Cover not available
Article published In:
Corpus-Pragmatic Studies of Democratization in Public Discourses: New perspectives, methods and materials
Edited by Turo Hiltunen, Turo Vartiainen and Jenni Räikkönen
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 25:2] 2024
► pp. 193–214

Colloquialisation

Twenty-five years on

ORCID logo | University of Freiburg
Surveying a representative sample of studies of colloquialisation, a tendency for written norms to move closer to spoken usage, the chapter explores:
i.
the relationship between colloquialisation, operationalised in exclusively linguistic terms, and informalisation and democratisation, two processes primarily targeting wider sociocultural change, and
ii.
complications arising when colloquialisation is extended beyond its original domain of application, standard written English of the ENL type.
There are two major findings. Colloquialisation works less well in the study of ESL varieties than ENL ones. In addition, recent real-time analyses of change in spoken English suggest that the supposedly homogeneous baseline style of informal conversational English is more internally variable than is assumed in current work on colloquialisation.
Keywords: colloquialisation, democratisation, informalisation, discourse change, grammatical change, sociocultural change
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Colloquialisation, conversationalisation, informalisation, democratisation
  • 2. Colloquialisation – historical development and present status of the term
  • 3.Adapting colloquialisation for use in second-language environments
  • 4.Stable baseline or elusive target? Variability within colloquial English
  • 5.New public conversations: An example of colloquialisation-induced semantic change?
  • 6.Conclusions and perspectives for further research
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 August 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00073.mai
References (42)
References
Anchimbe, Eric. 2017. “Postcolonial Pragmatics.” In Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Anne Barron, Yueguo Gu, and Gerard Steen, 105–120. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan. 1988. “Drift in Three English Genres from the 18th to the 20th Centuries: A Multidimensional Approach.” In Corpus Linguistics, Hard and Soft, ed. by Merja Kytö, Ossi Ihalainen, and Matti Rissanen, 83–101. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Bös, Birte, and Sonja Kleinke. 2017. “Publicness and Privateness.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 83–121. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1939. Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation: Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen [‘On the Process of Civilisation: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic investigations’]. 21 vols. Basel: Haus zum Falken.Google Scholar
. 1978. The Civilizing Process. Vol. 11: The History of Manners. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1982. The Civilizing Process. Vol. 21: State Formation and Civilization. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1989. Studien über die Deutschen: Machtkämpfe und Habitusentwicklung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert [‘The Germans: Power Struggles and the Development of Habitus in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries’], ed. by M. Schröter. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
. 2010 [1995]. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Farrelly, Michael, and Elena Seoane. 2012. “Democratization.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, 392–401. Oxford and New York: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González Sanz, Marina. 2016. “Lexical Colloquialisation in the Commissions of the Andalusian Parliament.” In A Gender-based Approach to Parliamentary Discourse: The Andalusian Parliament, ed. by Catalina Fuentes-Rodríguez, and Gloria Álvarez-Benito, 109–128. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, Jenni Räikkönen, and Jukka Tyrkkö. 2020. “Investigating Colloquialization in the British Parliamentary Record in the Late 19th and Early 20th Century.” Language Sciences 791: 101270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, and Christian Mair. 1999. “‘Agile’ and ‘Uptight’ Genres: The Corpus-based Approach to Language Change in Progress.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 41: 221–242. Reprinted in Corpus Linguistics, vol. 31: Varieties, ed. by Douglas Biber, and Randi Reppen, 199–216. Sage Benchmarks in Language and Linguistics. Los Angeles CA: Sage, 2012. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas. 1992. Social Stylistics: Syntactic Variation in British Newspapers. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1985. “Standards, Codification, and Sociolinguistic Realism: The English Language in the Outer Circle.” In English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, ed. by Randolph Quirk, and Henry Widdowson, 11–30. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1992. “World Englishes: Approaches, Issues and Resources.” Language Teaching 25 (1): 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, Peter, and Wulf Oesterreicher. 1985. “Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte.” Romanistisches Jahrbuch 361: 15–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Language of Immediacy – Language of Distance: Orality and Literacy from the Perspective of Language Theory and Linguistic History.” In Communicative Spaces. Variation, Contact and Change, ed. by Claudia Lange, Beatrix Weber, and Göran Wolf, 441–473. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
Kruger, Haidee, and Adam Smith. 2018. “Colloquialization versus Densification in Australian English: Multidimensional Analysis of the Australian Diachronic Hansard Corpus (ADHC).” Australian Journal of Linguistics 38 (3): 293–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2004. Meaning and the English Verb. 3rd ed. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical study. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ljung, Magnus. 1980. Reflections on the English Progressive. Gothenburg Studies in English 46. Göteborg: University Library.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 1997. “Parallel Corpora: A Real-time Approach to the Study of Language Change in Progress.” In Corpus-based Studies in English, ed. by Magnus Ljung. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 195–209. Reprinted in Critical Concepts in Linguistics – Corpus Linguistics, Vol. 2, ed. by Wolfgang Teubert, and Ramesh Krishnamurthy, 77–90. London: Routledge, 2007, and in Diacronia 1 (2015): 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. “Corpora and the Study of the Major Varieties of English: Issues and Results.” In The Major Varieties of English: Papers from MAVEN 97, Växjö 20–22 November 1997, ed. by Hans Lindquist, Staffan Glintford, Magnus Levin, and Maria Estling, 139–157. Växjö: Växjö University.Google Scholar
. 2006. Twentieth-century English: History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian, and Marianne Hundt. 1995. “Why Is the Progressive Becoming More Frequent in English? A Corpus-based Investigation of Language Change in Progress.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 43 (2): 111–122.Google Scholar
Montes-Alcalá, Cecilia. 2016. “ iSwitch: Spanish-English Mixing in Computer-mediated Communication.” Journal of Language Contact 9 (1): 23–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2015. “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, 3rd ed, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 23–61. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rohe, Udo. 2019. The Progressive in Present-day Spoken English: Real-time Studies of its Spread and Functional Diversification. PhD, University of Freiburg. [URL]
Schneider, Klaus P., and Anne Barron. 2008. Variational Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seoane, Elena. 2006. “Changing Styles: On the Recent Evolution of Scientific British and American English.” In Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000, ed. by Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Dieter Kastovsky, Nikolaus Ritt, and Herbert Schendl, 191–211. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Siemund, Rainer. 1995. “‘For Who the Bell Tolls’ – Why Corpus Linguistics Should Carry the Bell in the Study of Language Change in Progress in Present-day English.” Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 20 (2): 351–377.Google Scholar
Smith, Nicholas. 2002. “Ever Moving On? The Progressive in Recent British English.” In New Frontiers of Corpus Research: Papers from the Twenty-first International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Sydney 2000, ed. by Pam Peters, Peter Collins, and Adam Smith, 317–330. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “Conversationalization and Democratization in a Radio Chat Show: A Grammar-led Investigation. Language Sciences 791: 101269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smitterberg, Erik. 2005. The Progressive in 19th-century English: A Process of Integration. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “The Progressive and Phrasal Verbs: Evidence of Colloquialization in Nineteenth-century English.” In The Dynamics of Linguistic Variation: Corpus Evidence on English Past and Present, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen, Irma Taavitsainen, Päivi Pahta, and Minna Korhonen, 269–289. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vis, Kirsten. 2011. Subjectivity in News Discourse: A Corpus Linguistic Analysis of Informalization. Oisterwijk: Uitgiverij BOXPress.Google Scholar
Werner, Valentin. 2021. “Text-linguistic Analysis of Performed Language: Revisiting and Remodeling Koch & Oesterreicher.” Linguistics 59 (3): 541–575. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wouters, Cas. 2007. Informalization: Manners and Emotions since 1890. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yao, Xinyue, and Peter Collins. 2018. “Exploring Grammatical Colloquialisation in Non-native English: A Case Study of Philippine English.” English Language and Linguistics 22 (3): 457–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar