Article published in:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 17:1 (2016) ► pp. 2654
References

Sources

BNC British National Corpus
Version 3 (BNC XML Edition) 2007 Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. http://​www​.natcorp​.ox​.ac​.uk/Google Scholar
COHA The Corpus of Historical American English
2010– Compiled by Mark Davies. Brigham Young University. http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coha/Google Scholar
DOEC Dictionary of Old English Corpus
2011 Original release 1981 compiled by Angus Cameron, Ashley Crandell Amos, Sharon Butler and Antonette diPaolo Healey. Release 2009 compiled by Antonette diPaolo Healey, Joan Holland, Ian McDougall and David McDougall, with Xin Xiang. University of Toronto. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/CoRD​/corpora​/DOEC​/index​.htmlGoogle Scholar
HC Helsinki Corpus of English Texts
1991 Compiled by Matti Rissanen (Project leader), Merja Kytö (Project secretary); Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, Matti Kilpiö (Old English); Saara Nevanlinna, Irma Taavitsainen (Middle English); Terttu Nevalainen, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (Early Modern English). Department of English, University of Helsinki. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/CoRD​/corpora​/HelsinkiCorpus​/index​/htmlGoogle Scholar
ICE-GB International Corpus of English–Great Britain
MED The Middle English Dictionary
1956–2001 Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. http://​www​.hti​.umich​.edu​/dict​/med/Google Scholar
OBP The Old Bailey Proceedings Online, 1674–1913
2012Tim Hitchcock, Robert Shoemaker, Clive Emsley, Sharon Howard and Jamie McLaughlin, et al., version 7.0. www​.oldbaileyonline​.orgGoogle Scholar
OED Oxford English Dictionary
Shakespeare
1974G. Blakemore Evans et al. (eds), The Riverside Shakespeare. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Shakespeare Corpus
Compiled by Mike Scott. http://​www​.lexically​.net
YP The York Plays
1982Richard Beadle (ed.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar

References

Aimer, Karin
1986 “Why is Actually so Popular in Spoken English?” In Gunnel Tottie and Ingegerd Bäcklund (eds), English in Speech and Writing: A Symposium, 119–27. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
2002English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Gisle
2001Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation: A Relevance-theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate and Ulrich Detges
2014a “Introduction”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 1–23. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(eds) 2014bDiscourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Blake, Norman F.
2002A Grammar of Shakespeare’s Language. New York: Palgrave.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte, Lobke Ghesquière and Freek Van de Velde
(eds) 2012Intersections of Intersubjectivity, special issue of English Text Construction 5 (1).Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 “Historical Discourse Analysis”. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen and Heidi E. Hamilton (eds), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 138–50. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2008The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bromhead, Helen
2009The Reign of Truth and Faith: Epistemic Expressions in 16th and 17th Century English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Ruth
2008 “Historical English Phraseology and the Extender Tag”. Journal of the Spanish Society for Medieval English Language and Literature (SELIM) 15 (1): 7–38.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2000Explaining Language Change. Harlow, Essex: Longman, Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö
2000 “Data in Historical Pragmatics: Spoken Interaction (Re)cast as Writing”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1 (2): 175–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Defour, Tine
2008 “The Speaker’s Voice: A Diachronic Study on the Use of well and now as Pragmatic Markers”. English Text Construction 1 (1): 62–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole and Bettina Braun
2013 “The Prosody of Question Tags”. English Language and Linguistics 17 (1): 129–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole and Anne Wichmann
2010a “The Multifunctionality of Epistemic Parentheticals in Discourse: Prosodic Cues to the Semantic–Pragmatic Boundary”. Functions of Language 17 (1): 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010b “Sentence-Initial I think (that) and I believe (that): Prosodic Evidence for Use as Main Clause, Comment Clause and Discourse Marker”. Studies in Language 34 (1): 36–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2012 “The Course of Actualization”. Language 88 (3): 601–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Detges, Ulrich and Richard Waltereit
2009 “Diachronic Pathways and Pragmatic Strategies: Different Types of Pragmatic Particles from a Diachronic Point of View”. In Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen and Jacqueline Visconti (eds), Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics, 43–61. Bingley, UK: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “ Moi je ne sais pas vs. Je ne sais pas moi. French Disjoint Pronouns in the Left and Right Periphery”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 24–46. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2002 “A Model for Relevant Types of Contexts in Grammaticalization”. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds), New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 103–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dines, Elizabeth R.
1980 “Variation in Discourse – and Stuff Like That”. Language in Society 9 (1): 13–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Estélles, María Arguedos and Salvador Pons Bordería
2011“Absolute Initial Position”. MS. University of Valencia.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
(ed.) 2006Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1990 “An Approach to Discourse Markers”. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (3): 383–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996 “Pragmatic Markers”. Pragmatics 6 (1): 167–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Towards a Theory of Discourse Markers”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 189–204. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Lilian and Virginia Hill
2010 “The Syntacticization of Discourse”. Available online at: http://​www​.gist​.ugent​.be​/file​/164 (accessed 27 March 2013).
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
1998The Function of Discourse Particles: A Study with Special Reference to Spoken Standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2011 “Discourse Marker and Modal Particle: The Functions of Utterance-Final then in Spoken English”. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (14): 3603–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012a “Discourse Organization and the Rise of Final then in the History of English”. In Irén Hegedüs and Alexandra Fodor (eds), English Historical Linguistics 2010. Selected Papers from the Sixteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 16), Pécs, 23–27 August 2010 , 153–75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref
2012b “Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity and the Negotiation of Common Ground in Spoken Discourse: Final Particles in English”. Language and Communication 32 (3): 182–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian
2006 “Tag Questions in Early and Late Modern English: Historical Description and Theoretical Implications”. Anglistik 17 (1): 35–55.Google Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly
1994Evidentials and Relevance. PhD thesis. University College London.
Jucker, Andreas H.
(ed.) 1995Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2005 “Charting the Boundaries of Syntax: A Taxonomy of Spoken Parenthetical Clauses”. View[z]: Vienna Working Papers 14: 21–53. Available online at: http://​anglistik​.univie​.ac​.at​/fileadmin​/user​_upload​/dep​_anglist​/weitere​_Uploads​/Views​/Views0501ALL​.pdf (accessed 17 March 2013).Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine and Tania Kuteva
2011 “On Thetical Grammar”. Studies in Language 35 (4): 852–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger
2000 “Language Periodization and the Concept ‘Middle’”. In Irma Taavitsainen, Terttu Nevalainen, Päivi Pahta and Matti Rissanen (eds), Placing Middle English in Context, 7–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lenker, Ursula
2010Argument and Rhetoric: Adverbial Connectors in the History of English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Diana M.
2006 “Discourse Markers in English: A Discourse-Pragmatic View”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 61–76. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lutzky, Ursula
2012Discourse Markers in Early Modern English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Jean and Sandra A. Thompson
2008 “The Grammaticalization of but as a Final Particle in Conversation”. In Laury Ritva (ed.), Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunction, 179–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Jean, Sandra A. Thompson and Cara Penry Williams
2009 “Final but in Australian English”. In Pam Peters, Peter Collins and Adam Smith (eds), Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English, 339–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann
1999Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pichler, Heike and Stephen Levey
2010 “Variability in the Co-occurrence of Discourse Features”. University of Reading Language Studies Working Papers 2: 17–27.Google Scholar
2011 “In Search of Grammaticalization in Synchronic Dialect Data: General Extenders in Northeast England”. English Language and Linguistics 15: 441–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Redeker, Gisela
2006 “Discourse Markers as Attentional Cues at Discourse Transitions”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 339–58. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence
1982 “Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation”. Working Papers in Linguistics 28. Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Spevak, Marvin
1973The Harvard Concordance to Shakespeare. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita, Gisle Andersen and Ingrid Kristine Hasund
2002Trends in Teenage Talk: Corpus Compilation, Analysis, and Findings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swan, Toril
1988Sentence Adverbials in English: A Synchronic and Diachronic Investigation. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma
1995 “Interjections in Early Modern English: From Imitation of Spoken to Conventions of Written Language”. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, 439–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 “Exclamations in Late Middle English”. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Studies in Middle English Linguistics, 373–607. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. and Anthony J. Mulac
1991 “A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticalization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English”. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2: 313–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel and Sebastian Hoffmann
2009 “Tag Questions in English – The First Century”. Journal of English Linguistics 37 (2): 130–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2012 “Intersubjectification and Clause Periphery”. In Lieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière and Freek Van de Velde (eds), Intersections of Intersubjectivity, special issue of English Text Construction, 5 (1): 57–28.Google Scholar
2015 “Investigating ‘Periphery’ from a Functionalist Perspective”. In Alexander Bergs, Abigail C. Cohn and Jeff Good (eds), Linguistic Vanguard 1, 119–30. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale
2010 “Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization: How Do They Intersect?” In Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Graeme Trousdale (eds), Gradience, Gradualness, and Grammaticalization, 19–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walkden, George
2013 “The Status of hwæt in Old English”. English Language and Linguistics 17: 465–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov and Marvin Herzog
1968 “Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change”. In W.P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel (eds), Directions for Historical Linguistics, 95–189. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
2006English: Meaning and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 22 other publications

Beeching, Kate
2018.  In Positioning the Self and Others [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 292],  pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo
Chen, Jiajun
2017. Dialogicity in dialogue: Deriving Chinese discourse marker bieshuo from the negative imperative. Journal of Pragmatics 110  pp. 34 ff. Crossref logo
Chen, Jiajun
2018. (Inter)subjectification at the left and right periphery: Deriving Chinese pragmatic marker bushi from the negative copula. Language Sciences 66  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Cuenca, Maria Josep
2020. Defective Connective Constructions: Some Cases in Catalan and Spanish. Corpus Pragmatics 4:4  pp. 423 ff. Crossref logo
Haselow, Alexander
2019. Discourse marker sequences: Insights into the serial order of communicative tasks in real-time turn production. Journal of Pragmatics 146  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Haselow, Alexander & Sylvie Hancil
2021.  In Studies at the Grammar-Discourse Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series, 219],  pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2018.  In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],  pp. 381 ff. Crossref logo
Jucker, Andreas H.
2018.  In Handbuch Pragmatik,  pp. 132 ff. Crossref logo
Kuteva, Tania, Seongha Rhee, Debra Ziegeler & Jessica Sabban
2018. On sentence-final “what” in Singlish: Are you the Queen of England, or what?. Journal of Language Contact 11:1  pp. 32 ff. Crossref logo
Lewis, Diana M.
2018.  In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],  pp. 135 ff. Crossref logo
Mazzon, Gabriella
2019. Variation in the expression of stance across varieties of English. World Englishes 38:4  pp. 593 ff. Crossref logo
MYCOCK, LOUISE & JAMES MISSON
2021. Lone pronoun tags in Early Modern English: ProTag constructions in the dramas of Jonson, Marlowe and Shakespeare. English Language and Linguistics 25:2  pp. 379 ff. Crossref logo
Pichler, Heike
2021. Grammaticalization and language contact in a discourse-pragmatic change in progress: The spread of innit in London English. Language in Society  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Ruskan, Anna
2019. Functional Variation of Discourse Particles in Lithuanian: A Look at Clause Peripheries. Corpus Pragmatics 3:4  pp. 303 ff. Crossref logo
Tantucci, Vittorio
2021.  In Language and Social Minds, Crossref logo
Tantucci, Vittorio & Aiqing Wang
2018. Illocutional concurrences: The case of evaluative speech acts and face-work in spoken Mandarin and American English. Journal of Pragmatics 138  pp. 60 ff. Crossref logo
Tantucci, Vittorio & Aiqing Wang
2020. Diachronic change of rapport orientation and sentence-periphery in Mandarin. Discourse Studies 22:2  pp. 146 ff. Crossref logo
Tantucci, Vittorio & Aiqing Wang
2021. Resonance as an Applied Predictor of Cross-Cultural Interaction: Constructional Priming in Mandarin and American English Interaction. Applied Linguistics Crossref logo
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2015. Investigating “periphery” from a functionalist perspective. Linguistics Vanguard 1:1  pp. 119 ff. Crossref logo
Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen & Willem B. Hollmann
2019.  In Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax, Crossref logo
Zhan, Fangqiong, Yue Zhang & Haiping Long
2021. Origin of Modern Chinese pragmatic markers bushi: Negative copula or negative adjective?. Lingua 250  pp. 102922 ff. Crossref logo
Ziegeler, Debra, Eric Mélac & Volker Gast
2019. The rise of right periphery either in English. Language Sciences 75  pp. 15 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.