Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 17:1 (2016) ► pp.79–106

Para colmo, scalar operator and additive connector

Keys to an evolving process

 | Universidad de Sevilla, Spain
This study addresses the development undergone by para colmo, a form which is in the process of becoming fixed as an argumentative operator and additive connector. Para colmo has undergone a process of subjectification (Traugott 1995a), which is crucial in the development of discourse markers, where the presence of the speaker is manifested in various ways to cover important areas of meaning in the interpretation of the discourse. It has polarized its meaning in the negative and has progressed to indicate scalar saturation, or a position at the highest level of the argumentative scale, with an evaluation of excess on the part of the speaker. The study has been carried out on the basis of both diachronic and synchronic corpora compiled by the Real Academia Española, and covers the period from 1200 to 2004.
Keywords: argumentation, subjectification, discourse marker, grammaticalization, pragmatics
Published online: 16 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.17.1.04rod
References (87)
Abraham, Werner (ed.). 1991. Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alarcos, Emilio. 1973. “Aditamento, adverbio y cuestiones conexas” [“Adjunct, Adverb and Related Aspects”]. In Emilio Alarcos (ed.), Estudios de gramática funcional del español [Studies in Spanish Functional Grammar], 219–53. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Anscombre, Jean C. and Oswald Ducrot. 1983. L’argumentation dans la langue [Argumentation in Language]. Liège: Pierre Mardaga.Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla. 2006. “Discourse Markers in Italian: Towards a ‘Compositional’ Meaning”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 449–64. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Discourse Markers”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 285–314. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio. 1998. El español coloquial en la conversación. [Colloquial Spanish in Conversation]. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia and Leslie Arnovick. 2010. “Pragmaticalisation and Discursisation”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 165–92. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Company, Concepción. 2004a. “Gramaticalización por subjetivización como prescindibilidad de la sintaxis” [“Gramaticalization by Subjetification as Dispensability of Syntax”]. Nueva Revista Filología Hispánica 52 (1): 1–27.Google Scholar
. 2004b. “¿Gramaticalización o desgramaticalización? Reanálisis y subjetivización de verbos como marcadores discursivos en la historia del español” [“Grammaticalization or degrammaticalization? Reanaysis and subjectification of verbs as discourse markers in the history of Spanish”]. Revista de Filología Española 84 (1): 29–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Zero in Syntax, Ten in Pragmatics: Subjectification as Syntactic Cancellation”. In Angeliki Athanasiadou, Costas Canalis and Bert Cornillie (eds), Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity, 375–97. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. “Pragmaticalization (Defined) as Grammaticalization of Discourse Functions”. Linguistics 49 (2): 365–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar II: Complex and Derived Constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dostie, Gaetane. 2004. Pragmaticalisation et marqueurs discursifs [Pragmaticalization and Discourse Markers]. Bruxelles: De Boeck-Duculot. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1980. Les mots du discours [Discourse Words]. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
. 1984. El decir y lo dicho [The Act of Saying and What’s Said]. Buenos Aires: Hachette.Google Scholar
. 1995. “Les modificateurs déréalisants” [“Derealizer Modifiers”]. Journal of Pragmatics 24 (1–2): 145–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, Britt and Ulla-Britt Kotsinas. 1993. “Pragmaticalization: The Case of ba’ and you know ”. Studies I modern sprakvetenskap [Studies in Modern Linguistics] NS 101, 79–93. Stockholm: Amsqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1975a. “Pragmatic Scales and Logical Structure”. Linguistic Inquiry 6 (3): 353–75.Google Scholar
