Article published in:
Periphery – Diachronic and Cross-Linguistic Approaches
Edited by Yuko Higashiizumi, Noriko O. Onodera and Sung-Ock S. Sohn
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2] 2016
► pp. 178–207

Chinese interrogative particles as talk coordinators at the right periphery

A discourse–pragmatic perspective

| Hong Kong Babtist University
| Hong Kong Polytechnic University
| City University of Hong Kong
This paper examines how utterance-final interrogative particles in Chinese contribute to the management of local and global coherence in conversational discourse. Using Schiffrin’s (1987) model of discourse coherence, and focusing in particular on the Cantonese particle ho2 we show how an interrogative particle is often also used as an interactional particle. In the case of ho2, we show how this information-seeking particle is frequently recruited as an affirmation-seeking and solidarity-enhancing device. Special attention is given to the extended uses of ho2 in terms of Schiffrin’s exchange and action structures, as well as participation frameworks and information states. Our analysis highlights how speakers effectively use utterance particles as exemplified by ho2 to convey their (inter)subjective footing and in the process negotiate meaningful affiliative/disaffiliative interaction among interlocutors, and thereby achieve discourse coherence for effective communication.
Keywords: Cantonese ho2, common ground marker, affirmation marker, interactional particles, discourse coherence model, interrogative particles
Published online: 06 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.17.2.02cho
References
Aijmer, Karin
2002 English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth Latimore
1970 Cantonese: Basic Course. Washington, District of Columbia: US Govt Printing Office.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren
1968 A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cheung, Hung-nin S
2007 A Grammar of Cantonese as Spoken in Hong Kong. (Revised edition.) Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Bert Cornillie and Paola Pietrandrea
(eds) 2013 Discourse Markers and Modal particles: Categorization and Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1992 “Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis”. Discourse and Society 3 (2): 193–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fāng, Xia˘oyàn
2004 Guǎngzhōu Fāngyán Jùmò Yǔqì Zhùcí [Sentence-final Mood Particles in Guangzhou Dialect]. Canton: Jinan University Press.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2014 “I think, I mean and I believe in Political Discourse: Collocates, Functions and Distribution”. Functions of Language 21 (1): 67–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
2006 Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michael
1972 The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. (Translated by Allan Sheridan.) New York: Harper Colophon Books.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1988 “Types of English Discourse Markers”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 38 (1–4): 19–33.Google Scholar
1996 “Pragmatic markers”. Pragmatics 6 (2): 167–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “An Account of Discourse Markers”. International Review of Pragmatics 1 (2): 293–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Juila A
1980 Discourse Particles: An Analysis of the Role of y’know, I mean, well, and actually in Conversation. PhD thesis. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Hansen and Maj-Britt Mosegaard
1998 The Function of Discourse Particles: A Study with Special Reference to Spoken Standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1989 “Current Developments in Conversation Analysis”. In Derek Roger and Peter Bull (eds), Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, 21–47. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kuong, Joaquim
2008 “Yes/no Question Particles Revisited: The Grammatical Functions of mo4, me1, and maa3 ”. In Marjorie K.M. Chan and Hana Kang (eds), Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-20), 715–33. Columbus. Distributed by The Ohio State University. Accessed 17 June 2015 at: https://​naccl​.osu​.edu​/naccl​-20​/proceedings.Google Scholar
Kwok, Helen
1984 Sentence Particles in Cantonese. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Lam, Zoe Wai-Man
2014 “A Complex ForceP for Speaker-and Addressee-oriented Discourse Particles in Cantonese”. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 35 (2): 61–80.Google Scholar
Law, Sum-Po
1990 The Syntax and Phonology of Cantonese Sentence-Final Particles. PhD thesis. Boston University.Google Scholar
Leung, Chung-Sum
2005 A Study of the Utterance Particles in Cantonese as Spoken in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Language Information Sciences Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Leung, Wai-mun
2006 On the Synchrony and Diachrony of Sentence Final Particles: The Case of wo in Cantonese. PhD thesis. University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Li, Boya
2006 Chinese Final Particles and the Syntax of the Periphery. PhD thesis. (LOT dissertation series.) Leiden Univeristy, Netherlands. Accessed 16 June 2015 at: https://​openaccess​.leidenuniv​.nl​/bitstream​/handle​/1887​/4393​/Thesis​.pdf​?sequence​=1.Google Scholar
Li, Charles and Sandra Thompson
1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lī, Xīnkúi, Jiājiào Huáng, Qíshēng Shī, Yún Mài and Dìngfāng Chén
1995 Guǎngzhōu Fāngyán Yánjīu [A Study in Cantonese]. Canton: Guangdong People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Luke, Kang-Kwong
1988 A Conversation Analytic Approach to the Study of Utterance Particles in Cantonese. PhD thesis. University of York.Google Scholar
1990 Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mài, Yún and Bùyún Tán
1997 Shíyòng Guǎngzhōuhuà Fēnlèi Cídiǎn [A Practical Thesaurus of Cantonese]. Canton: Guangdong People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen and Virginia Yip
1994 Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola
1982 “The Symbolic Relationship between Pragmatic Particles and Impromptu Speech”. In Nils Erik Enkvist (ed.), Impromptu Speech: A Symposium, 147–77. Åbo: Åbo Akademi.Google Scholar
Péng, Xiǎocūn
2010 Guǎngzhōuhuà Zhùcí Yánjiū [A Study of the Particles in Cantonese]. Canton: Jinan University Press.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1982 “Ethnic Style in Male/Female Conversation”. In John Gumperz (ed.), Language and Social Identity, 217–231. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence C
1983 Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. PhD thesis. (Ohio State Working Papers in Linguistics 28.) Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Searle, John R
1991 [1975] “Indirect Speech Acts”. In S. Davis (ed.), Pragmatics: A Reader, 265–77. First published in Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, 59–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint and Boya Li
2007 “The Dissection and Structural Mapping of Cantonese Sentence Final Particles”. Lingua 117 (10): 1739–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Hok-Yuen O., Ming-San C. Tse and Yam-Leung L. Cheung
2013 “Two ‘Ho2’ in Cantonese, ho2?”. Paper presented at Annual Research Forum of Linguistic Society of Hong Kong 2013 . 30 November. Hong Kong.
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina
1997 “Transforming Participation Frameworks in Multi-Party Mandarin Conversation: The Use of Discourse Particles and Body Behavior”. Issues in Applied Linguistics 8 (2): 97–117.Google Scholar
2003 Stance in Talk: A Conversation Analysis of Mandarin Final Particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yau, Shun-chiu
1980 “Sentential Connotations in Cantonese”. Fāngyán 11: 35–52.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Chen, Jiajun
2018. (Inter)subjectification at the left and right periphery: Deriving Chinese pragmatic marker bushi from the negative copula. Language Sciences 66 ► pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Chor, Winnie
2018. Sentence final particles as epistemic modulators in Cantonese conversations: A discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 129 ► pp. 34 ff. Crossref logo
Higashiizumi, Yuko
2016. The development of confirmation/agreement markers away from the RP in Japanese. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 282 ff. Crossref logo
Tang, Sze-Wing
2020. Cartographic syntax of performative projections: evidence from Cantonese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Wakefield, John C.
2020. The Syntax and Semantics of Cantonese Particles in the Left Periphery. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 41:2 ► pp. 109 ff. Crossref logo
Yiu, Carine Yuk-man
2021. The origin and development of the question particle me1 in Cantonese. Lingua 254 ► pp. 103049 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.