Article published in:
Dialogues in Diachrony: Celebrating Historical Corpora of Speech-related Texts
Edited by Merja Kytö and Terry Walker
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19:2] 2018
► pp. 223242


Now in the historical courtroom


Aijmer, Karin
2002English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1989Intonation and Its Uses. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel
2006 “Pathways in the Development of Pragmatic Markers in English”. In Ans van Kemenade and Bettelou Los (eds), The Handbook of the History of English, 307–334. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
CED = A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 2006 Compiled under the supervision of Merja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University).Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö
2010Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Defour, Tine
2008a “ And so now…: The Grammaticalisation and (Inter)subjectification of now ”. In Terttu Nevalainen, Irma Taavitsainen, Päivi Pahta and Minna Korhonen (eds), The Dynamics of Linguistic Variation: Corpus Evidence on English Past and Present, 17–36. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008b “The speaker’s Voice: A Diachronic Study on the Use of well and now as Pragmatic Markers”. English Text Construction 13: 62–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emsley, Clive, Tim Hitchcock and Robert Shoemaker
2003–2017 “Crime and Justice – Trial Procedures”, Old Bailey Proceedings Online (www​.oldbaileyonline​.org, version 7.2 07 July 2017).
Fraser, Bruce
1996 “Pragmatic Markers”. Pragmatics: Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association 6 (2): 167–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Sandra Beatriz
2004The Discourse of Court Interpreting: Discourse Practices of the Law, the Witness and the Interpreter. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth and Alison Johnson
2010 “Legal Talk: Socio-Pragmatic Aspects of Legal Talk: Police Interviews and Trial Discourse”. In Malcolm Coulthard and Alison Johnson (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, 21–36. London and New York: Taylor and Francis. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Innes, Bronwen
2010 “ ‘Well, That’s Why I Asked the Question Sir’: Well as a Discourse Marker in Court”. Language in Society 39 (1): 95–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janney, Richard W.
2007 “ ‘So your Story now is that…’: Metapragmatic Framing Strategies in Courtroom Interrogation”. In Wolfram Bublitz and Axel Hübler (eds), Metapragmatics in Use, 223–234. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara
1998 “Pragmatic Particles in Early Modern English Court Trials”. In Raimund Borgmeier, Herbert Grabes and Andreas H. Jucker (eds), Anglistentag 1997. Giessen. Proceedings, 47–56. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
[ p. 242 ]
Lutzky, Ursula
2012Discourse Markers in Early Modern English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
OBC Old Bailey Corpus 1720–1913, extended version, offline v2.1. 2012ff. Compiled by Magnus Huber, Magnus Nissel, Patrick Maiwald and Bianca Widlitzki.
OED = Oxford English Dictionary, third edition in progress 1989- Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online: http://​www​.oed​.com/; s.v. now adv., conj., n.1, and adj. (updated entry, Dec. 2003).
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence
2011 “The Discourse Marker now: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach”. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2110–2129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tkačuková, Tatiana
2015 “A Corpus-Assisted Study of the Discourse Marker well as an Indicator of Judges’ Institutional Roles in Court Cases with Litigants in Person”. Corpora: Corpus-Based Language Learning, Language Processing and Linguistics 10 (2): 145–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waring, Hansun Zhang
2012 “Doing Disaffiliation with now-Prefaced Utterances”. Language and Communication 3 (3): 265–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
WordSmith Tools (version 5.0)
2010PC software by Mike Scott. Lexical Analysis Software and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

2020. Entirely innocent: a historical sociopragmatic analysis of maximizers in the Old Bailey Corpus. English Language and Linguistics 24:4  pp. 855 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.