Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 24:2 (2023) ► pp.245275
References (71)
References
van der Aa, Abraham Jacob. 1858. Biographisch woordenboek der Nederlanden. Deel 3 [‘ Biographical Dictionary of Dutch. Part 3 ’]. Haarlem: Van Brederode. Available online at: [URL]
Ammann, Andreas. 2007. “The Fate of ‘Redundant’ Verbal Forms: Double Perfect Constructions in the Languages of Europe”. In Thomas Stolz (ed.), Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung [‘ Language Typology and Universals ’], 186–204. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baratta, Alexander M. 2009. “Revealing Stance through Passive Voice”. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (7): 1406–1421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef, Johan van der Auwera, Hans Bennis, Eefje Boef, Gunther de Vogelaer and Margreet van der Ham. 2008. Syntactic Atlas of the Dutch Dialects. (Volume 21.) Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Berkvens-Stevelinck, Christiane. 1989. “Coornhert, een eigenzinnig theoloog” [‘Coornhert, A Self-Willed Theologian’]. In Henk Bonger, J. R. H. Hoogervorst, Nicolette Mout, Ivo Schöffer and Jan Juliaan Woltjer (eds), Dirck Volckertszoon Coornhert. Dwars maar recht [‘ Dirck Volcerktszoon Coornhert: Unruly but Correct ’], 18–31. Zutphen: De Walburg Pers.Google Scholar
Bonger, Hendrik. 1941. Dirck Volckertszoon Coornhert. Studie over een nuchter en vroom Nederlander [‘ Dirck Volckertszoon Coornhert: Study of a Sober and Pious Dutchman ’]. Lochem: De Tijdstroom. Available online at: [URL]
Bonger, Hendrik and Arie-Jan Gelderblom (eds). 1985. Weet of rust. Proza van Coornhert [‘ Know or Let Go: Prose from Coornhert ’]. Amsterdam: Em. Querido’s Uitgeverij.Google Scholar
Bossard, Hans. 1962. Zuger Mundartbuch: Grammatik und Wörterverzeichnisse [‘ Dialect Book of Zug: Grammar and Vocabulary ’]. Zürich: Schweizer Spiegel-Verlag.Google Scholar
Brandner, Ellen, Martin Salzmann and Gerhard Schaden. 2016. “Zur Syntax und Semantik des doppelten Perfekts aus alemannischer Sicht” [‘On the Syntax and Semantics of the Double Perfect from an Alemannic Viewpoint’]. In Alexandra N. Lenz and Franz Patocka (eds), Syntaktische Variation: Areallinguistische Perspektiven [‘ Syntactic Variation: Areal Linguistic Perspectives ’], 13–46. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Vienna University Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1992. “The Historical Present in Charlotte Brontë’s Novels: Some Discourse Functions”. Style 26 (2): 221–244.Google Scholar
2015. “Historical Discourse Analysis”. In Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton and Deborah Schiffrin (eds), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 222–243. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans. 2021. “The Rise of the Periphrastic Perfect Tense in the Continental West Germanic Languages”. In Kristin Melum Eide and Marc Fryd (eds), The Perfect Volume: Papers on the Perfect, 262–289. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brownlees, Nicholas. 2017. “‘He Tells Us That’: Strategies of Reporting Adversarial News in the English Civil War”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18 (2): 235–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buys, Ruben. 2011. Coornhert in het klein. Korte teksten over deugd, onwetendheid en Volmaakbaarheid [‘ Coornhert in Miniature: Short Texts about Virtue, Ignorance, and Perfectibility ’]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 1561. Officia Ciceronis, leerende wat yeghelijck in allen staten behoort te doen, bescreuen int Latijn [‘ Cicero’s De Officis, Teaching What Every One in All States Should Do, Described in Latin ’]. (Translation by Dirk Volkertsz Coornhert.) Haarlem: Jan van Zuren. Available online at: [URL]
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coornhert, Dirk Volkertsz. 1630. Schijndeugd der secten (sds) [‘ Delusional Virtue of Sects ’]. Amsterdam: Jacob Aertsz Colom. Available online at: [URL]
. 1630. Vande predestinatie, verkiesinghe en de verwerpinghe Godes [‘ On Predestination and God’s Preferences and Rejections ’]. Amsterdam: Jacob Aertsz. Colom. Available online at: [URL]
. 1630. “Van de toelatinge ende decrete Godts” [‘On God’s Allowances and Decrees’]. In Dirk Volkertsz Coornhert, Wercken. Deel II [‘ Works. Part II ’]. Amsterdam: Jacob Aertsz. Colom. Available online at: [URL]
. 1630. “Van de vreemde sonde, schulde, straffe nasporinghe” (vdvs) [‘Inquiries On Strange Sin, Guilt, Punishment’]. In Dirk Volkertsz Coornhert, Wercken. Deel II [‘ Works. Part II ’]. Amsterdam: Jacob Aertsz. Colom. Available online at: [URL]
. 1631. “Toetzsteen der ware leeraren” (tdwl) [‘Touchstone of True Teachers’]. In Dirk Volkertsz Coornhert, Wercken. Deel I [‘ Works. Part I ’]. Amsterdam: Jacob Aertsz. Colom. Available online at: [URL]
. c . 1644. Vijftigh lustighe historien oft nieuwigheden Joannis Boccatij (vlho) [‘ Fifty Funny Stories or Curiosities from Giovanni Boccacio ’]. Amsterdam: Broer Jansz. Available online at: [URL]
