Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 23:2 (2022) ► pp.245–284

A constructional account of the development of the Chinese stance discourse marker běnlái

ORCID logo | Nanyang Technological University National Institute of Education
This paper examines the emergence of the Chinese adverb běnlái and its further development into a stance discourse marker (sdm). Most previous studies consider the epistemic modal adverb běnlái (‘indeed, truly’) to have originated from the temporal adverb běnlái (‘originally’). Based on the framework of constructionalisation (Traugott and Trousdale 2013) and Van de Velde et al.’s (2013) idea of multiple sources, I argue that the temporal adverb might not have been the only source for the modal běnlái to occur. Furthermore, the modal adverb changed into an sdm, thereby signaling the speaker’s subjective evaluation while linking the coherence of the discourse. I argue that the change was enabled by both subjectification and analogisation. The exemplars to which běnlái was by hypothesis analogised include the extant discourse connectives (e.g., kěshì) and the extant commentary pragmatic markers (e.g., kělián and suǒxìng) (Fraser 2009).
Keywords: analogisation, commentary pragmatic marker, constructionalisation, discourse connectives, multiple sources, stance discourse marker, subjectification
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Some basic concepts of the framework
    • 2.1Constructionalisation and constructional changes
    • 2.2Diachronic pragmatics
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4. Běnlái in Modern Chinese
  • 5. Běnlái in the history of Chinese
    • 5.1 Běn and lái in Old Chinese
    • 5.2The development of běnlái
  • 6.The constructional account of the development of běnlái
    • 6.1Subjectification
    • 6.2Analogisation
      • 6.2.1The extant discourse connectives
      • 6.2.2The extant commentary pragmatic markers
    • 6.3The constructional network of the stance discourse marker
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 11 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.19008.zha
References (65)
References
Andersen, Henning. 2001. “Actualization and the (Uni)Directionality”. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progress, 225–248. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barcelona Sanchez, Antonio (ed.). 2000. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea (eds). 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate and Ulrich Detges (eds). 2014. Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2004. “Historical Patterns for the Grammatical Marking of Stance: A Cross-register Comparison”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5 (1): 107–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Edward Finegan. 1988. “Adverbial Stance Types in English”. Discourse Processes 111: 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Nigel Vincent and George Walkden. 2015. “On Constructing a Theory of Grammatical Change”. Transactions of the Philological Society 113 (3): 363–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 2013. “Usage-based Theory and Exemplar Representation”. In Thomas Hoffman and Graeme Trousdale (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 49–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. and William Pagliuca. 1987. “The Evolution of Future Meaning”. In Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba and Giuliano Bernini (eds), Papers from the VIIth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 109–122. 9–13 September 1985. Pavia, Italy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Changlai. 2013. “Jinran lei shuangyinci yanhua de xitongxing jiqi xiangguan wenti” [‘The Systematicity of the Development of the Disyllabic Temporal Words like jinlai and its Related Issues’]. Journal of Shanghai Normal University 42 (5): 99–110.Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan and Douglas Biber. 2000. “Adverbial Marking of Stance in Speech and Writing”. In Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, 56–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth and Benjamin Fagard. 2011. “Alors Between Discourse and Grammar: The Role of Syntactic Position”. Functions of Language 18 (1): 29–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth and Richard Waltereit. 2014. “Moi je ne sais pas vs. Je ne sais pas moi: French Disjoint Pronouns in the Left vs. Right Periphery”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 24–46. Brill: Leiden.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. “The Stance Triangle”. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stance-taking in Discourse, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik. 2016. “How Gradual Change Progresses: The Interaction between Convention and Innovation”. Language Variation and Change 28 (1): 83–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feng, Guangwu. 2008. “Pragmatic Markers in Chinese”. Journal of Pragmatics 401: 1687–1718. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1988. “Types of English Discourse Markers”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 381: 19–33.Google Scholar
. 1996. “Pragmatic Markers”. Pragmatics 6 (2): 167–190.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Towards a Theory of Discourse Markers”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 189–204. North Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
