This paper seeks to explain the radical decrease in the use of the passive voice in Present-day English scientific discourse. A number of different linguistic factors having been discounted in previous research, it is hypothesised here that passives are being omitted for two reasons. Firstly, they became conventionalised in scientific discourse and subsequently lost the pragmatic function which originally justified their high frequency in scientific texts. Secondly, over the course of the twentieth century two sociocultural circumstances converge that exert pressure on conventionalised passives to disappear, namely (i) the increasing competitiveness in the scientific community, and (ii) the democratisation of discourse. This hypothesis is tested in the present paper by analysing the function of passives in scientific discourse before the drop in frequency began, that is, in Late Modern English (1700–1900). With data from ARCHER and other sources I will try to show that passives in Late Modern scientific English exemplify the conventionalisation and loss of contextual function of pragmatic strategies, a scenario that, given the right sociohistorical conditions, leads to linguistic change.
2024. ‘I am sorry, but I have to speak Korean’: stancetaking through apology in public speech at an ‘English only’ Korean university. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 45:4 ► pp. 1171 ff.
Zhang, Yiming & Lei Zhang
2024. Tracking the changing patterns of graphic data commentary in economics research articles over time: A local grammar study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 72 ► pp. 101437 ff.
Jiang, Feng (Kevin) & Ken Hyland
2023. Changes in Research Abstracts: Past Tense, Third Person, Passive, and Negatives. Written Communication 40:1 ► pp. 210 ff.
Plotnick, Jerry
2023. The Unsettled History of Passive Voice in the Sciences: The Royal Society, 1665–2020. Perspectives on Science 31:3 ► pp. 293 ff.
Yin, Shuhui, Yuan Gao & Xiaofei Lu
2023. Diachronic changes in the syntactic complexity of emerging Chinese international publication writers’ research article introductions: A rhetorical strategic perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 61 ► pp. 101205 ff.
Li, Zhijun
2022. Is academic writing less passivized? Corpus-based evidence from research article abstracts in applied linguistics over the past three decades (1990–2019). Scientometrics 127:10 ► pp. 5773 ff.
Mu, Congjun
2021. A multidimensional contrastive analysis of linguistic features between international and local biology journal English research articles. Scientometrics 126:9 ► pp. 7901 ff.
Su, Hang, Yuqing Zhang & Xiaofei Lu
2021. Applying local grammars to the diachronic investigation of discourse acts in academic writing: The case of exemplification in Linguistics research articles. English for Specific Purposes 63 ► pp. 120 ff.
Wang, Jingjing & Liangjing Zeng
2021. Disciplinary Recognized Self-Presence: Self-Mention Used With Hedges and Boosters in PhD Students’ Research Writing. Sage Open 11:2
Wheeler, Melissa A., Ekaterina Vylomova, Melanie J. McGrath & Nick Haslam
2021. More confident, less formal: stylistic changes in academic psychology writing from 1970 to 2016. Scientometrics 126:12 ► pp. 9603 ff.
Chen, Lang & Guangwei Hu
2020. Surprise markers in applied linguistics research articles: A diachronic perspective. Lingua 248 ► pp. 102992 ff.
Leong, Alvin Ping
2020. The passive voice in scientific writing through the ages: A diachronic study. Text & Talk 40:4 ► pp. 467 ff.
2020. Research in foreign language didactics III, ► pp. 125 ff.
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula
2019. The English Phrasal Verb, 1650–Present,
Alipour, Mohammad & Mona Nooreddinmoosa
2018. Informality in Applied Linguistics Research Articles: Comparing Native and Non-Native Writings. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics 4:2 ► pp. 349 ff.
Hundt, Marianne, Gerold Schneider & Elena Seoane
2016. The use of thebe-passive in academic Englishes: localversusglobal usage in an international language. Corpora 11:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2016. Change of Attitude? A Diachronic Study of Stance. Written Communication 33:3 ► pp. 251 ff.
Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2017. Is academic writing becoming more informal?. English for Specific Purposes 45 ► pp. 40 ff.
Patience, Gregory S., Daria C. Boffito & Paul A. Patience
2016. How do you write and present research well? 3—shave your text with Occam's Razor. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 94:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.