Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 25:1 (2024) ► pp.104136

Corpora and tools

Anthony, Laurence
2018AntConc. (Version 3.5.7) [MacIntosh]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available online at: [URL]
ceal = Corpus of Early American Literature
. See Höglund and Syrjanen (2016).Google Scholar
cen = Corpus of English Novels
Created by Hendrik De Smit. See: [URL]
clmet3.0 = Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, Version 3.0
Created by Hendrik De Smet, Hans-Jürgen Diller and Jukka Tyrkkö. See: [URL]
coca = The Corpus of Contemporary American English
2008– Mark Davies (compiler). Available online at: [URL]
coha = The Corpus of Historical American English
2010– Mark Davies (compiler). Available online at: [URL]
eebo = Early English Books Online Corpus
2017Mark Davies (compiler). Available online at: [URL]
The Globe and Mail
(1844–2014) ProQuest Historical Newspapers. See: [URL]
The New York Times
(1851–1993) ProQuest Historical Newspapers. See: [URL]
ob = The Old Bailey Proceedings Online
1674–1913. Tim Hitchcock, Robert Shoemaker, Clive Emsley, Sharon Howard and Jamie McLaughlin et al. eds Available online at [URL] Version 7.0 March 2012
oed = Oxford English Dictionary
2000– (Online. Third edition.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. See: [URL]
Aijmer, Karin
1985 “What Happens at the End of Our Utterances? – The Use of Utterance-Final Tags Introduced by And and Or ”. In Ole Togeby (ed.), Papers from the Eighth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, 366–389. Copenhagen: Institut for Nordisk Filologi, Københavns Universitet.Google Scholar
2002English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate and Ulrich Detges
(eds) 2014Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
2008The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “ If You Choose/Like/Prefer/Want/Wish: The Origin of Metalinguistic and Politeness Functions”. In Marianne Hundt (ed.), Late Modern English Syntax, 271–290. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Ruth
2007 “Lists in Letters: NP-Lists and General Extenders in Early English Correspondence”. In Isabel Moskowich-Spiegel and Begoña Crespo-García (eds), Bells Chiming from the Past: Cultural and Linguistic Studies on Early English, 37–53. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Historical English Phraseology and the Extender Tag”. SELIM: Journal of the Spanish Society for Medieval English Language and Literature 15 (1): 7–37.Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna
1994Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny
2007 “Discourse Variation, Grammaticalisation, and Stuff Like That”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12 (2): 155–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dines, Elizabeth R.
1980 “Variation in Discourse and ‘Stuff Like That’”. Language in Society 9 (1): 12–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denis, Derek
2015The Development of Pragmatic Markers in Canadian English. (PhD thesis.) University of Toronto. Accessed 25 July 2020 at: [URL]
Enghels, Renata
2018 “Towards a Constructional Approach to Discourse-Level Phenomena: The Case of Spanish Interpersonal Epistemic Stance Constructions”. Folia Linguistica 52 (1): 107–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, Britt
1995 “Grammaticalization in Progress: The Case of Or Something ”. In Inger Moen, Hanne Gram Simonsen and Helge Lødrup (eds), Papers from The XVth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, 136–147. Oslo 12–15 January 1995 Oslo: Department of Linguistics, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2018 “Constructionalist Approaches”. In Thomas Hoffman and Graeme Trousdale (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 16–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004 “Lexicalization and Grammaticalization: Opposite or Orthogonal?” In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann and Björn Wiemer (eds), What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas and Graeme Trousdale
(eds) 2018The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Höglund, Mikko and Kaj Syrjänen
2016 “Corpus of Early American Literature”. ICAME Journal 40 (1): 17–38. Accessed 1 March 2021 at: [URL]. DOI logo
Hopper, Paul J.
1991 “On Some Principles of Grammaticization”. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization, 17–35. (Volume 11.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. (Second edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McColm, Dan and Graeme Trousdale
2019 “Whatever Happened to Whatever? ” In Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen and Willem B. Hollmann (eds), Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax, 81–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noël, Dirk
2007 “Diachronic Construction Grammar and Grammaticalization Theory”. Functions of Language 14 (2): 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega Barrera, Ivalla
2012 “A Diachronic Discussion of Extenders in English Remedies Found in the Corpus of Early English Recipes (1350–1850)”. In Hans Sauer and Gaby Waxenberger (eds), English Historical Linguistics 2008, 223–236. (Volume II1: Words, Texts and Genres.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann
1999Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014 “The Role of Pragmatic Function in the Grammaticalization of English General Extenders”. Pragmatics 24 (1): 105–129.Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann and George Yule
1997 “On Being Inexplicit and Stuff in Contemporary American English”. Journal of English Linguistics 25 (3): 250–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021General Extenders: The Forms and Functions of a New Linguistic Category. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palacios Martínez, Ignacio M.
2011 “ I Might, I Might Go I Mean it Depends on Money Things and Stuff’: A Preliminary Analysis of General Extenders in British Teenagers’ Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (9): 2452–2470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perek, Florent
2020 “Productivity and Schematicity in Constructional Change”. In Lotte Sommerer and Elena Smirnova (eds), Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, 141–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pichler, Heike and Stephen Levey
2011 “In Search of Grammaticalization in Synchronic Dialect Data: General Extenders in Northeast England”. English Language and Linguistics 15 (3): 441–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poutsma, Hendrik
1916A Grammar of Late Modern English, for the Use of Continental, Especially Dutch, Students. (Part II The Parts of Speech. Section I, B Pronouns and Numerals.) Groningen: P. Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2016a “Antecedents of Innovation: Exploring General Extenders in Conservative Dialects”. In Heike Pichler (ed.), Discourse–Pragmatic Variation and Change in English: New Methods and Insights, 115–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016bTeen Talk: The Language of Adolescents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Derek Denis
2010 “The Stuff of Change: General Extenders in Toronto, Canada”. Journal of English Linguistics 38 (4): 335–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1982 “From Propositional to Textual and Expressive Meanings: Some Semantic–Pragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization”. In Winfred P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel (eds), Perspectives on Historical Linguistics, 245–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “On the Rise of Types of Clause-Final Pragmatic Markers in English”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17 (1): 26–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme
2012 “Grammaticalization, Constructions and the Grammaticalization of Constructions”. In Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems and Tine Mortelmanns (eds), Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections, 167–197. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek
2014 “Degeneracy: The Maintenance of Constructional Networks”. In Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman and Gijsbert Rutten (eds), Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, 141–179. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, Joanne and Catrin Norrby
2000 “Set Marking Tags –‘and Stuff’”. In John Henderson (ed.), Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. Perth 28 September to 2 October 1999 Accessed 18 August 2020 at: [URL]