Article published in:
Periphery – Diachronic and Cross-Linguistic Approaches
Edited by Yuko Higashiizumi, Noriko O. Onodera and Sung-Ock S. Sohn
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2] 2016
► pp. 163–177

Periphery

Diachronic and cross-linguistic approaches

| Aoyama Gakuin University
| Stanford University
Keywords: grammaticalization, exchange-structure, interaction, action-structure, universals, periphery
Published online: 06 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.17.2.01ono
References
Beeching, Kate and Ulrich Detges
(eds) 2014a Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2014b “Introduction”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 1–23. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Briz Goméz, AntonioGrupo Val.Es.Co
and 2003 “Un sistema de unidades para el estudio del lenguaje colloquial” [A System of Units for the Study of Spoken Language]. Oralia 61: 7–61.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J
1996 Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson
1987 [1978] Politeness: Some Universals of Human Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo and Luigi Rizzi
2008 “The Cartography of Syntactic Structures”. Studies in Linguistics 21 (CISCL Working Papers, Siena, Italy): 42–58.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth
2014 “ ‘So Very Fast Then’ Discourse Markers at Left and Right Periphery in Spoken French”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Langue Change, 151–78. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth and Benjamin Fagard
2011 “ Alors between Discourse and Grammar: The Role of Syntactic Position”. Functions of Language 18 (1): 29–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Detges, Ulrich and Richard Waltereit
2014 “ Moi je ne sais pas vs. Je ne sais pas moi: French Disjoint Pronouns in the Left vs. Right Periphery”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 24–46. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald
1984 Le dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Endo, Yoshio
2014 Nihongo Cartography Josetsu [Introduction to the Cartography of Japanese Syntactic Structures]. Tokyo: Hituzi Shoboo.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J
2013 Relationship Thinking: Agency, Enchrony and Human Sociality. New York: Oxford University. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
(ed.) 2006 Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1988 “Types of English Discourse Markers”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 38 (1): 19–33.Google Scholar
2009 “An Approach to Discourse Markers”. International Review of Pragmatics 11: 293–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert P
1975 “Logic and Conversation”. In Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan (eds), Speech Acts (Syntax and Semantics, Volume 31), 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J
1987 “Emergent Grammar”. In Jon Aske, Natasha Berry, Laura Michaelis and Hana Filip (eds), Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: General Session and Parasession on Grammar and Cognition, 139–57. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003 Grammaticalization. (Second revised edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence R
1984 “Toward a New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-Based and R-Based Implicature”. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications; Georgetown University Round Table ’84, 11–42. Washington, District of Columbia: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H
(ed.) 1995 Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Rudi
1994 On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. Trans. by Brigitte Nerlich. (First published in German in 1990.) London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kinsui, Satoshi
2005 “Nihongo keigo no bunpooka to imi henka” [The Grammaticalization and Semantic Change of Honorifics in Japanese]. Nihongo no Kenkyuu [Study of Japanese Language] 1 (3): 18–31.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moriyama, Yukiko
2004 “Kenjoogo kara mita keigoshi, teineigo kara mita keigoshi” [History of Honorifics from the Viewpoints of Humble Forms and Polite Forms]. In Yasuto Kikuchi (ed.), Keigo [Honorifics] (Asakura Nihongo Kooza 8), 200–224. Tokyo: Asakura.Google Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O
2004 Japanese Discourse Markers: Synchronic and Diachronic Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Setting Up a Mental Space: A Function of Discourse Markers at the Left Periphery (LP) and Some Observations about LP and RP in Japanese”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 92–116. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O. and Ryoko Suzuki
(eds) 2007 Historical Changes in Japanese: Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity. (Special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics) 8 (2).Google Scholar
Ricca, Davide and Jacqueline Visconti
2011 “Left Periphery and Semantic Change: On the Development of the Italian Expressions of Trufulness Invero, Davvero, Veramente”. Paper presented at IPrA 12 . 3–8 July. Manchester: University of Manchester.
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery”. In Liane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar, 281–338. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2004 The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roulet, Eddy
1984 “Speech Acts, Discourse Structure, and Pragmatic Connectives”. Journal of Pragmatics 8 (1): 31–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation”. Language 50 (4i): 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1978 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking in Conversation”. In Jim Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, 1–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A
2000 “Viewpoints and Polysemy: Linking Adversative and Causal Meanings of Discourse Markers”. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Bernd Kortmann (eds), Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, 257–81. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shinzato, Rumiko
2007 “(Inter)subjectification, Japanese Syntax and Syntactic Scope Increase”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (special issue of Historical Changes in Japanese – Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity, edited by Noriko O. Onodera and Ryoko Suzuki) 8 (2): 171–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A
2014 “Obsolescence and Innovation in Discourse-Pragmatic Change: The View from Canada”. Paper presented at Discourse-Variation and Change (DiPVaC) 2 . 7–9 April. Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Thompson, Sandra A. and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2005 “The Clause as a Locus of Grammar and Interaction”. Discourse Studies 7 (4/5): 481–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2010 “(Inter)subjectivity and (Inter)subjectification: A Reassessment”. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens (eds), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “On the Function of the Epistemic Adverbs Surely and No Doubt at the Left and Right Peripheries of the Clause”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 72–91. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale
(eds) 2010 Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Ying Yang and Tak-Sum Wong
2014 “On the Development of Sentence Final Articles (and Utterance Tags) in Chinese”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 179–220. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Chen, Jiajun
2018. (Inter)subjectification at the left and right periphery: Deriving Chinese pragmatic marker bushi from the negative copula. Language Sciences 66 ► pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Degand, Liesbeth & Ludivine Crible
2021.  In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 19 ff. Crossref logo
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2020. American and Irish English speakers’ perceptions of the final particlessoandbut. World Englishes Crossref logo
Koops, Christian & Arne Lohmann
2022. Explaining reversible discourse marker sequences: A case study of and and so. Journal of Pragmatics 191 ► pp. 156 ff. Crossref logo
Salameh Jiménez, Shima, María Estellés & Salvador Pons Bordería
2018.  In Positioning the Self and Others [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 292], ► pp. 105 ff. Crossref logo
Scivoletto, Giulio
2020. Semasiological cyclicity in the evolution of discourse markers. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:2 ► pp. 236 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.