Article published in:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 16:1 (2015) ► pp. 109141
References

References

Adams, James
1994Wackernagel’s Law and the Placement of the Copula esse in Classical Latin. Cambridge: Philological Society.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira
1990Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bassarak, Armin
1987 “Parenthesen als illokutive Handlungen”. In Wolfgang Motsch (ed.), Satz, Text, sprachliche Handlungen, 163–78. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Birner, Betty
1997 “The Linguistic Realization of Inferrable Information”. Language and Communication 17: 133–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006a “Semantic and Pragmatic Contributions to Information Status”. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 38: 14–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006b “Inferential Relations and Noncanonical Word Order”. In Betty Birner and Gregory Ward (eds), Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn, 31–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Birner, Betty and Gregory Ward
1998Information Status and Noncanonical Word Order in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolkestein, Machtelt
1991 “Causally Related Predications and the Choice between Parataxis and Hypotaxis in Latin”. In Robert Coleman (ed.), New Studies in Latin Linguistics, 427–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1991 [1976] “Mica: note di sintassi e pragmatica”. Teoria linguistica e sintassi italiana, 311–23. Bologna: Il Mulino (originally published in Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia, Università di Padova 1: 101–112).Google Scholar
Danckaert, Lieven
2012Latin Embedded Clauses: The Left Periphery. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “ Quidem as a Marker of Emphatic Polarity”. Transactions of the Philological Society 112: 97–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
In preparation. “ quidem and contrastivity”. Manuscript. Ghent University.
Declerck, Renaat and Susan Reed
2001Conditionals: A Comprehensive Empirical Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole and Yordanka Kavalova
(eds) 2007Parentheticals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew
1996 “Focus, Pragmatic Presupposition and Activated Propositions”. Journal of Pragmatics 26: 475–523. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald
1973La preuve et le dire. Paris: Maison Mame.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Kerstin Fischer
2007 “Introduction”. In Anita Fetzer and Kerstin Fischer (eds), Lexical Markers of Common Grounds, 1–13. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fugier, Huguette
1989 “ Quod, quia, quoniam et leurs effets textuels chez Cicéron”. In Gualtiero Calboli (ed.), Subordination and Other Topics in Latin, 91–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1978 “Negation in Language: Pragmatics, Function, Ontology”. In Peter Cole (ed.), Pragmatics, 69–112. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Glare, Paul
(ed.) 1968Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert
1975 “Logic and Conversation”. In Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan (eds), Speech Acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2010 “The Internal Syntax of Adverbial Clauses”. Lingua 120: 628–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael and Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hernanz, M. Lluïsa
2007 “From Polarity to Modality: Some (A)symmetries between bien and in Spanish”. In Luis Eguren and Olga Fernández Soriano (eds), Coreference, Modality and Focus, 133–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Assertive bien in Spanish and the Left Periphery”. In Paola Benincà and Nicola Munaro (eds), Mapping the Left Periphery, 19–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence
2001A Natural History of Negation. 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim
1997 “I-Topikalisierung”. Linguistische Berichte 169: 91–133.Google Scholar
Johnston, Michael
1994The Syntax and Semantics of Adverbial Adjuncts. PhD thesis. University of California at Santa Cruz.
Kaiser, Elsi
2004 “Negation and the Left Periphery in Finnish”. Lingua 116: 314–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1999 “Beyond ‘Oops’ and ‘Ouch’: How Descriptive and Expressive Meaning Interact.” Paper presented at the Cornell Conference on Theories of Context Dependency. Available online at: http://​semanticsarchive​.net​/Archive​/WEwNGUyO​/Beyond%20%22Ouch%22%20and%20%22Oops%22​.pdf)
Kroon, Caroline
1995Discourse Particles in Latin: A Study of nam, enim, autem, vero and at. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
2004 “Latin quidem and the Structure of the Move”. In Henk Aertsen, Mike Hannay and Rod Lyall (eds), Words in their Places: A Festschrift for J. Lachlann Mackenzie, 199–209. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.Google Scholar
2005 “The Relationship between Grammar and Discourse: Evidence from the Latin Particle quidem ”. In Gualtiero Calboli (ed.), Papers on Grammar IX, 577–90. Roma: Herder.Google Scholar
2009 “Latin Linguistics between Grammar and Discourse: Units of Analysis, Levels of Analysis”. In Elisabeth Rieken and Paul Widmer (eds), Pragmatische Kategorien: Form, Funktion und Diachronie, 143–58. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
2011 “Latin Particles and the Grammar of Discourse”. In James Clackson (ed.), A Companion to the Latin Language, 176–95. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mellet, Sylvie
1995 “ Quando, quia, quod, quoniam: analyse énonciative et syntaxique des conjonctions de cause en latin”. In Dominique Longrée (ed.), De usu: études de syntaxe latine offertes en hommage à Marius Lavency, 211–28. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2003 “Remarks on Stripping”. Ms. University of Chicago. Available online at: http://​home​.uchicago​.edu​/~merchant​/pubs​/stripping​.pdf
Pasch, Renate
1987 “Illokutionsstrukturtypen und Typen der Verknüpfung von Inhalten illokutiver Handlungen”. In Wolfgang Motsch (ed.), Satz, Text, sprachliche Handlungen, 119–61. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm
1972On Latin Adverbs. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
1990Latin Syntax and Semantics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2009 “De Latijnse voegwoorden quia en quoniam (en Nederlands aangezien)”. In Egbert Beijk, Lut Colman, Marianne Göbel, Frans Heyvaert, Tanneke Schoonheim, Rob Tempelaars and Vivien Waszink (eds), Fons Verborum: feestbundel Fons Moerdijk, 313–20. Leiden: INL.Google Scholar
2010 “The Use of quia and quoniam in Cicero, Seneca, and Tertullian”. In D. Richard Page and Aaron D. Rubin (eds), Studies in Classical Linguistics in Honor of Philip Baldi, 81–95. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2002 “The Lexical Semantics of Parenthetical-as and Appositive-which ”. Syntax 5: 55–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen
1981 “Towards a Taxonomy of Given-New Information”. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, 223–56. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1986 “On the Syntactic Marking of Presupposed Open Propositions”. Chicago Linguistic Society 22: 208–22.Google Scholar
1992 “The ZPG Letter: Subjects, Definiteness and Information-Status”. In William Mann and Sandra Thompson (eds), Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text, 295–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rosén, Hannah
2008 “Latin Epitaxis in Historical and Typological View”. In Gualtiero Calboli (ed.), Papers on Grammar X, 205–242. Roma: Herder.Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott
2003 “ No and tampoco: A Pragmatic Distinction in Spanish Negation”. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 999–1030. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 “The Pragmatics of Negation in Brazilian Portuguese”. Lingua 115: 1427–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Solodow, Joseph
1978The Latin Particle quidem. Boulder: Johnson Co.Google Scholar
Spevak, Olga
2010Constituent Order in Classical Latin Prose. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thim-Mabrey, Christiane
1982 “Zur Syntax der kausalen Konjunktionen weil, da und denn ”. Sprachwissenschaft 7: 197–219.Google Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2007Rethinking the Coordinate–Subordinate Dichotomy: Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, Susanne
2005Ellipsis and Focus in Generative Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella
1997Negation and Clausal Structure: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Malte
2011 “Discourse Particles”. In Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn and Paul Portner (eds), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, vol. 2, 2012–38. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar