Article published In:
Periphery – Diachronic and Cross-Linguistic Approaches
Edited by Yuko Higashiizumi, Noriko O. Onodera and Sung-Ock S. Sohn
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2] 2016
► pp. 231254
References (36)
References
An, Cwu-Ho. 2000. “‘Kule’ kyeyel cepsoksa-ui hyengseng kwaceng-kwa mwunpephwa” [The formation process and grammaticalization of ‘kule’ connectives]. Kukehak [Korean Language Studies] 351: 113–141.Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate and Ulrich Detges (eds). 2014. Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul and David Weenink. 2010. Praat 5.2.06. University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cha. 2010. Interaction of Prosody and Discourse Function”. Korean Discourse Marker mwe in the Sentence-Final Position”. Language Facts and Perspectives 251: 227–56.Google Scholar
Choi, Jane. 2007. A Corpus-based Discourse Analysis of Korean Discourse Markers: An Analysis of Spoken and Written Use. PhD thesis. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Han, Na-Rae, David Graff and Myeonchul Kim. 2003. Korean Telephone Conversations Lexicon. Linguistic Data Consortium: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. “A Change-of-state Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement”. In J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds), Structures of Social Action, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Oh-prefaced Responses to Inquiry”. Language in Society 271: 291–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1987. “Emergent Grammar”. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 139–157. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Hopper, Paul and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huh, Woong. 1991. 15–16 Seyki wuli yeysmalpon-uy yeksa [An Overview of Korean Grammar in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Texts]. Seoul, Korea: Thap Press.Google Scholar
Jeon, Young-ok and Killim Nam. 2005. “Kwuewa mwuneuy cepsok phyohyen pikyo yenkwu: “Kulentey, -nuntey” lul cwungsimulo” [A Comparative Study of Conjunctions in Spoken and Written Korean: Focusing on “kulentey, –nuntey”]. Hanmalyenkwu [Korean Studies] 171: 169–194.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah. 2007. “The Intermediate Phrase in Korean Intonation: Evidence from Sentence Processing”. In Carlos Gussenhoven and Tomas Riad (eds), Tones and Tunes: Studies in Word and Sentence Prosody, 143–167. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Stephanie Hyeri and Sung-Ock Sohn. 2015. “Grammar as an Emergent Response to Interactional Needs: A Study of Final kuntey ‘but’ in Korean Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics 831: 73–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Uy-Do. 1990. Wulimal iumssikkuthuy thongsicek yenkwu [A Diachronic Study of Connective Suffixes in Korean]. Seoul: Emwunkak.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian.1995. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Lincom Europe.Google Scholar
Mulder, Jean and Sandy A. Thompson. 2008. “The Grammaticalization of but as a Final Particle in Conversation”. In Ritva Laury (ed.), Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions, 179–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O. 2004. Japanese Discourse Markers: Synchronic and Diachronic Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Kun-Young. 2001. Hankwuke cisi tayyongeuy mwunpephwa [Grammaticalization of Korean Substitutes]. Unpublished PhD thesis. Hankwuk University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Park, Yong-Yae. 1998. “A Discourse Analysis of Contrastive Connectives in English, Korean, and Japanese Conversation: with Special Reference to the Context of Dispreferred Responses”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Yael Ziv (eds), Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, 227–299. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “The Korean Connective nuntey in Conversational Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics 311: 191–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rhee, Seongha. 2016. “LP and RP in grammaticalization of discourse markers from ‘what’ in Korean”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17 (2): 255–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation”. Language 50 (4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1988. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sejong Corpus. 2010. 21st Century Sejong Project. The National Institute of the Korean Language.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min. 1999. The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sohn, Sung-Ock and Stephanie Hyeri Kim. 2014. “The Interplay of Discourse and Prosody at the Left and Right Periphery in Korean: An Analysis of kuntey ‘but’”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 221–249. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sohn, Sung-Ock. 2006. “Frequency effects in grammaticalization: from Relative Clause to Clause Connective in Korean”. In Naomi McGloin and Junki Mori (eds), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Volume 151, 184–195. Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2011. “‘He withdrew, disconcerted and offended, no doubt; but surely it was not my fault’: On the Function of Adverbs of Certainty at the Left and Right Peripheries of Clause”. Paper presented at IPrA-12 Conference . 3–8 July. Manchester, UK.
. 2013. “Remark on the Panel of Form–Function Periphery Structure: Focus on Exchange Structure and Action structure”. Paper presented at the IPra-13 . September. New Delhi.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Myonghui, 1996. Hyentaykwuke tayyongeey tayhan yenkwu [The Study on Korean Referential Terms in Contemporary Korean]. PhD thesis. Seoul National University.Google Scholar
Yeon, Jaehoon and Lucien Brown. 2011. Korean: A Comprehensive Grammar. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Rhee, Seongha & Hyun Jung Koo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.