Article published In:
Journal of Historical PragmaticsVol. 21:1 (2020) ► pp.137–164
Text-organizing metadiscourse
Tracking changes in rhetorical persuasion
Published academic writing often seems to be an unchanging form of discourse with its frozen informality remaining
stable over time. Recent work has shown, however, that these texts are highly interactive and dialogic as writers anticipate and
take into account readers’ likely objections, background knowledge, rhetorical expectations and processing needs. In this paper,
we explore one aspect of these interactions and how it has changed over the past fifty years. Focusing on what has been called
interactive metadiscourse (Hyland 2005; Hyland and
Tse 2004), or the ways authors organise their material for particular readers, we analyze a corpus of 2.2 million words
compiled from articles in the top journals in four disciplines to discover whether, and to what extent, interactive metadiscourse
has changed in different disciplines since 1965. The results show a considerable increase in an orientation to the reader over
this period, reflecting changes in both research and publication practices.
Keywords: academic arguments, cohesion, coherence, diachronic change, metadiscourse, textual interaction
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Interactive metadiscourse: Cohesion and interaction
- 3.Corpus and method
- 4.Overall changes in interactive metadiscourse
- 5.Transitions: Expressing textual relationships
- 6.Frame markers: Structuring lines of argument
- 7.Code glosses and endophorics: Elaborating concepts and arguments
- 8.Evidentials: Appealing to textual support
- 9.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References (37)
Abdi, Reza. 2002. “Interpersonal Metadiscourse: An Indicator of Interaction and Identity”. Discourse Studies 4 (2): 139–145. 
Ädel, Annelie and Anna Mauranen. 2010. “Metadiscourse: Diverse and Divided Perspectives”. Nordic Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 1–11.
Aijmer, Karin and Christoph Ruhlemann (eds). 2014. Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anthony, Laurence. 2014. AntConc (Version 3.4.3 w). (Computer Software.) Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available online at: [URL]
Becher, Tony and Paul Trowler. 2001. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Bergs, Alexander and Laurel J. Brinton (eds). 2012. English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
Cao, Feng and Guangwei Hu. 2014. “Interactive Metadiscourse in Research Articles: A Comparative Study of Paradigmatic and Disciplinary Influences”. Journal of Pragmatics 661 (May): 15–31.
Charles, Maggie. 2006. “The Construction of Stance in Reporting Clauses: A Cross-disciplinary Study of Theses”. Applied Linguistics 27 (3): 492–518.
Estaji, Masoomeh and Roya Vafaeimehr. 2015. “A Comparative Analysis of Interactional Metadiscourse Markers in the Introduction and Conclusion Sections of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Research Papers”. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 3 (1): 37–56.
Evans, James A. 2008. “Electronic Publications and the Narrowing of Science and Scholarship”. Science 321 (5887): 395–399.
Gillaerts, Paul and Freek Van de Velde. 2010. “Interactional Metadiscourse in Research Article Abstracts”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9 (2): 128–139.
Hoey, Michael. 1983. On the Surface of Discourse. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Hyland, Ken. 1999. “Talking to Students: Metadiscourse in Introductory Textbooks”. English for Specific Purposes 18 (1): 3–26.
. 2005. Metadiscourse. London: Continuum
. 2007. “Applying a Gloss: Exemplifying and Reformulating in Academic Discourse”. Applied Linguistics 28 (2): 266–285.
. 2017. “Metadiscourse: What is It and Where is It Going?” Journal of Pragmatics 1131 (May): 16–29.
Hyland, Ken and Feng (Kevin) Jiang. 2017. “Is Academic Writing Becoming More Informal?” English for Specific Purposes 451 (January): 40–51.
. 2019. “Points of Reference: Changing Patterns of Academic Citation”. Applied Linguistics 40 (1): 64–85.
Hyland, Ken and Polly Tse. 2004. “Metadiscourse in Scholastic Writing: A Reappraisal”. Applied Linguistics 25 (2): 156–77.
Jiang, Feng (Kevin) and Ken Hyland. 2018. “Nouns and Academic Interactions: A Neglected Feature of Metadiscourse”. Applied Linguistics 39 (4): 508–531.
Jucker, Andreas and Irma Taavitsainen. 2014. “Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics: Intersections and Innovations”. In Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker and Jukka Tuominen (eds), Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics, 3–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Leech, Geoffrey. 2009. “Corpus Linguistics”. In Kirsten Malmkjaer (ed.), The Routledge Linguistics Encyclopedia, 104–113. London: Routledge.
Lin, Hui and Brendan Luyt. 2012. “The Evolution of Scientific Journal Articles in the Periphery: A Case Study and Analysis of the Raffles Bulletin of Zoology from 1928 to 2008”. Journal of Information Science 38 (5): 407–422.
Mauranen, Anna. 1993. Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric: A Textlinguistic Study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Moskowich, Isabel, Gonzalo Camiña Rioboo, Inés Lareo and Begoña Crespo (eds). 2016. “The Conditioned and the Unconditioned”: Late Modern English Texts on Philosophy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dueñas, Pilar Mur. 2007. “‘I/We Focus On…’: A Cross-cultural Analysis of Self-mentions in Business Management Research Articles”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6 (2): 143–162.
Mur Dueñas, Pilar. 2011. “An Intercultural Analysis of Metadiscourse Features in Research Articles Written in English and in Spanish”. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (12): 3068–3079.
Noble, Wendy. 2010. “Understanding Metadiscoursal Use: Lessons from a “Local” Corpus of Learner Academic Writing”. Nordic Journal of Applied Linguistics 9 (2): 145–169.
Rubio, Milagros del Saz. 2011. “A Pragmatic Approach to the Macro-structure and Metadiscoursal Features of Research Article Introductions in the Field of Agricultural Sciences”. English for Specific Purposes 30 (4): 258–271.
Salas, Millaray D. 2015. “Reflexive Metadiscourse in Research Articles in Spanish: Variation across Three Disciplines (Linguistics, Economics and Medicine)”. Journal of Pragmatics 771 (February): 20–40.
Taavitsainen, Irma, Andreas H. Jucker and Jukka Tuominen (eds). 2014. Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thompson, Geoff. 2001. “Interaction in Academic Writing: Learning to Argue with the Reader”. Applied Linguistics 22 (1): 58–78.
Trowler, Paul, Murray Saunders and Veronica Bamber. 2012. Tribes and Territories in the 21st Century. London: Routledge.
Tse, Polly and Ken Hyland. 2006. ““So What is the Problem this Book Addresses?”: Interactions in Academic Book Reviews”. Text and Talk 26 (6): 767–790.
Ware, Mark and Michael Mabe. 2015. The STM Report: An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Publishing. Oxford, STM: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers.
Xia, Jingfeng, Rebekah Lynette Myers and Sara Kay Wilhoite. 2010. “Multiple Open Access Availability and Citation Impact”. Journal of Information Science 37 (1): 19–28.
Cited by (25)
Cited by 25 other publications
Bogdanović, Vesna & Dragana Gak
2024. Framing the Research and Engaging the Reader in Graduate Engineering Students’ Abstracts. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 47:2 ► pp. 238 ff. 
Chen, Songyun, Jiajin Xu & Xin Feng
2024. Sub-disciplinary variation of metadiscursive verb patterns in English research articles: a functional analysis of medical discourse. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 62:1 ► pp. 165 ff.
Lu, Sitong & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2024. One Journal, Different Practices: A Corpus-Based Study of Interactive Metadiscourse in Applied Linguistics
. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 47:2 ► pp. 219 ff.
Narendranath, Aneet D., Sirena Hargrove-Leak & Zachary Thelander
2024. 2024 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm), ► pp. 69 ff.
Triki, Nesrine
2024. Exemplification and reformulation in expert linguists’ writings: Elaborative metadiscourse between disciplinarity and individuality. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 71 ► pp. 101407 ff.
Wei, Jing
2024. Interaction in Chinese Scholars’ Chinese Research Articles. In Tracking Interaction in Chinese Scholars’ Academic Writing, ► pp. 95 ff.
Wei, Jing
2024. Metadiscourse Research: Different Approaches and Perspectives. In Tracking Interaction in Chinese Scholars’ Academic Writing, ► pp. 7 ff.
Wei, Jing
2024. Interaction in Chinese Scholars’ English Research Articles. In Tracking Interaction in Chinese Scholars’ Academic Writing, ► pp. 61 ff.
Zhao, Hongyan & Jingyuan Zhang
2024. Saying verbs in applied linguistics research articles: At the interface of reportage and evaluation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 70 ► pp. 101398 ff.
AKINSEYE, TOLULOPE
2023. Exploring interactive metadiscourse as a practical approach to enhancing academic writing skills of newly admitted undergraduate students in Nigeria. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages 10:2 ► pp. 44 ff.
Dharmavaram Narendranath, Aneet, Zachary Thelander & Sirena Hargrove-Leak
2023. 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings,
Hasan, Eatidal & Alsout Ergaya
2023. A pragmatic approach to the rhetorical analysis and the metadiscourse markers of research article abstracts in the field of applied linguistics. Discourse and Interaction 16:2 ► pp. 51 ff.
Lorés, Rosa
2023. Dual voices, hybrid identities: the recontextualization of research in digital dissemination scientific discourse. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 93 ► pp. 69 ff.
Lorés, Rosa
2024. Digesting Psychology: Metadiscourse as a Recontextualising Tool in the Digital Communication of Disciplinary Research. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 47:2 ► pp. 178 ff.
Pennisi, Giulia Adriana
2023. EALP textbooks and the challenges of legal English education. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages 10:2 ► pp. 62 ff.
Yuvayapan, Fatma & Ilyas Yakut
2023. Disciplinary Variations in Framing Research Articles in the Social Sciences and Humanities. English Studies at NBU 9:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
Zavjalova, Olga Sergeyevna & Christou, Mariya
2023. ОПИСАНИЕ ГРАММАТИЧЕСКИХ СРЕДСТВ УКАЗАНИЯ НА ИСТОЧНИК ИНФОРМАЦИИ В РУССКОМ ЯЗЫКЕ В ЦЕЛЯХ ОБУЧЕНИЯ ИНОСТРАНЦЕВ СОЗДАНИЮ ВТОРИЧНЫХ ТЕКСТОВ. Education & Pedagogy Journal :1(5) ► pp. 82 ff.
Zhou, Hui & Feng Kevin Jiang
2023. ‘The study has clear limitations’: Presentation of limitations in conclusion sections of PhD dissertations and research articles in applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes 71 ► pp. 34 ff.
王, 雯静
2023. Conveying Chinese Stories Effectively—An Exploration of Rhetorical Persuasion in Top Performances from the “FLTRP Cup” National English Speech Contest. Modern Linguistics 11:05 ► pp. 1973 ff.
Chen, Ming & Hui Zhou
2022. Comparison-and-contrast in research articles of applied linguistics: A frame-based analysis. Lingua 276 ► pp. 103387 ff.
Hyland, Ken, Wenbin Wang & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2022. Metadiscourse across languages and genres: An overview. Lingua 265 ► pp. 103205 ff.
Jiang, Feng (Kevin) & Ken Hyland
2022. “The datasets do not agree”: Negation in research abstracts. English for Specific Purposes 68 ► pp. 60 ff.
Liu, Guobing & Yanfang Yang
2021. 2021 the 6th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning, ► pp. 121 ff.
Su, Hang, Yuqing Zhang & Xiaofei Lu
2021. Applying local grammars to the diachronic investigation of discourse acts in academic writing: The case of exemplification in Linguistics research articles. English for Specific Purposes 63 ► pp. 120 ff.
Завьялова, Ольга Сергеевна & Христу, Мария
2021. LINGUODIDAC DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZATION MEANS AS PART OF LINGUISTIC COMPETENCE (PROBLEM STATEMENT). Pedagogical Review :2(36) ► pp. 135 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.