. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. by Bradley C. Love, Ken McRae & Vladmir M. Sloutsky, 65–70. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Philps, Dennis
2002 Le concept de ‘marqueur sub-lexical’ et la notion d’invariant sémantique. La notion d’invariant sémantique ed. by P. Larrivée. Travaux de linguistique 451.103–123.Google Scholar
2008a Submorphemic Iconicity in the Lexicon; A Diachronic Approach to English gn- Words. Lexis 2: La submorphémique lexicale. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008b Sons et lumières: le marqueur sublexical <gl-> . L’Envers du décor, Etudes de linguistique anglaise ed. by Geneviève Girard, 24–43. Avignon: Publication des presses de l’Université d’Avignon.Google Scholar
2008c From Mouth to Eye. The Evolution of Language ed. by A. Smith, K. Smith & R. Ferreri, 251–258. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Conceptual Transfer and the Emergence of the Sign. CogniTextes 21. Available online at [URL].Google Scholar
2011 Reconsidering Phonaesthemes: Submorphemic Invariance in English sn- Words. Lingua 1211.1121–1137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Submorphemes: Backtracking from English ‘kn- words’ to the Emergence of the Linguistic Sign. Miranda 71. Available online at [URL]. DOI logo
Reay, I. E
2009 [1994] Sound Symbolism. Concise Encyclopedia of Semantics ed. by Keith Allan, 893–901. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
ed. 2005 Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rychlý, Pavel
2008 A Lexicographer-Friendly Association Score. Proceedings of 2nd Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Languages Processing, RASLAN 2008 ed. by Petr Sojka & Aleš Horák, 6–9. Brno: Masaryk University. Available online at [URL].Google Scholar
Sagi, Eyal, Stefan Kaufmann & Brady Clark
2012 Tracing Semantic Change with Latent Semantic Analysis. In Allan Kathryn & Justyna Robinson, eds., 161–183.Google Scholar
Shisler, Benjamin K
1997 Dictionary of English Phonesthemes. Available online at [URL].Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.M
1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Chris A
2015 The Phonesthetics of Blends: A Diachronic Study of Cognitive Blends in the OED. ExELL Vol. 2.11 ed. by Adisa Imamović. Available online at [URL].Google Scholar
Tournier, Jean
2007 [1985] Introduction descriptive à la lexicogénétique de l’anglais contemporain. Paris: Champion-Slatkine.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth
2010 Revisiting Subjectification and Intersubjectification. Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization ed. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens, 29–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsur, Reuven
2006 Size Sound Symbolism Revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 381.905–924. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waugh, Linda R
1979 On the Sound Shape of Language. The Sound Shape of Language ed. by Roman Jakobson & Linda R. Waugh, 198–214. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
1994 Degrees of Iconicity. Journal of Pragmatics 221.55–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Joseph
1898–1905 The English Dialect Dictionary Vol. II D-G1 ed. by Joseph Wright. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Benczes, Réka
2020. Sound Symbolism and Semantic Change. In Dynamics of Language Changes, ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Haslett, David A. & Zhenguang G. Cai
2023. Systematic mappings of sound to meaning: A theoretical review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review DOI logo
Mahler, Hanna
2019. Lexical Emergence on Reddit: An Analysis of Lexical Change on the “Front Page of the Internet”. Lexis :16 DOI logo
PENTANGELO, JOSEPH
2021. Phonesthetics and the etymologies ofbloodandbone. English Language and Linguistics 25:2 ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Smith, Chris A.
2019. A Case Study of -some and -able Derivatives in the. Lexis :16 DOI logo
Smith, Chris A.
2019. Introduction. Lexis :16 DOI logo
Smith, Chris A.
2019. List of References. Lexis :16 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.