. 1975b. “Polarity and the Scale Principle”. In Robin E. Grossman, L. James San and Timothy J. Vance (eds), Papers from the Eleventh Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 188–99. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Angela. 1995. Connessioni. Uno studio integrato della subordinazione avverbiale [Linking: An Integrated Study of Adverbials]. Genève: Slatkine.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin (ed.). 2006. Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frank-Job, Barbara. 2006. “A Dynamic-interactional Approach to Discourse Markers”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 359–74. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1990. “An Approach to Discourse Markers”. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (3): 383–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. “Pragmatic Markers”. Pragmatics 6 (2): 167–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “What are Discourse Markers?” Journal of Pragmatics 31 (7): 931–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Towards a Theory of Discourse Markers”. In Kerstin Fischer (eds), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 189–204. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Topic Orientation Markers”. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (5): 892–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina. 1987. Enlaces extraoracionales [Extra-sentential Linking Devices]. Sevilla: Alfar.Google Scholar
. 1991. “Adverbios de modalidad” [“Modal adverbs”]. Verba 181: 275–321.Google Scholar
. 1996a. La sintaxis de los relacionantes supraoracionales [The Syntax of Discourse Markers]. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
. 1996b. Ejercicios de sintaxis supraoracional. [Extraclausal Syntax Exercises]. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
. 2000. Lingüística pragmática y Análisis del discurso [Pragmatic Linguistics and Discourse Analysis]. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Operador/ conector, un criterio para la sintaxis discursiva” [“Operator/connector, a discourse syntax distinction”]. Rilce 19 (1): 61–85.Google Scholar
. 2009. Diccionario de conectores y operadores del español [Dictionary of Spanish Connectors and Operators]. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
. 2012a. “Sobre la gramaticalización de los operadores discursivos, como no podía ser de otra manera” [“On the grammaticalization of discourse operators, como no podía ser de otra manera”]. Lingüística Española Actual 34 (1): 27–58.Google Scholar
. 2012b. “El margen derecho del enunciado” [“Sentential right margin”]. Revista Española de Lingüística 42 (2): 63–93.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Marcadores argumentativos escalares y gramaticalización” [“Scalar argumentative markers and grammaticalization”]. In Inés Olza and Elvira Manero Richard (eds), Fraseopragmática, 263–301. Place: Frank and Timme.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Comment Clauses and the Emergence of New Discourse Markers: Spanish lo que es más ”. Journal of Pragmatics 61 (1): 103–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina and Esperanza Alcaide Lara. 2002. Mecanismos lingüísticos de la persuasión [Linguistic Devices of Persuasion]. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Galán, Carmen. 1999. “La subordinación causal y final” [“Causal and final subordination”]. In Ignacio Bosque-Violeta Demonte (ed.), Gramática descriptiva de la Lengua Española [Descriptive Grammar of Spanish Language], 3597–642. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Garcés, María Pilar (ed.). 2008. Diccionario histórico: nuevas perspectivas lingüísticas [Historical Dictionary: New Linguistic Approaches]. Madrid: Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
García Negroni, María Marta. 2003. Gradualité et réinterpretation [ Graduality and Reinterpretation ]. Paris: L´Harmattan.Google Scholar
Girón, José Luis. 2008. “Lexicalización y gramaticalización en la creación de marcadores del discurso… y de otras palabras” [“Lexicalization and grammaticalization in the creation of discourse markers... and other words”]. In Elisabeth Star, Roland Schmidt-Riese and Eva Stoll (eds), Romanische Syntax im Wandel [Romance Syntax in Change], 363–85. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney. 1969. Studies in English Adverbial Usage. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Ordóñez, Salvador. 1997. “La determinación de los niveles oracionales” [“Determining Levels of Sentence Structure”]. In Salvador Gutiérrez (ed.), La oración y sus funciones [The Sentence and its Functions], 368–426. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1979. “Modes of Meaning and Modes of Expression: Types of Grammatical Structures and their Determination by Different Semantic Functions”. In David J. Allerton, Edward Carney and David Holdcroft (eds), Function and Context in Linguistic Analysis: A Fetschrift for William Haas, 57–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. “On some principles of Grammaticization”. In Elizabeth C. Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Second edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 1984. “Toward a new Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-based and R-based implicature”. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Application, 11–42. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 1997. “The Discourse Marker well in the History of English”. English Language and Linguistics 1 (1): 91–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. “Discourse Markers in Early Modern English”. In Richard J. Watts and Peter Trudgill (eds), Alternative Histories of English, 210–30. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. and Yael Ziv (eds). 1998. Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kovacci, Ofelia. 1992. El comentario gramatical [ The Grammatical Commentary ]. Madrid. Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1985. “Grammaticalization: Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change”. Lingua e Stile 20 (3): 303–18.Google Scholar
