Metonymy has been studied for at least two thousand years by rhetoricians, for two hundred years by historical semanticists, and for about ten years by cognitive linguists. However, they all have neglected one peculiar aspect of metonymy: its serial nature. Metonymic chains are either synchronic lexicalised chains, as in the case of paper (material, product, contents) or diachronic chains, as in the case of lavatory (container, room, special room, container). The study of serial metonymy will allow us to challenge some old views on metaphor and metonymy and to probe into the cognitive significance of metonymy. We argue that if one of the cognitive prerequisites of language is the ability to infer the referential intentions of others, serial metonymy can be seen as one of the results of this ability in (linguistic) action.
2017. “The moustache sits down first”: on the acquisition of metonymy. Journal of Child Language 44:1 ► pp. 87 ff.
Zhang, Weiwei, Dirk Geeraerts & Dirk Speelman
2015. Visualizing onomasiological change: Diachronic variation in metonymic patterns for woman in Chinese. Cognitive Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 289 ff.
Jucker, A.H.
2006. Historical Pragmatics. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 329 ff.
Nerlich, B.
2006. Metonymy. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 109 ff.
Verspoor, Marjolijn H. & Ágnes de Bie-Kerékjártó
2006. Colorful bits of experience: FromBluestockingtoblue movie. English Studies 87:1 ► pp. 78 ff.
ZIEGELER, DEBRA
2003. REDEFINING UNIDIRECTIONALITY: INSIGHTS FROM DEMODALISATION. Folia Linguistica Historica 37:Historica vol. 24,1-2
Ziegeler, Debra
2007. A word of caution on coercion. Journal of Pragmatics 39:5 ► pp. 990 ff.
Chamizo Domı́nguez, Pedro J. & Brigitte Nerlich
2002. False friends. Journal of Pragmatics 34:12 ► pp. 1833 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.