Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 19:1 (2018) ► pp.122–149

Evidentiality and propositional scope in Early Modern German

| University of Nottingham, UK
This paper provides an overview of verbal markers of evidentiality in Early Modern German (1650 to 1800) in light of Boye’s propositional scope hypothesis. The markers under investigation include the semi-auxiliary scheinen (‘to shine, appear, seem’) and the perception verbs sehen (‘see’) and hören (‘hear’). I show that, although Boye’s hypothesis sheds new light on and calls into question previous diachronic accounts of scheinen, it appears not to account fully for why cases where perception verbs do not scope over propositions are also found with evidential readings in light of the larger discourse context. I will show that Boye’s hypothesis is still feasible when such contexts are taken into account. Data are drawn from the German Manchester Corpus (GerManC), a representative multi-register corpus of Early Modern German from 1650 to 1800.
Keywords: Early Modern German, evidentiality, propositional scope
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Evidentiality in German
  • 3.The data: The GerManC corpus
  • 4.Results and analysis
    • 4.1Inferential evidentiality and grammaticalization: The case of scheinen
      • 4.1.1Copulas and the zu-infinitive construction
      • 4.1.2Complement clauses and parentheticals
      • 4.1.3Summary of scheinen
    • 4.2Lexical evidentials: The perception verbs sehen and hören
      • 4.2.1Complement clauses and parentheticals
      • 4.2.2Direct object + infinitive constructions
      • 4.2.3External constructions
      • 4.2.4Summary of sehen and hören
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00013.whi
References (45)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. “Evidentiality in Typological Perspective”. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Robert M. W. Dixon (eds), Studies in Evidentiality, 1–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. “Evidentials, Paths of Change and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries”. In Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols (eds), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, 273–312. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
d’Avis, Franz Josef. 2005. “Über Parenthesen” [‘On Parentheticals’]. In Franz Josef d’Avis (ed.), Deutsche Syntax: Empirie und Theorie [‘German Syntax: Empiricism and Theory’], 259–79. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper. 2010a. “Evidence for What? Evidentiality and Scope”. Language Typology and Universals 63 (4): 290–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010b. “Reference and Clausal Perception-Verb Complements”. Linguistics 48 (2): 391–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functional-Cognitive Study. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper and Peter Harder. 2009. “Evidentiality: Linguistic Categories and Grammaticalization”. Functions of Language 16 (1): 9–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 2008. The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1986. “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing”. In Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols (eds), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, 261–72. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2001. “ Scheinen-Probleme: Analogie, Konstruktionsmischung und die Sogwirkung aktiver Grammatikalisierungskanäle” [‘Problems with Scheinen: Analogy, Construction Blending and the Knock-On Effects of Active Grammaticalization Channels’]. In Reimar Müller and Marga Reis (eds), Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen [‘Modality and Modal Verbs in German’], 87–110. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele and Elena Smirnova. 2010. Evidentiality in German: Linguistic Realization and Regularities in Grammaticalization. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durrell, Martin. 2011. Hammer’s German Grammar and Usage. (Fifth edition.) London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Durrell, Martin, Paul Bennett, Silke Scheible, Richard J. Whitt and Astrid Ensslin. 2012. The GerManC Corpus: A Representative Corpus of Early Modern German from 1650 to 1800. Oxford: The Oxford Text Archive. Accessed 30 October 2017 at: [URL].
Eisenberg, Peter. 1999. Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik [‘An Outline of German Grammar’]. Vol. 21 (Der Satz). Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan. 2008. “Vom Mittelneuhochdeutsch (bis ca. 1950) zum Gegenwartsdeutsch” [‘From Middle New High German (until ca. 1950) to Contemporary German’]. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik [‘Journal of Dialectology and Linguistics’] 75 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Falkenberg, Gabriel. 1989. “Einige Bemerkungen zu perzeptiven Verben” [‘Some Remarks on Perception Verbs’]. In Gabriel Falkenberg (ed.), Wissen, Wahrnehmen, Glauben: Epistemische Ausdrücke und propositionale Einstellungen [‘Knowledge, Perception, Belief: Epistemic Expressions and Propositional Attitudes’], 27–46. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas and Jasper Holmes. 2007. “A History of English Evidential Verbs of Appearance”. English Language and Linguistics 11 (1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Haan, Ferdinand. 2007. “Raising as Grammaticalization: The Case of Germanic seem-Verbs”. Rivista di Linguistica 19 (1), 129–50.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 2005. “Parenthesen – Evidenz aus Bindungsverhältnissen”. In Franz Josef d’Avis (ed.), Deutsche Syntax: Empirie und Theorie [‘German Syntax: Empiricism and Theory’], 281–93. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Harm, Volker. 2000. Regularitäten des semantischen Wandels bei Wahrnehmungsverben des Deutschen [‘Regularities of Semantic Change with Perception Verbs in German’]. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees and J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 2003. “Evidentials: Summation, Questions, Prospects”. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Robert M. W. Dixon (eds), Studies in Evidentiality, 307–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, Peter and Wulf Oesterreicher. 1985. “Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte” [‘The Language of Nearness – the Language of Distance: Speech and Writing as a Locus of Dispute between Language Theory and Language History’]. Romanistiches Jahrbuch [‘Romance Yearbook’] 361: 15–43.Google Scholar
Kotin, Michail L. 2011. “ Ik gihôrta đat seggen … Modalität, Evidentialität, Sprachwandel und das Problem der grammatischen Kategorisierung” [‘…Modality, Evidentiality, Language Change and the Problem of Grammatical Categorization’]. In Gabriele Diewald and Elena Smirnova (ed.), Modalität und Evidentialität [‘Modality and Evidentiality’], 35–48. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert. 2001. “On the Grammaticalization of Evidentiality”. Journal of Pragmatics 33 (3): 359–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth. 2011. “Lexikalische versus grammatische Epistemizität und Evidentialität: Plädoyer für eine klare Trennung von Lexikon und Grammatik” [‘Lexical versus Grammatical Epistemicity and Evidentiality: A Plea for a Clear Distinction between Lexicon and Grammar’]. In Gabriele Diewald and Elena Smirnova (eds), Modalität und Evidentialität [‘Modality and Evidentiality’], 149–69. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
López-Couso, María and Belén Méndez-Naya. 2014. “On the Origin of Clausal Parenthetical Constructions: Epistemic/Evidential Parentheticals with seem and Impersonal think ”. In Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker and Jukka Tuominen (eds), Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics, 189–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matlock, Teenie. 1989. “Metaphor and the Grammaticalization of Evidentials”. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 151: 215–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 2001. Mood and Modality. (Second edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2001. “The Place of Evidentiality within the Universal Grammatical Space”. Journal of Pragmatics 33 (3): 349–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Polenz, Peter. 2013. Deutsche Sprachgeschichte vom Spätmittelalter bis zur Gegenwart [‘History of German from the Lade Middle Ages to the Present’], Vol. II1 (17. und 18. Jahrhundert) [‘(17th and 18th centuries)’]. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Roelcke, Thorsten. 1998. “Die Periodisierung der deutschen Sprachgeschichte” [‘The Periodization of German Language History’]. In Werner Besch, Anne Betten, Oskar Reichmann and Stefan Sonderegger (eds), Sprachgeschichte: Ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung [‘Language History: A Handbook on Research into the History of the German Language’], 798–815. Volume II1. (Second edition.) Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Scheible, Silke, Richard J. Whitt, Martin Durrell and Paul Bennett. 2012. “GATE to GerManC: A GATE-based annotation pipeline for historical German”. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012), 3611–17. Istanbul, Turkey. Available online at: [URL].
Scott, Mike. 2012. WordSmith Tools Version 6. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. and Anthony Mulac. 1991. “A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English”. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization, 313–29. (Volume 21.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Timofeeva, Olga. 2013. “ Hearsay and Lexical Evidentials in Old Germanic Languages, with Focus on Old English”. In Gabriele Diewald, Leena Kahlas-Tarkka and Ilse Wischer (eds), Comparative Studies in Early Germanic Languages: With a Focus on Verbal Categories, 169–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viberg, Åke. 1983. “The Verbs of Perception: A Typological Study”. Linguistics 211: 123–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitt, Richard J. 2009. “Auditory Evidentiality in English and German”. Lingua 119 (7): 1083–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Evidentiality and Perception Verbs in English and German. Oxford and Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. “(Inter)Subjectivity and Evidential Perception Verbs in English and German”. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (1): 347–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. “Singular Perception, Multiple Perspectives through we: Constructing Intersubjective Meaning in English and German”. In Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou (ed.), Constructive Collectivity: ‘We’ Across Languages and Contexts, 45–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willett, Thomas. 1988. “A Cross-Linguistic Survey of the Grammaticalization of Evidentiality”. Studies in Language 12 (1): 51–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Dobrynchuk, Olha O. & Tetiana V. Kalyniuk
2024. ASPEKTE DER HERAUSBILDUNG DES NEUHOCHDEUTSCHEN IM 18. JAHRHUNDERT (AM BEISPIEL DES STADTPLANS KAMJANEZ-PODILSKYJ (1726) VON GABRIEL BODENEHR). Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philology 1:27 ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
WHITT, RICHARD J.
2023. Epistemic space and key concepts in early and late modern medical discourse: an exploration of two genres. English Language and Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Poortvliet, Marjolein
2021. Early Alternatives to Dutch Descriptive Perception Verb Constructions: A Comparison of Two Bible Translations1. Transactions of the Philological Society 119:2 ► pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Lampert, Gunther
2020. Chapter 5. How and why seem became an evidential. In Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions [Studies in Language Companion Series, 216], ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Kempf, Luise
2018. Genre influence on word formation (change). In Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and Language Change [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 85], ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. The Sociopragmatics of Stance [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 329], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.