How to do things with glosses
Illocutionary forces in the margins of medieval manuscripts
Markus Schiegg | University of Bristol
This paper provides a novel view on marginalia from the perspective of linguistic pragmatics. It is based on the observation that existing studies often exclude entries in medieval manuscripts that do not comment on the text directly. Many of them, however, are crucial for understanding what medieval monks did when they studied manuscripts. Searle’s (1969) Speech Act Theory, his typology of illocutionary forces, offers a suitable framework for the systematic analysis of the different kinds of manuscript entries and to reconstruct the intellectual contexts of medieval glossing. We can see that in addition to assertives (i.e., glosses that provide further information on a specific text passage) expressives, directives, commissives and declaratives can also be identified in the margins of medieval manuscripts. Sometimes, even the perlocution of marginalia, their effect on medieval readers, can be traced today.
Keywords: vernacular, glosses, manuscript studies, marginalia, medieval studies, speech act theory
Published online: 16 June 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.17.1.03sch
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.17.1.03sch
References
Arnovick, Leslie K
Austin, John L
Bergmann, Rolf
Bischoff, Bernhard
Bischoff, Bernhard and Michael Lapidge
Boyd, William J.P
Braune, Wilhelm and Ingo Reiffenstein
Brown, Michelle
Budny, Mildred
Bühler, Karl
Cook, Albert S
Derolez, René
Duft, Johannes
Ebel, Friedrich
Eisenhut, Heidi
2007 Die Glossen Ekkeharts IV. im Codex Sangallensis 621. Edition. http://orosius.monumenta.ch/ (accessed 3 November 2015).
Ernst, Oliver
Gameson, Richard
Glaser, Elvira
Glauche, Günter
Haeseli, Christa M
Hehle, Christine
Hellgardt, Ernst
Henkel, Nikolaus
Jacobs, Andreas and Andreas H. Jucker
Kleiber, Wolfgang
Korhammer, Michael
Lehmann, Paul
Lendinara, Patrizia
Lowe, Elias A
McKitterick, Rosamond
Moessner, Lilo
Moulin, Claudine
Nagucka, Ruta
O’Neill, Patrick
O’Sullivan, Sinéad
van Renswoude, Irene and Evina Steinová
In print. “The Annotated Gottschalk: Symbolic Annotation and Control of Heterodoxy in the Carolingian Age.”
Robinson, Fred C
Rousseau, André
Rusche, Philip G
Sauer, Hans
Schaab, Rupert
Schiegg, Markus
2013b “Teleologische Perspektiven auf die althochdeutsche Überlieferung und ihre Konsequenzen für den Quellenwert von Glossen”. JournaLIPP 21: 49–67. Available online at: http://lipp.ub.lmu.de/issue/view/15 (accessed 3 November 2015).
Schipper, William
Schlieben-Lange, Brigitte
Schmid, Hans U
Schwarz, Alexander
Searle, John R
Staffeldt, Sven
Stork, Nancy P
Stricker, Stefanie
Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker
Wallis, Christine
Wieland, Gernot R