Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics: Online-First Articles

Chinese “face”-related expressions in Peking and Teochew Opera scripts

A historical contrastive pragmatic inquiry

| HUN-REN Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics
| HUN-REN Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics | University of Hamburg | Hellenic American University
| HUN-REN Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics | Dalian University of Foreign Languages | University of Maribor
This paper presents a historical contrastive pragmatic study of the use of Chinese “face”-related expressions in Peking and Teochew Opera scripts. The rationale behind this investigation is that contemporary Mandarin and the Minnan Dialect operate with very different inventories of “face”-related expressions, and it is worth considering whether this difference also applies to historical language use, and, if so, how. Studying this matter is particularly relevant for historical pragmatic research because “face”-related expressions have been under-represented in the field. Our study is based on a corpus of nineteen Peking Opera scripts and a comparable corpus of nineteen Teochew Opera scripts, dating from the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The results of our analysis show that the historical Mandarin corpus operates with a duality of the “face”-related expressions lian and mian, in a similar way to modern Mandarin, even though we also found differences between the ways in which these expressions were used in former times and at present. Yet such differences are eclipsed if we contrast historical Mandarin with the Teochew scripts where we found a very different “face” duality than in Mandarin, namely a duality of yan and mian. This duality also differs from what one can witness in present-day Minnan.
Keywords: “face”-related expressions, historical contrastive analysis, Mandarin, Minnan, Peking Opera, Teochew Opera
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Review of literature
  • 3.Methodology and data
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Core expressions of “face” in Peking and Teochew Opera corpora
      • 4.1.1The Peking Opera corpus
      • 4.1.2The Teochew Opera corpus
    • 4.2Uses of “similar” “face”-related collocations in our corpora
      • 4.2.1Group 1: Have what (有乜/何/啥) + “face” collocations
      • 4.2.2Group 2: “For the sake of someone’s face” collocations
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 29 February 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.23020.che
References (45)
References
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca. 2003. “Face and Politeness: New (Insights) for Old (Concepts)”. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (10–11): 1453–1469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1978. “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena”. In Esther N. Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, 56–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals of Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chan, Angela, Stephanie Schnurr and Olga Zayts. 2018. “Exploring Face, Identity and Relationship Management in Disagreements in Business Meetings in Hong Kong”. Journal of Politeness Research 14 (2): 279–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, Wei-Lin Melody and Michael Haugh. 2011. “Strategic Embarrassment and Face Threatening in Business Interactions”. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (12): 2948–2963. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Jiejun, Dániel Z. Kádár and Juliane House. 2022. “‘Face’ Expressions in the Minnan Dialect of Chinese”. Language Sciences 941 (2022): 101510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Li-Hsin, Jennifer Pasion Loverio and Ching-Cheng Shen. 2021. “The Role of Face (mien-tzu) in Chinese Tourists’ Destination Choice and Behaviors”. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 48 (2021): 500–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Rong. 2001. “Self-Politeness: A Proposal”. Journal of Pragmatics 33 (1): 87–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Jane Demmen. 2011. “Nineteenth-Century English Politeness: Negative Politeness, Conventional Indirect Requests and the Rise of the Individual Self”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12 (1/2): 49–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1955. “On Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction”. Psychiatry 18 (3): 213–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gu, Yueguo. 1990. “Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese”. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 237–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael and Carl Hinze. 2003. “A Metalinguistic Approach to Deconstructing the Concepts of ‘Face’ and ‘Politeness’ in Chinese, English and Japanese”. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (10–11): 1581–1611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
He, Yun. 2012. “Different Generations, Different Face? A Discursive Approach to Naturally Occurring Compliment Responses in Chinese”. Journal of Politeness Research 8 (1): 29–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
He, Lin, Rong Chen and Ming Dong. 2023. “Humorous Mockery: How to Amuse and Be Polite at the Same Time”. Journal of Pragmatics 211 (2023): 31–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinze, Carl. 2005. “The Importance of Chinese miàn and liǎn as Emic Categories”. In Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini and Maurizio Gotti (eds), Asian Business Discourse, 169–210. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Chinese Politeness is Not About ‘Face’: Evidence from the Business World”. Journal of Politeness Research 8 (1): 11–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2021. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hu, Hsien Chin. 1944. “The Chinese Concepts of ‘Face’”. American Anthropologist 46 (1): 45–64. Available online at: [URL]. DOI logo
Jacobs, Andreas and Andreas H. Jucker. 1995. “The Historical Perspective in Pragmatics”. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, 3–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jin, Yaoji 金耀基. 2006. “‘Mian’, ‘chi’ yu Zhongguoren xingwei zhi fenxi ‘面’、‘耻’与中国人行为之分析” [‘An Analysis of “Mian”, “Shame” and the Behaviour of Chinese People’]. Zhongguo shehui xinlixue pinglun 中国社会心理学评论 [‘ Chinese Social Psychological Review ’] (1): 48–64. [URL]
Jucker, Andreas. 2011. “Positive and Negative Face as Descriptive Categories in the History of English”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12 (1/2): 178–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2019. “Politeness and Impoliteness in Chinese Discourse”. In Chris Shei (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Discourse Analysis Routledge, 203–215. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. and Yuling Pan. 2012. “Chinese ‘Face’ and Im/Politeness: An Introduction”. Journal of Politeness Research 8 (1): 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
King, Ambrose Yeo-chi and John T. Myers. 1977. “Shame as an Incomplete Conception of Chinese Culture: A Study of Face”. Social Research Centre, Occasional Paper No. 63. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Available online at: [URL]
Kinnison, Li Qing. 2017. “Power, Integrity, and Mask – An Attempt to Disentangle the Chinese Face Concept”. Journal of Pragmatics 1141: 32–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Hui. 2020. “Towards an Emic Understanding of Mianzi Giving in the Chinese Context”. Journal of Politeness Research 16 (2): 281–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Yu-tang. 1936/2010. “ Wu guo yu wu min 吾国与吾民 ” [‘ My Country and My People ’]. Nanjing: Jiangsu wenyi chubanshe.Google Scholar
Lu, Xun. 1934. “Shuo “mianzi” 说“面子” [‘On face’]. In Lu Xun (ed.), Qiejie ting zawen 且介亭杂文 [‘ Essays of Qie Jie Ting ’], 128–131. Beijing: Renmin wenxue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Mao, Luming Robert. 1994. “Beyond Politeness Theory: ‘Face’ Revisited and Renewed”. Journal of Pragmatics 21 (5): 451–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meurman-Solin, Anneli. 2012. “Historical Dialectology: Space as a Variable in the Reconstruction of Regional Dialects”. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy and Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, 465–479. New York: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Driscoll, Jim. 2017. “Face and (Im)Politeness”. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, 89–118. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, Yuling. 2011. “Cantonese Politeness in the Interviewing Setting”. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 21 (1): 10–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, Yuling and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2011. Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Qi, Xiaoying. 2011. “Face: A Chinese Concept in a Global Sociology”. Journal of Sociology 47 (3): 279–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruhi, Şükriye and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2012. “‘Face’ across Historical Cultures: A Comparative Study of Turkish and Chinese”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12 (1/2): 25–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
St. André, James. 2013. “How the Chinese Lost ‘Face’”. Journal of Pragmatics 551: 68–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, Maria. 2011. “On the Concept of Face and Politeness”. In Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds), Politeness across Cultures, 42–58. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Su, Hsi-Yao. 2009. “Code-Switching in Managing a Face-Threatening Communicative Task: Footing and Ambiguity in Conversational Interaction in Taiwan”. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (2): 372–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Su, Hsi-Yao and Wan-Hsin Lee. 2022. “Metadiscourse of Impoliteness, Language Ideology, and Identity: Offense-Taking as Social Action”. Journal of Politeness Research 18 (2): 227–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Jiayi and Helen Spencer-Oatey. 2015. “The Gains and Losses of Face in Ongoing Intercultural Interaction: A Case Study of Chinese Participant Perspectives”. Journal of Pragmatics 891: 50–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yin, Xiaojie 殷晓杰. 2009. “‘Mian’ yu ‘lian’ de lishi jingzheng yu gongshi fenbu “面”与“脸”的历时竞争与共时分佈” [‘The Diachronic Competition and Synchronic Distributing between “Mian (面)” and “Lian (脸)”’]. Hanyushi Xuebao 汉语史学报 (00): 158–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, Ning. 2001. “What Does Our Face Mean to Is?” Pragmatics and Cognition 9 (1): 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Ping. 2021. “From Silence to Positive Self-presentation: Gradual Emergence of Negative Face Wants in Kǒngguīzú’s (恐归族) Intergenerational Conflicts with Their Family Elders”. Journal of Politeness Research 17 (2): 291–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Ling and Shao-jie Zhang. 2017. “How Face as a System of Value-Constructs Operates through the Interplay of Mianzi and Lian in Chinese: A Corpus-based Study”. Language Sciences 641: 152–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Ziyuan 祝子媛. 2013. “‘Lian’ yu ‘mian’ de ciyi yanbian yanjiu “脸”与“面”的词义演变研究” [“Research on the Semantic Change of ‘Lian’ and ‘Mian’”]. Nanning Zhiye Jishu Xueyuan Xuebao 南宁职业技术学院学报 (04): 84–88.Google Scholar