This paper aims to contribute to the study of the first stages of the development of European politeness, through
the analysis of the metalanguage of politeness used in two Latin poems with the title Facetus (Facetus:
cum nihil utilius and Facetus: moribus et vita), both dating from the twelfth century. These two
texts established a fertile genre of behaviour manuals, developed during the Middle Ages both in Latin and in vernacular
languages, and illustrate an intermediary moment of transition from ancient conceptualisations of politeness (given that they
heavily draw on Roman ideas and literature) to early modern ones. The semantic analysis of the Latin politeness meta-terms used in
those poems, such as facetus, decorus, mos or decus, allows us to get a glimpse, through the
emic perspective offered by these meta-terms, of the moral order underlying the code of courtly behaviour.
Brentano, Mary Theresa. 1935. “Relationship of the Latin
Facetus Literature to the Medieval English Courtesy Poems”. Bulletin of
the University of
Kansas 36 (11): 103–235.
Cantavella, Rosanna. 2013. El Facet, una Ars amandi medieval. Edició i estudi [‘The Facet, a
Medieval Ars amandi. Edition and Study’]. Valencia and Barcelona: Institut Interuniversitari de Filologia Valenciana/Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat.
Cantavella, R.2021. “El Facetus ‘Moribus et vita’, el Facet francès i el català, en el context escolar
baixmedieval” [‘The Facetus “Moribus et vita”, the French Facet and the
Catalan Facet, in the Late Medieval School Context’]. In Isabel Müller and Frank Savelsberg (eds), Sabers per als laics: Vernacularització, formació, transmissió (Corona d’Aragó,
1250–1600) [‘Wisdom for Lay People: Vernacularization, Formation,
Transmission (Crown of Aragon 1250–1600)’], 291–314. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.
Dronke, Peter. 1976. “Pseudo-Ovid,
Facetus and the Arts of Love”. Mittellateinisches
Jahrbuch 111: 126–131.
Duby, Georges. 2000. “El modelo cortés” [‘The Courtois
Model’]. In Georges Duby and Michelle Perrot (eds), Historia de las mujeres en Occidente [‘History of Women in the
West’], 301–319. (Volume 31.) Madrid: Taurus. (Spanish
translation of Storie delle donne in
Occidente. 1990. [Volume 21.] Rome and Bari: Laterza.)
Elliott, Alisson Goddard. 1977. “The
Facetus: or, the Art of Courtly
Living”. Allegorica 2 (2): 2–57.
Hall, Jon. 2009. Politeness
and Politics in Cicero’s Letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jaeger, C. Stephen. 1985. The Origins of Courtliness:
Civilizing Trends and the Formation of Courtly Ideals
939–1210. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Kádár, Dániel Z. and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding
Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kádár, Dániel Z. and Sara Mills. 2013. “Rethinking
‘Discernment’”. Journal of Politeness
Research 9 (2): 133–158.
Langosch, Karl. 1976. “Der Facetus, moribus et vita und seine pseudo-ovidiana” [‘The Facetus, Moribus et Vita and its
Pseudo-Ovidiana’]. Mittellateinisches
Jahrbuch 111: 132–142.
Leyerle, Blake. 1995. “Clement
of Alexandria and the Importance of Table Etiquette”. Journal of Early Christian
Studies 3 (2): 123–141.
Luck, Georg. 1958. “Vir
facetus: A Renaissance Ideal”. Studies in
Philology 55 (2): 107–121.
Moisello, Laura. 1993. “Echi ciceroniani in un poema latino del xii secolo” [‘Ciceronian Echoes in a Twelth-Century Latin
Poem’]. Maia 45 (1): 63–71.
Morawski, Joseph. 1923. Le Facet en françoys. Edition critique des cinq traductions des deux Facetus latins avec introduction, notes et
glossaire [‘The Facet in French: Critical Edition of the Five Translations of the
Two Latin Facetus, with an Introduction, Notes, and a
Glossary’]. Poznan: Gebethner i Wolff.
Morel-Fatio, Alfred. 1886. “Mélanges de littérature catalane. iii. Le livre de courtoisie” [‘Mélanges of Catalan Literature. iii. The Book of
Courtesy’]. Romania 15 (58–59): 192–235.
O’Driscoll, Jim. 2010. “Epilogue”. In Jonathan Culpeper and Daniel Z. Kádár (eds), Historical
(Im)Politeness, 265–287. Bern: Peter Lang.
Paternoster, Annick. 2015. Cortesi e scortesi. Percorsi di pragmatica storica da Castiglione a Collodi [‘Polite and Impolite Characters: Pathways into Historical Pragmatics from Castiglione to
Collodi’]. Rome: Carocci.
Paternoster, Annick and Susan Fitzmaurice. 2019. “Politeness
in Nineteenth-Century Europe: A Research Agenda”. In Annick Paternoster and Susan Fitzmaurice (eds), Politeness
in Nineteenth-Century
Europe, 1–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pepin, Ronald E.1999. An English Translation of Auctores
Octo; A Medieval Reader. Lewiston, New York: Edwin Mellen Press.
Ridealgh, Kim and Andreas Jucker. 2019. “Late
Egyptian, Old English and the Re-Evaluation of Discernment Politeness in Remote
Cultures”. Journal of
Pragmatics 1441: 56–66.
Romagnoli, Daniela. 1991. “Cortesia nella città: un modelo complesso. Note sull’etica medievale delle buone
maniere” [‘Politeness in the City: A Complex Model. Notes on the Mediaeval
Ethics on Good Manners’]. In Daniela Romagnoli (ed.), La città e la corte. Buone e cattive maniere tra Medioevo ed Età Moderna [‘The City and the Court: Good and Bad Manners between the Middle Ages and the Modern
Age’], 21–70. Milan: Guerini e Associati.
Roussel, Claude. 1994. “Le legs de la Rose: modèles et préceptes de la sociabilité médiévale” [‘The Legacy of the Rose: Models and Precepts of Mediaeval
Sociability’]. In Alain Montandon (ed.), Pour une histoire des traités de savoir-vivre en Europe [‘For a
History of the Treatises of Savoir Vivre in
Europe’], 1–90. Clermont-Ferrand: Association des Publications de Clermont.
Terkourafi, Marina. 2011. “From
Politeness1 to Politeness2: Tracking Norms of Im/Politeness across Time and Space”. Journal of
Politeness
Research 7 (2): 159–185.
Thiel, Joseph. 1968. “Mittellateinische Nachdichtungen von Ovids Ars amatoria und Remedia
amoris” [‘Medieval Latin Adaptations of Ovid’s Ars
Amatorial and Remedia Amoris
’]. Mittellateinisches
Jahrbuch 51: 115–180.
Unceta Gómez, Luis. 2018. “Gli studi sulla (s)cortesia linguistica in latino. Possibilità di analisi e proposte per il
futuro” [‘The Field of (Im)Politeness Studies in Latin: Possibilities of
Analysis and Proposals for the Future’]. Studi e Saggi
Linguistici 56 (2): 9–37.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.