. 2009. “An Account of Discourse Markers”. International Review of Pragmatics 1 (2): 293–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam. 2008. “Constructions and Constructs: Mapping a Shift between Predication and Attribution”. In Alexander Bergs and Gabriele Diewald (eds), Constructions and Language Change, 47–79. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara and Piera Molinelli. 2014. “Italian Guarda, Prego, Dai: Pragmatic markers and the left and right periphery”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 117–150. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. and Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2018. “Three Open Questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar”. In Evie Coussé, Peter Andersson and Joel Olofsson (eds), Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar, 21–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. (Revised edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hüning, Matthias and Geert Booij. 2014. “From Compounding to Derivation: The Rise of Derivational Affixes through Constructionalization”. Folia Linguistica (special issue on Refining Grammaticalization edited by Ferdinand von Mengden and Horst Simon) 48 (2): 579–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi and Foong Ha Yap (eds). 2015. “Stance-Marking and Stance-Taking in Asian Languages”. Journal of Pragmatics (special issue) 83 (1): 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Andreas and Andreas H. Jucker. 1995. “The Historical Perspective in Pragmatics”. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, 3–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. (ed.). 1995. Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2002. “New Reflections on Grammaticalization and Lexicalization”. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds), New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Yuming. 1996. “Feiwei xingrongci de cilei diwei” [‘The Non-predicative Adjectives as a Word Class’]. Chinese Language 11: 1–9.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 1991. “Semantic Change and Heterosemy in Grammaticalization”. Language 67 (3): 475–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang. 1980. Xiandai Hanyu Babaici [‘ 800 words in Modern Chinese ’]. Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Luo, Zhufeng. 1993. Hanyu da Cidian [‘ The Dictionary of Chinese ’]. Beijing: Hanyu da cidian chubanshe.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1958 [1912]. “L’évolution des formes grammaticales” [‘The Evolution of Grammatical Forms’]. In Antoine Meillet (ed.), Linguistique historique et linguistique générale [‘ Historical Linguistics and General Linguistics ’], 130–148. Paris: Champion. (Originally published in Scientia (Rivista di scienza) XXII, 1912).Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 2001. “Adjectives and Boundedness”. Cognitive Linguistics 12 (1): 47–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petré, Peter. 2014. Constructions and Environments: Copular, Passive, and Related Constructions in Old and Middle English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1991. “The Generative Lexicon”. Computational Linguistics 17 (4): 409–441.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smirnova, Elena. 2015. “Constructionalization and Constructional Change: The Role of Context in the Development of Constructions”. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea (eds), Diachronic Construction Grammar, 81–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Chaofen. 1996. Word-Order Change and Grammaticalization in the History of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tang, Weiqun. 2010. “Fuci ‘benlai’ he ‘benlai’ ju ‘Adverb ‘benlai’ and ‘benlai’ sentences”. Wuhan University Journal (Humanity Sciences) 63 (4): 477–482.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. “Subjectification in Grammaticalization”. In Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds), Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, 31–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Historical Pragmatics”. In Laurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward (eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics, 538–561. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2010. “(Inter)subjectivity and (Inter)subjectification: A Reassessment”. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens (eds), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Intersubjectification and Clause Periphery”. In Lieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière and Freek Van de Velde (eds), Intersections of Intersubjectivity (special issue on English Text Construction ) 51: 7–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “On the Function of the Epistemic Adverbs Surely and No Doubt at the Left and Right Peripheries of the Clause”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 72–91. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
. 2020. “The Development of ‘Digressive’ Discourse-Topic Shift Markers in English”. Journal of Pragmatics 1561: 121–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Ekkehard König. 1991. “The Semantics–Pragmatics of Grammaticalization Revisited”. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization, 189–218. (Volume I1.) Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek, Hendrik De Smet and Lobke Ghesquière. 2013. “On Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change”. Studies in Language 37 (3): 473–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Li. 1988. Hanyu yufa shi [‘ The History of Chinese Grammar ’]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Xing, Fuyi. 2003. Cilei nanbian [‘ Word Classes’ Differentiation ’]. Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Zhan, Fangqiong, Yue Zhang and Haiping Long. 2021. “Origin of Modern Chinese Pragmatic Markers Bushi: Negative Copula or Negative Adjective?” Lingua 2501: 102922. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhan, Fangqiong and Chaofen Sun. 2022. “The Development of the Chinese Discourse Marker and Expressive Wanle ”. Journal of Pragmatics 1891: 37–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhan, Weidong, Rui Guo and Yirong Chen. 2003. The CCL Corpus of Chinese Texts: 700 million Chinese Characters, the 11th Century B.C. – present. Available online at the website of Center for Chinese Linguistics (abbreviated as CCL) at: [URL]
Zhang, Bojiang. 1994. “Cilei huoyong de gongneng jieshi” [‘The Functional Explanation of Flexible Use of Word Classes’]. Chinese Language 51: 339–346.Google Scholar
Zhu, Xinjun. 2008. “‘Benlai’ de yufahua” [‘The Grammaticalization of “benlai”’]. Jiaozuo University Journal 11: 21–23.Google Scholar