Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics: Online-First ArticlesChinese “face”-related expressions in Peking and Teochew Opera scripts
A historical contrastive pragmatic inquiry
This paper presents a historical contrastive pragmatic study of the use of Chinese “face”-related expressions in
Peking and Teochew Opera scripts. The rationale behind this investigation is that contemporary Mandarin and the Minnan Dialect
operate with very different inventories of “face”-related expressions, and it is worth considering whether this difference also
applies to historical language use, and, if so, how. Studying this matter is particularly relevant for historical pragmatic
research because “face”-related expressions have been under-represented in the field. Our study is based on a corpus of nineteen
Peking Opera scripts and a comparable corpus of nineteen Teochew Opera scripts, dating from the sixteenth and seventeenth
centuries. The results of our analysis show that the historical Mandarin corpus operates with a duality of the “face”-related
expressions lian and mian, in a similar way to modern Mandarin, even though we also found
differences between the ways in which these expressions were used in former times and at present. Yet such differences are
eclipsed if we contrast historical Mandarin with the Teochew scripts where we found a very different “face” duality than in
Mandarin, namely a duality of yan and mian. This duality also differs from what one can witness
in present-day Minnan.
Keywords: “face”-related expressions, historical contrastive analysis, Mandarin, Minnan, Peking Opera, Teochew Opera
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Review of literature
- 3.Methodology and data
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1Core expressions of “face” in Peking and Teochew Opera corpora
- 4.1.1The Peking Opera corpus
- 4.1.2The Teochew Opera corpus
- 4.2Uses of “similar” “face”-related collocations in our corpora
- 4.2.1Group 1: Have what (有乜/何/啥) + “face” collocations
- 4.2.2Group 2: “For the sake of someone’s face” collocations
- 4.1Core expressions of “face” in Peking and Teochew Opera corpora
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
Published online: 29 February 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.23020.che
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.23020.che
References (45)
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca. 2003. “Face
and Politeness: New (Insights) for Old (Concepts)”. Journal of
Pragmatics 35 (10–11): 1453–1469.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1978. “Universals
in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena”. In Esther N. Goody (ed.), Questions
and Politeness: Strategies in Social
Interaction, 56–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chan, Angela, Stephanie Schnurr and Olga Zayts. 2018. “Exploring
Face, Identity and Relationship Management in Disagreements in Business Meetings in Hong
Kong”. Journal of Politeness
Research 14 (2): 279–306.
Chang, Wei-Lin Melody and Michael Haugh. 2011. “Strategic
Embarrassment and Face Threatening in Business Interactions”. Journal of
Pragmatics 43 (12): 2948–2963.
Chen, Jiejun, Dániel Z. Kádár and Juliane House. 2022. “‘Face’
Expressions in the Minnan Dialect of Chinese”. Language
Sciences 941 (2022): 101510.
Chen, Li-Hsin, Jennifer Pasion Loverio and Ching-Cheng Shen. 2021. “The
Role of Face (mien-tzu) in Chinese Tourists’ Destination Choice and Behaviors”. Journal of
Hospitality and Tourism
Management 48 (2021): 500–508.
Culpeper, Jonathan and Jane Demmen. 2011. “Nineteenth-Century
English Politeness: Negative Politeness, Conventional Indirect Requests and the Rise of the Individual
Self”. Journal of Historical
Pragmatics 12 (1/2): 49–81.
Goffman, Erving. 1955. “On
Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social
Interaction”. Psychiatry 18 (3): 213–231.
Haugh, Michael and Carl Hinze. 2003. “A
Metalinguistic Approach to Deconstructing the Concepts of ‘Face’ and ‘Politeness’ in Chinese, English and
Japanese”. Journal of
Pragmatics 35 (10–11): 1581–1611.
He, Yun. 2012. “Different
Generations, Different Face? A Discursive Approach to Naturally Occurring Compliment Responses in
Chinese”. Journal of Politeness
Research 8 (1): 29–51.
He, Lin, Rong Chen and Ming Dong. 2023. “Humorous
Mockery: How to Amuse and Be Polite at the Same Time”. Journal of
Pragmatics 211 (2023): 31–41.
Hinze, Carl. 2005. “The
Importance of Chinese miàn and liǎn as Emic
Categories”. In Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini and Maurizio Gotti (eds), Asian
Business
Discourse, 169–210. Berlin: Peter Lang.
. 2012. “Chinese
Politeness is Not About ‘Face’: Evidence from the Business World”. Journal of Politeness
Research 8 (1): 11–27.
House, Juliane and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2021. Cross-Cultural
Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hu, Hsien Chin. 1944. “The Chinese Concepts of
‘Face’”. American
Anthropologist 46 (1): 45–64. Available
online at: [URL].
Jacobs, Andreas and Andreas H. Jucker. 1995. “The
Historical Perspective in Pragmatics”. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical
Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of
English, 3–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jin, Yaoji 金耀基. 2006. “‘Mian’,
‘chi’ yu Zhongguoren xingwei zhi fenxi ‘面’、‘耻’与中国人行为之分析” [‘An Analysis of “Mian”, “Shame” and the Behaviour of
Chinese People’].
Zhongguo shehui xinlixue
pinglun
中国社会心理学评论 [‘
Chinese
Social Psychological
Review
’] (1): 48–64. [URL]
Jucker, Andreas. 2011. “Positive
and Negative Face as Descriptive Categories in the History of English”. Journal of Historical
Pragmatics 12 (1/2): 178–197.
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2019. “Politeness and Impoliteness in
Chinese Discourse”. In Chris Shei (ed.), The
Routledge Handbook of Chinese Discourse Analysis
Routledge, 203–215. London: Routledge.
Kádár, Dániel Z. and Yuling Pan. 2012. “Chinese
‘Face’ and Im/Politeness: An Introduction”. Journal of Politeness
Research 8 (1): 1–10.
King, Ambrose Yeo-chi and John T. Myers. 1977. “Shame
as an Incomplete Conception of Chinese Culture: A Study of Face”. Social Research Centre,
Occasional Paper No. 63. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Available online
at: [URL]
Kinnison, Li Qing. 2017. “Power, Integrity, and Mask –
An Attempt to Disentangle the Chinese Face Concept”. Journal of
Pragmatics 1141: 32–48.
Li, Hui. 2020. “Towards
an Emic Understanding of Mianzi Giving in the Chinese Context”. Journal of Politeness
Research 16 (2): 281–303.
Lin, Yu-tang. 1936/2010. “
Wu guo yu wu min
吾国与吾民
” [‘
My Country and My
People
’]. Nanjing: Jiangsu wenyi chubanshe.
Lu, Xun. 1934. “Shuo “mianzi” 说“面子” [‘On
face’]. In Lu Xun (ed.),
Qiejie ting zawen
且介亭杂文 [‘
Essays of Qie Jie
Ting
’], 128–131. Beijing: Renmin wenxue chubanshe.
Mao, Luming Robert. 1994. “Beyond Politeness Theory:
‘Face’ Revisited and Renewed”. Journal of
Pragmatics 21 (5): 451–486.
Meurman-Solin, Anneli. 2012. “Historical
Dialectology: Space as a Variable in the Reconstruction of Regional
Dialects”. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy and Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds), The
Handbook of Historical
Sociolinguistics, 465–479. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
O’Driscoll, Jim. 2017. “Face
and (Im)Politeness”. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds), The
Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic
(Im)Politeness, 89–118. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pan, Yuling. 2011. “Cantonese
Politeness in the Interviewing Setting”. Journal of Asian Pacific
Communication 21 (1): 10–33.
Pan, Yuling and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2011. Politeness
in Historical and Contemporary
Chinese. London: Bloomsbury.
Qi, Xiaoying. 2011. “Face:
A Chinese Concept in a Global Sociology”. Journal of
Sociology 47 (3): 279–295.
Ruhi, Şükriye and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2012. “‘Face’
across Historical Cultures: A Comparative Study of Turkish and Chinese”. Journal of Historical
Pragmatics 12 (1/2): 25–48.
Sifianou, Maria. 2011. “On
the Concept of Face and Politeness”. In Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds), Politeness
across
Cultures, 42–58. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Su, Hsi-Yao. 2009. “Code-Switching
in Managing a Face-Threatening Communicative Task: Footing and Ambiguity in Conversational Interaction in
Taiwan”. Journal of
Pragmatics 41 (2): 372–392.
Su, Hsi-Yao and Wan-Hsin Lee. 2022. “Metadiscourse
of Impoliteness, Language Ideology, and Identity: Offense-Taking as Social Action”. Journal of
Politeness
Research 18 (2): 227–255.
Wang, Jiayi and Helen Spencer-Oatey. 2015. “The
Gains and Losses of Face in Ongoing Intercultural Interaction: A Case Study of Chinese Participant
Perspectives”. Journal of
Pragmatics 891: 50–65.
Yin, Xiaojie 殷晓杰. 2009. “‘Mian’ yu
‘lian’ de lishi jingzheng yu gongshi fenbu “面”与“脸”的历时竞争与共时分佈” [‘The Diachronic Competition and Synchronic Distributing
between “Mian (面)” and “Lian (脸)”’].
Hanyushi
Xuebao
汉语史学报 (00): 158–167.
Yu, Ning. 2001. “What
Does Our Face Mean to Is?” Pragmatics and
Cognition 9 (1): 1–36.
Zhang, Ping. 2021. “From
Silence to Positive Self-presentation: Gradual Emergence of Negative Face Wants in Kǒngguīzú’s (恐归族) Intergenerational
Conflicts with Their Family Elders”. Journal of Politeness
Research 17 (2): 291–313.