Cover not available
Article published In:
The Rise and Development of Evidential and Epistemic Markers
Edited by Silvio Cruschina and Eva-Maria Remberger
[Journal of Historical Linguistics 7:1/2] 2017
► pp. 111–133

From visual perception to inference in the French evidential markers il m’est avis que, apparemment, and il paraît que

| Universidad Complutense de Madrid

This article studies the evolution, from Medieval to Modern French, of three evidential markers that are semantically related from a diachronic perspective: il m’est avis que ‘I think that’, ‘it seems to me that’, apparemment ‘apparently’, and il paraît que ‘it seems that, apparently’. This study demonstrates the rise of the modal and evidential uses of the markers in question, from the Medieval period onwards, and provides a semantic characterization of these three epistemic-evidential markers in order to precisely grasp the evolution of their meaning. Using information from a number of databases, this article provides empirical support for the study of the different types of evidentiality, their evolution, and their interaction with the epistemic commitment of the speaker and the degree of certainty. The three markers have evolved towards greater subjectivity and a lower degree of certainty. Their historical semantic description shows that a marker may shift diachronically between various types of evidence.

Keywords: evidentiality, French, historical pragmatics, visual perception, inference, epistemic modality
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The evolution of il m’est avis que
  • 3.The origins of the evidential inferential marker apparemment
  • 4.The evolution of il paraît que
  • 5.The parentheticals à ce qu’il paraît, il paraît, comme il paraît, and paraît- il
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Databases and dictionaries
  • Primary sources
  • References
Published online: 23 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.7.1-2.05rod
References

Databases and dictionaries

Corpus de la littérature médiévale en langue d’oïl des origines à la fin du XVe siècle
, Paris, Champion électronique 2001.Google Scholar
Textes de français ancien (TFA)
Laboratoire de Français Ancien, The ARTLF Project. University of Ottawa.
Frantext
ATILF – CNRS/Université de Nancy 2. Available online at [URL].

Primary sources

Alexandre de Paris
1937 The Medieval French Roman d’Alexandre ed. by Edward C. Armstrong & Douglas L. Buffum, Vol. 21. Princeton: Elliott Monographs.Google Scholar
Becque, Henri
1922 Les Corbeaux, in Théâtre complet, Vol. 21. Paris: Fasquelle.Google Scholar
Calvin, Jean
1957 Institution de la religion chrestienne ed. by J. D. Benoit. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Capitaine Gervais
2009 Souvenirs d’un soldat de l’empire. A la conquête de l’Europe. Paris: Bernard Giovanangeli.Google Scholar
Comte de Volney
1787 Voyage en Égypte et en Syrie. Paris: Volland.Google Scholar
Corrozet, Gilles
1992 Second livre des fables d’Esope ed. by Paola Cifarelli. Geneva: Slatkine Reprints.Google Scholar
Daudet, Alphonse
1890 La Lutte pour la vie. Paris: Librairie de France.Google Scholar
Dufresny, Charles
1857 La Coquette de village ou le Lot supposé. Paris: Firmin Didot.Google Scholar
Esprit, Jacques
1710 La Fausseté des vertus humaines. Amsterdam: P. Mortier.Google Scholar
Faulkner, William
1935 Lumière d’août translated by Maurice-Edgar Coindreau. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Froissart, Jean
1972 Chroniques ed. by George T. Diller. Paris: Droz-Minard.Google Scholar
Juvénal des Ursins, Jean
1978 Ecrits politiques. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Lavardin, Jacques de
1974 La Célestine ed. by Denis L. Drysdale. London: Tamesis Books.Google Scholar
Lesage, Alain-René
1821 Aventures du chevalier de Beauchêne. Paris: Renouard.Google Scholar
Marivaux
1968 Le Prince travesti, ou l’Illustre aventurier, in Théâtre complet ed. by Frédéric Deloffre, Vol. 11. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
Mme de Sévigné
1974 Correspondance, Vol. 21. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Montesquieu
1914 Correspondance 1716–1755 ed. by François Gebelin & André Morize. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Musset, Alfred de
1923 La Coupe et les lèvres, in Oeuvres complètes ed. by Fernand Baldensperger & Robert Doré, Vol. 11. Paris: Conard.Google Scholar
Paris, Gaston & Ulysse Robert
eds. 1876–1897 Miracles de Nostre Dame par personnages, 71 vols. Paris: Firmin Didot.Google Scholar
Ponson du Terrail, Pierre-Alexis
1963 Rocambole. Les drames de Paris ed. by C. A. Ciccione, Vol. 11. Monaco: Eds du Rocher.Google Scholar
Renaud de Beaujeu
2003 Le bel inconnu ed. by Michèle Perret & Isabelle Weill. Paris: Champion classiques.Google Scholar
Roques, M.
ed. 1952 Erec et Enide. Paris: Champion CFMA.Google Scholar
Sand, George
1981 François le Champi. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
1987 Correspondance 1830 ed. by Georges Lubin. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
Scarron, Paul
1995 Le Gardien de soy-mesme. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Scribe, Eugène
1845 Le Mariage de raison, in Oeuvres complètes Vol. 41. Paris: Furne.Google Scholar
Sergent Bourgogne
1995 Mémoires. Paris: Arléa.Google Scholar
Toussaint, Jean-Philippe
1985 La salle de bain. Paris: Eds de Minuit.Google Scholar
Tyard, Pontus de
1990 Mantice: discours de la vérité de Divination par Astrologie ed. by Sylviane Bokdam. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Voyage de La Pérouse autour du monde
1797 Paris: Impr. de la République.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1986 Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology ed. by Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols, 261–272. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert
2007 The Continuum Between Lexical and Grammatical Evidentiality: A functional analysis of Spanish parecer . Rivista di Linguistica 19:1.109–128.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert & Paola Pietrandrea
2012 Modality at Work: Cognitive, interactional and textual functions of modal markers. Journal of Pragmatics 441.2109–2115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dendale, Patrick
1994  Devoir épistémique, marqueur modal ou évidentiel?. Langue Française 1021.24–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dendale, Patrick & Liliana Tasmowski
2001 Introduction: Evidentiality and related notions. Journal of Pragmatics 33:3.339–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dendale, Patrick & Julie van Bogaert
2007 A Semantic Description of French Lexical Evidential Markers and the Classification of Evidentials. Rivista di Linguistica 19:1.65–89.Google Scholar
González Ramos, Elisa
2005  Por lo visto y al parecer: Comparación de dos locuciones modales epistémicos de evidencialidad en español actual. Interlingüística 161.541–554.Google Scholar
Grossman, Francis & Agnès Tutin
2010 Evidential Markers in French Scientific Writing: The case of the French verb voir . Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages ed. by Elena Smirnova & Gabriele Diewald, 279–308. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hanson, Kristin
1987 On Subjectivity and the History of Epistemic Expressions in English. Chicago Linguistic Society 23:1.133–147.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002 On the Role of Context in Grammaticalization. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nølke, Henning
2001 La dilution linguistique des responsabilités. Essai de description polyphonique des marqueurs évidentiels il semble que et il paraît que . Le regard du locuteur 21, 15–34. Paris: Kimé.Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
2001 Subjectivity as an Evidential Dimension in Epistemic Modal Expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 33:3.383–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Notions of (Inter)subjectivity. English Text Construction 51.53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pietrandrea, Paola
2007 The Grammatical Nature of Some Epistemic-Evidential Adverbs in Spoken Italian. Rivista di Linguistica 19:1.39–64.Google Scholar
Rey, Alain
2004 [1992] Dictionnaire historique de la langue française. Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Somolinos, Amalia
2010 L’évolution de apparemment en français: la formation d’un marqueur d’attitude énonciative. Le changement en français. Etudes de linguistique diachronique ed. by Bernard Combettes Céline Guillot, Alexei Lavrentiev, Evelyne Oppermann-Marsaux, & Sophie Prévost, 345–361. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2014 L’évolution en français de il m’est avis que/ ce m’est avis: médiativité, perception, inférence. Actes du Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française 2014, 1–12. Institut de Linguistique Française/EDP Sciences, CD-ROM.Google Scholar
2016 Perception visuelle, inférence et polyphonie: l’évolution de il paraît que . Linx 73:2.17–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Squartini, Mario
2004 Disentangling Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in Romance. Lingua 1141.873–895. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1991 From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1989 On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 571.33–65.Google Scholar
Willems, Dominique. & Claire Blanche-Benveniste
2010 Verbes ‛faibles’ et verbes à valeur épistémique en français parlé: il me semble, il paraît, j’ai l’impression, on dirait, je dirais. Actes du XXVe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romane Vol. IV1 ed. by Maria Iliescu, Heidi Siller-Runggaldier, & Paul Danler, 565–576. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar