Article published in:
Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Vol. 7:1 (2019) ► pp. 3060
References

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R.
(Eds.) (2001) A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Austrian Federal Ministry of Education
Austrian Federal Ministry for Education and Women (Ed.)
(2011) Die kompetenzorientierte mündliche Reifeprüfung in den Unterrichtsgegenständen Geschichte und Sozialkunde, Politische Bildung. Empfehlende Richtlinien und Beispiele für Themenpool und Prüfungsaufgaben [The competency-oriented oral final exam for the subjects history, social science, political education. Recommending guidelines and examples for exams]. Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry for Education and Women. Retrieved from https://​bildung​.bmbwf​.gv​.at​/schulen​/unterricht​/ba​/reifepruefung​_ahs​_lfgsk​_21067​.pdf
Badertscher, H., & Bieri, T.
(2009) Wissenserwerb im Content and Language Integrated Learning: Empirische Befunde und Interpretationen [Knowledge acquisition in Content and Language Integrated Learning: empirical evidence and interpretations]. Bern: Haupt Publishing.Google Scholar
Bauer-Marschallinger, S.
(2016) Acquisition of historical competences in the CLIL history classroom (Diploma Thesis). University of Vienna, Vienna. Retrieved from http://​othes​.univie​.ac​.at​/42043/
Beacco, J.-C., Fleming, M., & Goullier, F.
(2016) The language dimension in all subjects: A handbook for curriculum development and teacher training. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C.
(2011) Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill, Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, B.
(1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York, NY: McKay.Google Scholar
Breeze, R., & Dafouz, E.
(2017) Constructing complex Cognitive Discourse Functions in higher education: An exploratory study of exam answers in Spanish- and English-medium instruction settings. System, 70, 81–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
California Department of Education (Ed.)
(2016) History-Social Science Framework. Retrieved from https://​www​.cde​.ca​.gov​/ci​/hs​/cf​/sbedrafthssfw​.asp
Coffin, C.
(2006) Historical discourse: The language of time, cause, and evaluation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Comunidad de Madrid
(2015) Curriculum Secondary Compulsory Education. (History Curriculum, pp. 58–71). Retrieved from https://​www​.bocm​.es​/boletin​/CM​_Orden​_BOCM​/2015​/05​/20​/BOCM​-20150520​-1​.PDF
Dafouz, E., Camacho, M., & Urquia, E.
(2014) ‘Surely they can’t do as well’: A comparison of business students’ academic performance in English-medium and Spanish-as-first-language-medium programmes. Language and Education, 28(3), 223–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C.
(2013) A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 216–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Cognitive discourse functions: specifying and integrative interdisciplinary construct. In T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore, & U. Smit (Eds.), Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education (pp. 29–54). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C., Bauer-Marschallinger, S., Brückl-Mackey, K., Hofmann, V., Hopf, J., Kröss, L., & Lechner, L.
(2018) Cognitive discourse functions in Austrian CLIL lessons: towards an empirical validation of the CDF Construct. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U.
(2013) Content and language integrated learning: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 46(4), 545–559. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ehlich, K., & Rehbein, J.
(1986) Muster und Institution. Untersuchungen zur schulischen Kommunikation [Pattern and institution. Studies on school communication]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Ehlich, K.
(1991) Funktional-pragmatische Kommunikationsanalyse [Functional-pragmatic analysis of communication]. In D. Flader (Ed.), Verbale Interaktion. Studien zur Empirie und Methodologie der Pragmatik [Verbal interaction. Studies on empiricism and methodology of pragmatics] (pp. 127–143). Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. J.
(2010) Disciplinary literacies across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(7), 587–597. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gablasova, D.
(2014) Issues in the assessment of bilingually educated students: Expressing subject knowledge through L1 and L2. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 151–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Götz, S., Grossmann, W., Jenko, E., & Vorderwinkler, K.
(2014) Fachdidaktik an der Universität Wien [Subject didactics at the University of Vienna]. Journal für LehrerInnenbildung [Journal for Teacher Education] 3, 82–93.Google Scholar
Hallet, W., & Königs, F. G.
(Eds.) (2013) Handbuch Bilingualer Unterricht [Handbook of bilingual education]. Seelze: Klett-Kallmeyer.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1993) Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
(2004) An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Heil, W.
(2010) Kompetenzorientierter Geschichtsunterricht [Competency-based history education]. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Heimes, A.
(2011) Psycholinguistic thought meets sociocultural theory: Die integrativen Zusammenhänge von Fachmethodik und Fremdsprachenlernen im bilingualen (Geschichts-)Unterricht [The integrative connections of subject didactics and foreign language learning in bilingual (history) education]. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Jones-Nerzic, R./International School History
(2014) Unit 5: What were the social consequences of the Industrial Revolution? Retrieved from http://​www​.internationalschoolhistory​.net​/eeb3​/s5​/extra​/social​_consequences​_ppt​.htm
Klieme, E., & Hartig, J.
