Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 16:2 (2015) ► pp.250–276

The rise of demonstrative-based first/second-person markers in the history of Japanese

A speaker subjectivity account

| University of Malaya, Malaysia
This paper explores the rise of demonstrative-based person markers in the history of Japanese and takes Ishiyama’s spatial semantic approach as its point of departure. Despite the claim that demonstrative-based person markers remained functionally demonstrative, I argue that they began to manifest the category of person from an early stage of their development; that is to say, thanks to speaker innovation, demonstratives underwent semantic re-analysis to become markers representing the speaker’s ego in the reality of discourse. This paper also pinpoints that two notions, distancing and dissimilarity, are not spelled out in Ishiyama’s framework. In conclusion, the substitution of the first-person marker for the second-person marker is analysed tentatively using Keller’s theory of linguistic signs.
Keywords: speaker innovation, linguistic signs, Japanese, demonstrative-based person markers, the category of person
Published online: 28 January 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.16.2.05yam
References (43)
CDJL, Comprehensive Dictionary of Japanese Language, IV (Kokugo Dai-jiten V). Tokyo: Sanseido. 1972.
Imamiya no Shinjū [Love Suicides in Imamiya]. 1711. By Monzaemon Chikamatsu. In Tameo Yamane (ed.), Chikamatsu Monzaemon Shū [‘A Collection of Chikamatsu Monzaemon’s Works’1]. Tokyo: Shogakukan. 1998.Google Scholar
Izayoi Nikki [Izayoi Diary]. 1279. By Abutsuni. In Miyoko Iwasa (ed.), Chūsei Nikki Kikō-shū [Diaries and Travel Essays in the Medieval Period]. Tokyo: Shogakukan. 1994.Google Scholar
Kagerō Nikki [Kagero Diary). 974–995. By the mother of Michitsuna. In Tsutomu Kakimoto (ed.), Kagerō Nikki Zen Chūshaku [A Completely Annotated Edition of Kagero Diary]. Tokyo: Kadokawa. 1966.Google Scholar
KCDCJ, Kadokawa Comprehensive Dictionary of Classical Japanese (Kadokawa Kogo Dai-jiten). Tokyo: Kadokawa. 1982, 1984, 1987.Google Scholar
Kōshoku Gonin Onna [Five Women Who Loved Love]. 1686. By Saikau Ihara. In Kingoro Maeda (ed.), Kōshoku Gonin Onna Zen Chūshaku [A Completely Annotated Edition of the Koshoku Gonin Onna ]. Tokyo: Benseisha. 1992.Google Scholar
Tsurezuregusa (Essays in Idleness). c.1331. By Kenkō Yoshida. In Kōsaku Yasuraoka (ed.), Tsurezuregusa Zen Chūshaku [A Completely Annotaed Edition of Tsurezuregusa]. Tokyo: Kadokawa. 1967/1968.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1971 [1966]. Problems in General Linguistics. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Bhat, Darbe Narayana Shankara. 2004. Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blank, Andreas. 1999. “Why Do New Meanings Occur? A Cognitive Typology of the Motivations for Lexical Semantic Change”. In Andreas Blank and Peter Koch (eds), Historical Semantics and Cognition, 61–89. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, Function, and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Demonstratives”. In Keith Brown (editor-in-chief), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 430–35. Second edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doi, Yoichi. 1982. “Kindai no Bunpō I” [A Grammar of Recent Modern Period I]. In Hiroshi Tsukishima (ed.), Bunpōshi [A History of Grammar], 387–465. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Forchheimer, Paul. 1953. The Category of Person in Language. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortson IV, Benjamin W. 2003. “An Approach to Semantic Change”. In Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 648–66. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frellesvig, Bjarke. 2010. A History of the Japanese Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gendai Yōgo no Kiso Chishiki [The Encyclopaedia of Contemporary Words]. Tokyo: Jiyu Kokumin.
Heine, Bernd and Kyung-An Song. 2011. “On the Grammaticalization of Personal Pronouns”. Journal of Linguistics 471: 587–630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishiyama, Osamu. 2012. “The Diachronic Relationship between Demonstratives and First/Second Person Pronouns”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13 (1): 50–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itkonen, Esa. 2003. What is Language? A Study in the Philosophy of Linguistics. Åbo: Åbo Akademisk Tryckeri.Google Scholar
James, William. 1962. Psychology: Briefer Course. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1998 [1995]. A Theory of Linguistic Signs. Translated by Kimberley Duenwald. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Yoshinori. 1982. “Kodai no Bunpō” [Grammar of Ancient Times]. In Hiroshi Tsukishima (ed.), The History of Grammar [Bunpōsi], 149–386. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Levelt, Willem J.M. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1996. “Perspective Taking and Ellipsis in Spatial Descriptions”. In Paul Bloom, Mary A. Peterson, Lynn Nadel and Merrill F. Garrett (eds), Language and Space, 77–107. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. 2004 [1975]. A Reference Grammar of Japanese. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter Hugoe. 2007. Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics. Second edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morino, Muneaki. 1971. “Kodai no keigo” [Honorifics in Ancient Times]. In Toshiki Tsujimura (ed.), Keigoshi [History of Honorifics], 97–182. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter and Rom Harré. 1990. Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ono, Susumu. 1966. Nihongo no Nenrin [The Rings of Japanese Language]. Tokyo: Shinchosha.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter and Zoltán Kövecses. 1999. “Towards a Theory of Metonymy”. In Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden (eds), Metonymy in Language and Thought, 17–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sakanashi, Takazo. 1982. “Kindai no Bunpō II” [A Grammar of Muromachi and Edo Periods II]. In Hiroshi Tsukishiima (ed.), Bunpōshi [A History of Grammar], 467–536. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Saxena, Anju. 2006. “Pronouns”. In Keith Brown (editor-in-chief), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 131–3. Second edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibasaki, Reijirou. 2010. “Frequency as a Cause of Semantic Change: With Focus on the Second Person Form omae in Japanese”. In An Van linden, Jean-Christophe Verstraete and Kristin Davidse (eds), Formal Evidence in Grammaticalization Research, 225–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shirane, Haruo. 2005. Classical Japanese: A Grammar. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Akio. 1980. “Daimeisi” [Pronouns]. In Kokugo-gakkai [Society for the Study of Japanese Language] (ed.), Kokugogaku Daijiten [A Comprehensive Dictionary of Japanese Linguistics], 580–1. Tokyo: Tokyodo.Google Scholar
Tokiwa, Tomoko. 2004. “Eiwa Nichiyō Ku Shū No Ninshōdaimeishi” [Personal Pronouns in English and Japanese in Everyday Conversations]”. In Kindaigo-kenkyū [Studies on Early Modern Japanese] vol. 121, Kindaigo-gakkai [The Association of Early Modern Japanese], 293–307. Tokyo: Musashino.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Werner, Abraham. 2011. “Preface: Traces of Bühler’s Semiotic Legacy in Modern Linguistics”. In Karl Bühler (ed.), Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language, xiii–xlvii. Translated by Donald Fraser Goodwin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Blue and Brown Books: Preliminary Studies for the Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yamazaki, Hisayuki. 1963. Kokugo Taigū Hyōgen Taikei no Kenkyū: Kinsei-hen [A Study on the System of Expressions of Social Verbal Interactions in Japanese: Muromachi and Edo Version]. Tokyo: Musashino.Google Scholar
. 1990. Zoku Kokugo Taigū Hyōgen Taikei no Kenkyū [A Study on the System of Expressions of Social Verbal Interactions in Japanese, Second Series]. Tokyo: Musashino.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Jucker, Andreas H.
2018. Historische Pragmatik. In Handbuch Pragmatik, ► pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Diachrony of Personal Pronouns in Japanese [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 344], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.