. 2002. “New Reflections on Grammaticalization and Lexicalization”. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele M. Diewald (eds), New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Diana M. 2006. “Discourse Markers in English: A Discourse–Pragmatic View”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 43–59. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Loureda, Oscar and Esperanza Acín (eds). 2010. Los estudios sobre marcadores del discurso en español, hoy [Current Studies about Discourse Markers]. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Lo Cascio, Vicenzo. 1998. Gramática de la argumentación [The Grammar of Argumentation]. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
López Couso, María J. 2010. “Subjectification and Intersubjectification”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 127–63. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Martín Zorraquino, María Antonia and José Portolés. 1999. “Los marcadores del discurso” [“Discourse markers”]. In Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte (eds), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española [Descriptive Grammar of Spanish Language], 4051–213. Madrid: Espasa,Google Scholar
Montolío, Estrella. 2000. Manual de escritura académica [Manual of Academic Writing]. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Remarks on Layering in a Cognitive–Functional Language Production Mode”. In J. Lachlan Mackenzie and M. Ángeles Gómez González (eds), A New Architecture for Functional Grammar, 275–98. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pons, Salvador. 1998. Conexión y conectores [Connexion and Connectors]. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.Google Scholar
Pons, Salvador and Leonor Ruiz. 2001. “Los orígenes del conector de todas maneras: fijación formal y pragmática” [“The origins of de todas maneras: the formation of a formal fixed expression and pragmatics”]. Revista Filología Española LXXXI (3–4): 317–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pons, Salvador and Scott Schwenter. 2005. “Polar Meaning and ‘Expletive’ Negation in Approximative Adverbs: Spanish por poco (no) ”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 6 (2): 262–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portolés, José. 1998a. Marcadores del discurso [Discourse Markers]. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
. 1998b. “El concepto de suficiencia argumentativa” [“The Concept of Argumentative Sufficiency”]. Signo y seña 91: 199–224.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Escalas informativas aditivas: pruebas del español” [“Additive Informative Scales: Arguments in Spanish”]. Spanish in Context 4 (2): 135–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. 1972. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Second edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española. 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española [A New Grammar of the Spanish Language]. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Reyes, Graciela. 1990. La pragmática lingüística [Linguistic Pragmatics]. Barcelona: Montesinos.Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1970. “On Declarative Sentences”. In Roderick A. Jacobs and Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 222–77. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Company.Google Scholar
Ruiz, Leonor and Salvador Pons. 1995. “Escalas argumentativas y escalas pragmáticas” [“Argumentative Scales and Pragmatic Scales”]. Español Actual 641: 53–74.Google Scholar
Stein, Dieter. 1995. “Subjective Meanings and the History of Inversions in English”. In Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds), Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, 128–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1989. “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change”. Language 65 (1): 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995a. “Subjectification in Grammaticalization”. In Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds), Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995b. “The Role of the Development of Discourse Markers in a Theory of Grammaticalization”. Paper presented at ICHL XII, Manchester. Available online at: [URL] (accessed 10 June 2014).
. 2010. “Grammaticalization”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 97–126. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina & Víctor Pérez Béjar
2023.  Que conste/sepas and como si constructions in Spanish. In Constructions in Spanish [Constructional Approaches to Language, 34], ► pp. 224 ff. DOI logo
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina
2019. Combinaciones entre operadores argumentativos. Spanish in Context 16:2 ► pp. 151 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.