The theory of ritual presented in this article is based on the notion of “territory.” Ritual performance encompasses a set of techniques to affect the identity of participants: away from individuality and by communal demarcation of a symbolic territorial model in space or time. The form of ritual is seen as autonomous, i.e. as relatively independent of meaning. As a set of identity-affecting techniques, the elements of ritual can be integrated into both religious and secular settings. There is a natural tension between individuality, responsibility and the potentially totalitarian implications of ritual discourse. Ritual is claimed to be relatively harmless with respect to the symbolic territories of designated “sacred spaces”, while it is considered dangerous under conditions of “overflow”, when the elements of ritual are brought into public space. The harmful secular religions of the past two centuries are discussed, culminating in a plea for the separation between Ritual and State.
2013. In-group ritual and relational work. Journal of Pragmatics 58 ► pp. 73 ff.
Miranda, Marcelo Marques
2019. The Resurgence of the Heritage of Indigenous Peoples of Thailand in the Aftermath of Development. Journal of Heritage Management 4:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
O'Dowd, Liam & Martina McKnight
2013. Urban Intersections: Religion and Violence in Belfast. Space and Polity 17:3 ► pp. 357 ff.
2021. Does Religion Still Matter?. In When Politics are Sacralized, ► pp. 337 ff.
Scott, Sasha A Q
2017. Mediatized Witnessing and the Ethical Imperative of Capture. International Journal of E-Politics 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Scott, Sasha A Q
2020. Mediatized Witnessing and the Ethical Imperative of Capture. In Media Controversy, ► pp. 373 ff.
Scott, Sasha A. Q.
2022. Networked Solidarity. In Coping Rituals in Fearful Times, ► pp. 137 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.