. 1939 (1561). De dolinge van Ulysse. Homerus’ Odysseia I–XVIII in Nederlandse verzen [‘ The Wanderings of Ulysses: Homer’s Odyssey I–XVIII in Dutch Verse ’]. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Available online at: [URL]
. 1942 (1586). Zedekunst, dat is wellevenskunste (zdiw) [‘ Ethics: The Art of Living Well ’]. (Edited by Bruno B. Becker.) Leiden: E.J. Brill. Available online at: [URL]
. 1945 (1585). Boëthius: Van de vertróósting der wysheyd [‘ Boethius: On the Consolation of Wisdom ’]. Amsterdam: A.A. Balkema. Available online at: [URL]
Coornhert, Dirk Volkertsz. 1955 ( c . 1570–1575). “Der Maeghdekens Schole, comedia” (dmsc) [‘School for Maidens’]. In Dirk Volkertsz Coornhert, Het roerspel en de comedies van Coornhert [‘ The Turbulent Play and the Comedies of Coornhert ’], 318–401. (Edited by Paul van der Meulen.) Leiden: E.J. Brill. Available online at: [URL]
Damsteegt, B. C. 1978. “t’Samenvoeghing in de Hertspiegel” [‘Composition in the Heart-Mirror’]. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 941: 1–24. Available online at: [URL]
Duinhoven, Antonius Maria. 1997. Middel-Nederlandse syntaxis: Synchroon en diachroon 2. De werkwoordgroep [‘ Middle Dutch Syntax: Synchronic and Diachronic 2. The Verb Phrase ’]. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Englebretson, Robert. 2007. Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1985. “Discourse Functions of Tense-Aspect Oppositions in Narrative: Toward a Theory of Grounding”. Linguistics 23 (6): 851–882. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. “Evaluation in Narrative: The Present Tense in Medieval ‘Performed Stories’”. Yale French Studies 701: 199–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. Tense and Narrativity: From Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction. Austin: University of Texas Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleurkens, Anneke C. G. 1989. ‘Leren met lust. Coornherts toneelspelen’ [‘Learning with Pleasure: Coornhert’s Plays’]. In Henk Bonger, J. R. H. Hoogervorst, Nicolette Mout, Ivo Schoffer and Jan Juliaan Woltjer (eds), Dirck Volckertszoon Coornhert. Dwars maar recht [‘ Dirck Volcerktszoon Coornhert: Unruly but Correct ’], 80–97. Zutphen: De Walburg Pers.Google Scholar
Fleurkens, Anneke C. G. 1994. Stichtelijke lust. De toneelspelen van D. V. Coornhert (1522–1590) als middelen tot het geven van morele instructie [‘ Edifying Lust: The Plays of D. V. Coornhert (1522–1590) as a Means of Giving Moral Instruction ’]. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar
Fritz, Gerd. 2003. “Dialogical Structures in 17th Century Controversies”. In Marina Bondi and Sorin Stati (eds), Dialogue Analysis 2000, 199–208. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag GmbH. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fritz, Gerd, Thomas Gloning and Juliane Glüer. 2018. Historical Pragmatics of Controversies: Case Studies from 1600 to 1800. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelderblom, Arie-Jan. 1989. “‘Nieuwe stof in Neerlandsch’. Een karakteristiek van Coornherts proza” [‘“New Material in Dutch”: A Characteristic of Coornhert’s Prose’]. In Henk Bonger, J. R. H. Hoogervorst, Nicolette Mout, Ivo Schöffer and Jan Juliaan Woltjer (eds), Dirck Volcerktszoon Coornhert. Dwars maar recht [‘ Dirck Volcerktszoon Coornhert: Unruly but Correct ’], 98–114. Zutphen: De Walburg Pers. Available online at: [URL]
van de Haar, Alisa. 2019. The Golden Mean of Languages: Forging Dutch and French in the Early Modern Low Countries (1540–1620). Leiden and Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haß, Norman. 2016. Doppelte Zeitformen im Deutschen und im Französischen [‘ Doubled Tenses in German and in French ’]. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel. 2016. Sociolinguistic Styles. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermans, Theo. 2018. “The World of Literature”. In Helmer J. Helmers and Geert H. Janssen (eds), The Cambridge Companion to the Dutch Golden Age, 289–307. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan and Geoff Thompson (eds). 2003. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.). 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Jeroen (ed.). 2011. G.A. Bredero. Proza. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar
. 2017. “‘Sincere Simplicity’: Gerbrand Bredero’s Apprenticeship with Coornhert and Spiegel”. Dutch Crossing 41 (1): 4–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kern, Johan Hendrik. 1912. De met het participium praeteriti omschrevenwerkwoordsvormen in ’t Nederlands [‘ Verb Forms with the Past Participle in Dutch ’]. Amsterdam: Johannes Müller.Google Scholar
Koeneman, Olaf, Marika Lekakou and Sjef Barbiers. 2011. “Perfect Doubling”. Linguistic Variation 11 (1): 35–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Koppen, Marjo and Feike M. Dietz. 2016. “Language Dynamics in the Dutch Golden Age”. (Research project description.) Accessed 27 June 2020 at: [URL]
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Larsson, Ida and Ellen Brandner. 2014. Perfect Doubling and the Grammaticalization of Auxiliaries. Paper presented at DiGS16. 3–5 July 2014. Budapest.
Litvinov, Viktor P. and Vladimir L. Radčenko. 1998. Doppelte Perfektbildungen in der deutschen Literatursprache [‘ Double Perfects in the German Literary Language ’]. Tübingen: Stauffenburg-Verlag.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. and Peter R. R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van de Poppe, Cora. 2018. “Genitiefvariatie als instrument in Coornherts didactische programma: Semantische en stilistische functies van intra-auteur-variatie” [‘Genitive Variation as an Instrument in Coornhert’s Didactic Program: Semantic and Stylistic Functions of Intra-Author Variation’]. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal-en Letterkunde 134 (4): 277–299.Google Scholar
. 2020 (early view). “Early Modern Reader Management: Begin+Infinitive as a Discourse Marker in P.C. Hooft’s Dutch Prose”. Renaissance Studies. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rödel, Michael. 2007. Doppelte Perfektbildungen und die Organisation von Tempus im Deutschen [‘ Double Perfects and the Organisation of Tense in German ’]. Tübingen: Stauffenburg-Verlag.Google Scholar
. 2011. “New Perspectives on Double Perfect Constructions in German”. In Monika Rathert and Renate Musan (eds), Tense Across Languages, 127–146. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rutten, Gijsbert. 2016a. “Standardization and the Myth of Neutrality in Language History”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2421: 25–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016b. “Diaglossia, Individual Variation and the Limits of Standardization: Evidence from Dutch”. In Cinzia Russi (ed.), Current Trends in Historical Sociolinguistics, 194–218. Warsaw and Berlin: De Gruyter Open Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1981. “Tense Variation in Narrative”. Language 57 (1): 45–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sijs, Nicoline van der and Roland Willemyns. 2009. Het verhaal van het Nederlands: Een geschiedenis van twaalf eeuwen [‘ The Story of Dutch: A History of Twelve Centuries ’]. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario. 1999. “On the Semantics of the Pluperfect: Evidence from Germanic and Romance”. Linguistic Typology 3 (1): 51–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steele, Susan. 1975. “Past and Irrealis: Just What Does it All Mean?International Journal of American Linguistics 41 (3): 200–217. Available online at: [URL]. DOI logo
Thompson, Geoff and Laura Alba-Juez (eds). 2014. Evaluation in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Veen, Mirjam G. K. and Jesse Spohnholz. 2014. “Calvinists vs. Libertines: A New Look at Religious Exile and the Origins of ‘Dutch’ Tolerance”. In Gijsbert van den Brink and Harro M. Höpfl (eds), Calvinism and the Making of the European Mind, 76–99. Leiden and Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veenman, René. 2009. De klassieke traditie in de Lage Landen [‘ The Classical Tradition in the Low Countries ’]. Nijmegen: Uitgeverij Vantilt.Google Scholar
van der Wal, Marijke J. 1988. “De drieledige vormen in taal en taalbeschouwing” [‘The Tripartite Forms in Language and Linguistic Thought’]. De Nieuwe Taalgids 811: 383–400.Google Scholar
Wall, Joanna Helen. 2018a. Seeing Double: The HAVE Puzzle. (Master’s thesis.) Utrecht University.
. 2018b. “ Have-Doubling Constructions in Historical and Modern Dutch”. Linguistics in the Netherlands 35 (1): 155–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. Under revision. Extra-Linguistic Properties of Have-Doubling in Historical Varieties of Dutch. (Manuscript.) Utrecht University.
Zwaan, Frederik Lodewijk. 1939. Uit de geschiedenis der Nederlandsche spraakkunst [‘ From the History of Dutch Grammar ’]. Groningen: Batavia. Available online at: [URL]
Zybatow, Tatjana and Thomas Weskott. 2018. “Das Doppelperfekt: Theorie und Empirie” [‘The Double Perfect: Theory and Empirical Evidence’]. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 37 (1): 83–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar