Review published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 22:1 (2021) ► pp.153160
References (7)
References
Bergs, Alexander. 2007. “A New Approach to Text Typology”. In Terttu Nevalainen and Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen (eds), Letter Writing, 27–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Edward Finegan. 1997. “Diachronic Relations among Speech-Based and Written Registers in English”. In Terttu Nevalainen and Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds), To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki Vol. LII), 253–275. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Norman (ed.). 1971. Paston Letters and Papers of the Fifteenth Century. (Part I.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony and Andrew Hardie. 2012. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Säily, Tanja, Arja Nurmi, Minna Palander-Collin and Anita Auer (eds). 2017. Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar