Article published In:
Dialogues in Diachrony: Celebrating Historical Corpora of Speech-related TextsEdited by Merja Kytö and Terry Walker
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19:2] 2018
► pp. 223–242
Edited by Merja Kytö and Terry Walker
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19:2] 2018
► pp. 223–242
Now in the historical courtroom
Users and functions
The investigation of the pragmatic marker now in trial proceedings from 1560 to 1800 shows a genre-specific usage profile with regard to its uses and functions. Courtroom “professionals” (lawyers, judges and other officials) use now significantly more frequently than lay speakers (witnesses, victims and defendants). The former use it to segment and highlight stages in the argumentation, as well as to control and to disalign with others’ interactive behaviour. Self-defending litigants share these functional preferences to some extent, while all other lay persons use now for structuring their answers and dominantly in direct-speech contexts. Now in professional legal speech thus functions as a strategic metapragmatic framing strategy.
Keywords: argumentation, conversational control, disalignment, framing, legal language, pragmatic marker
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The uses of now
- 3.Pragmatic markers in the courtroom
- 4.Data
- 5.Results
- 5.1Frequencies, functions and users of now
- 5.2Judges and lawyers
- 5.3Lay interactants
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
References
Aijmer, Karin
Bolinger, Dwight
1989 Intonation and Its Uses. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Brinton, Laurel
2006 “Pathways
in the Development of Pragmatic Markers in English”. In Ans van Kemenade and Bettelou Los (eds), The
Handbook of the History of
English, 307–334. Oxford: Blackwell. 
CED = A Corpus of English Dialogues
1560–1760 2006 Compiled under the supervision
of Merja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University).
Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö
2010 Early
Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as
Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Defour, Tine
2008a “
And
so now…: The Grammaticalisation and (Inter)subjectification of
now
”. In Terttu Nevalainen, Irma Taavitsainen, Päivi Pahta and Minna Korhonen (eds), The
Dynamics of Linguistic Variation: Corpus Evidence on English Past and
Present, 17–36. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
2008b “The
speaker’s Voice: A Diachronic Study on the Use of well and now as Pragmatic
Markers”. English Text
Construction 131: 62–82.
Emsley, Clive, Tim Hitchcock and Robert Shoemaker
2003–2017 “Crime
and Justice – Trial Procedures”, Old Bailey Proceedings Online ([URL], version
7.2 07 July 2017).
Fraser, Bruce
1996 “Pragmatic
Markers”. Pragmatics: Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics
Association 6 (2): 167–190.
Hale, Sandra Beatriz
2004 The Discourse of Court
Interpreting: Discourse Practices of the Law, the Witness and the
Interpreter. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Holt, Elizabeth and Alison Johnson
2010 “Legal
Talk: Socio-Pragmatic Aspects of Legal Talk: Police Interviews and Trial
Discourse”. In Malcolm Coulthard and Alison Johnson (eds), The
Routledge Handbook of Forensic
Linguistics, 21–36. London and New York: Taylor and Francis.
Innes, Bronwen
2010 “ ‘Well,
That’s Why I Asked the Question Sir’: Well as a Discourse Marker in
Court”. Language in
Society 39 (1): 95–117.
Janney, Richard W.
2007 “ ‘So your Story now is that…’:
Metapragmatic Framing Strategies in Courtroom
Interrogation”. In Wolfram Bublitz and Axel Hübler (eds), Metapragmatics
in
Use, 223–234. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara
1998 “Pragmatic
Particles in Early Modern English Court Trials”. In Raimund Borgmeier, Herbert Grabes and Andreas H. Jucker (eds), Anglistentag
1997. Giessen.
Proceedings, 47–56. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
Lutzky, Ursula
OBC Old Bailey Corpus
1720–1913, extended version, offline v2.1. 2012ff. Compiled
by Magnus Huber, Magnus Nissel, Patrick Maiwald and Bianca Widlitzki.
OED = Oxford English Dictionary, third
edition in
progress 1989- Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online: [URL]; s.v. now adv., conj., n.1, and
adj. (updated entry, Dec. 2003).
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik
1985 A
Comprehensive Grammar of the English
Language. London: Longman.
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse
Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schourup, Lawrence
2011 “The
Discourse Marker now: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach”. Journal of
Pragmatics 431: 2110–2129.
Tkačuková, Tatiana
2015 “A
Corpus-Assisted Study of the Discourse Marker well as an Indicator of Judges’ Institutional Roles in Court
Cases with Litigants in Person”. Corpora: Corpus-Based Language Learning, Language Processing
and
Linguistics 10 (2): 145–170.
Waring, Hansun Zhang
2012 “Doing Disaffiliation with
now-Prefaced Utterances”. Language and
Communication 3 (3): 265–275.
WordSmith Tools (version 5.0)
2010 PC
software by Mike Scott. Lexical Analysis Software and Oxford University Press.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
CLARIDGE, CLAUDIA, EWA JONSSON & MERJA KYTÖ
2020. Entirely innocent: a historical sociopragmatic analysis of maximizers in theOld Bailey Corpus. English Language and Linguistics 24:4 ► pp. 855 ff. 
Leitner, Magdalena & Andreas H. Jucker
2021. Historical Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 687 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 567 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.