Review published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 14:1 (2013) ► pp.131137
References (11)
References
Athanasiadou, Angeliki, Costas Canakis and Bert Cornillie (eds.). 2006. Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter. 2009. Modals and Quasi-Modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denison, David. 2002. History of the sort of Construction Family. Paper presented at ICCG2 , Helsinki, 6–8 September 2002.
. 2005. The Grammaticalisation of sort of, kind of and type of in English. Paper presented at NRG3 , Santiago de Compostela, 17–20 July 2005.
Jucker, Andreas H. 1997. The Discourse Marker well in the History of English. English Language and Linguistics 11, 91–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía. 2005. Force Dynamics: The Key for an Interpretation of Modal Necessity in Old English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen CVI.2, 211–227.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Keith. 2003. Had better and might as well: On the Margins of Modality? In: Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug and Frank Palmer (eds.). Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 129–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Opdahl, Lise. 2000. LY or Zero Suffix?: A Study in Variation of Dual-Form Adverbs in Present Day English, vols. 1–21. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank. 2003. Modality in English: Theoretical, Descriptive and Typological Issues. In: Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug and Frank Palmer (eds.). Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, and Astrid De Wit. 2010. The English Comparative Modals: A Pilot Study. In: Bert Cappelle and Naoaki Wada (eds.). Distinctions in English Grammar, Offered to Renaat Declerck. Tokyo: Kaitakusha, 127–147.Google Scholar