This paper explores the question how far “letters” as one specific text type can be subdivided into smaller groups of texts (i.e. subtypes such as “requests”, “orders”, or “reports”) on the basis of socio-psychological and pragmatic dimensions and factors, including speech act and accommodation theory. This paper argues that this differentiation into socio-pragmatic subtypes actually can be made and that these subtypes materialize in significant systematic morphosyntactic variability. The idea is explored and illustrated on the basis of pronoun and relativizer variation in the late Middle English Paston Letters. In particular, it is shown how authors use their individual stylistic freedom to pursue specific communicative purposes in different types of letters.
2022. Contacto de lenguas y usos gráficos en las cartas de un scriptor semiculto mallorquín (Antonio Estada, 1789-1790). Verba: Anuario Galego de Filoloxía► pp. 1 ff.
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
2019. Register, Genre, and Style,
Murphy, Sean
2019. Shakespeare and his contemporaries: Designing a genre classification scheme for Early English Books Online 1560–1640. ICAME Journal 43:1 ► pp. 59 ff.
Voeste, Anja
2018. The self as a source. A peasant farmer’s letters from prison (1848–1852). Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 4:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Große, Sybille, Agnès Steuckardt, Lena Sowada, Beatrice Dal Bo, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. Du rituel à l’individuel dans des correspondances peu lettrées de la Grande Guerre. SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 06008 ff.
Brdar-Szabó, Rita & Mario Brdar
2009. Indirect directives in recipes: a cross-linguistic perspective. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5:1
[no author supplied]
2011. References. In A Companion to the Latin Language, ► pp. 582 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.