(2007) Kompetenzkonzepte in den Sozialwissenschaften und im erziehungswissenschaftlichen Diskurs [Concepts of competence in social sciences and educational discourse]. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaften [Journal of Educational Science], 8, 11–29.Google Scholar
Körber, A., Schreiber, W., & Schöner, A.
(Eds.) (2007) Kompetenzen historischen Denkens: Ein Strukturmodell als Beitrag zur Kompetenzorientierung in der Geschichtsdidaktik [Competences of historical thinking: A structural model contributing to competency-based history didactics]. Neuried: ars una.Google Scholar
Kühberger, C.
(2009) Kompetenzorientiertes historisches und politisches Lernen: Methodische und didaktische Annäherungen an Geschichte, Sozialkunde und politische Bildung [Competency-based historical and political learning: Methodological and didactic approaches towards history, social studies and political education]. Innsbruck: Studienverlag.Google Scholar
(2011) Operatoren als strukturierende Elemente von Aufgabenstellungen für Geschichte, Sozialkunde und Politische Bildung [Performative verbs as structuring elements for task design in history education]. In Bundesministerium für Bildung [Ministry of education] (Eds.), Die kompetenzorientierte Reifeprüfung Geschichte und Sozialkunde, Politische Bildung [Competency-based final exam for history, social studies and political education] (pp. 15–20). Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry for Education and Women. Retrieved from https://​bildung​.bmbwf​.gv​.at​/schulen​/unterricht​/ba​/reifepruefung​_ahs​_lfgsk​_21067​.pdf
Lemke, J. L.
(1990) Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Lin, A. Y. M.
(2016) Language across the curriculum & CLIL in English as an Additional Language (EAL) contexts. Theory and practice. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R.
(2012) The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer-Hamme, J.
(2007) Historische Kompetenzen empirisch [Historical competences empirically]. In A. Körber, W. Schreiber, & A. Schöner (Eds.), Kompetenzen historischen Denkens [Competences of historical thinking] (pp. 674–693). Neuried: ars una.Google Scholar
Mohan, B. A.
(1986) Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
(2001) The second language as a medium of learning. In B. A. Mohan, C. Leung, & C. Davison (Eds.), English as a second language in the mainstream (pp. 107–126). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Mohan, B. A., & Huang, J.
(2002) Assessing the integration of language and content in a Mandarin as a foreign language classroom. Linguistics and Education, 13(3), 405–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikula, T., Dafouz, E., Moore, P., & Smit, U.
(Eds.) (2016) Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, E.
(2015) Progress in English academic vocabulary use in writing among CLIL and non-CLIL students in Sweden. Moderna Språk [Modern Language], 109(2), 51–74.Google Scholar
Pandel, H.-J.
(2012) Geschichtsunterricht nach PISA: Kompetenzen, Bildungsstandards und Kerncurricula [History education after PISA: competences, educational standards and core curricula] (3rd ed.). Schwalbach/Taunus: Wochenschau-Verlag.Google Scholar
Pérez-Cañado, M. L.
(2012) CLIL research in Europe: past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rüsen, J.
(1983) Historische Vernunft: Grundzüge einer Historik [Historical reasoning: Essentials of a ‘historic‘]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
(2008) Historische Orientierung: über die Arbeit des Geschichtsbewußtseins, sich in der Zeit zurechtzufinden [Historical orientation: the labour of historical awareness, orientating oneself in time]. (2nd ed.). Schwalbach/Taunus: Wochenschau-Verlag.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M.
(2004) The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. J., & O’Hallaron, C. L.
(2011) Teaching academic language in L2 secondary settings. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 3–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. J., Greer, S., & Taylor, S.
(2008) Literacy in history: Language and meaning. Australian Journnal of Language and Literacy, 31(2), 174–187.Google Scholar
Schöner, A.
(2007) Kompetenzbereich historische Sachkompetenzen [The domain of historical expertise]. In A. Körber, W. Schreiber, & A. Schöner (Eds.), Kompetenzen historischen Denkens [Competences of historical thinking] (pp. 265–314). Neuried: ars una.Google Scholar
Schreiber, W.
(2007) Kompetenzbereich historische Methodenkompetenzen [The domain of methodological competence]. In A. Körber, W. Schreiber, & A. Schöner (Eds.), Kompetenzen historischen Denkens [Competences of historical thinking] (pp. 194–235). Neuried: ars una.Google Scholar
Schreiber, W., Schöner, A., & Sochatzy, F.
(2013) Analyse von Schulbüchern als Grundlage empirischer Geschichtsdidaktik [Textbook analysis as foundation of empirical history didactics]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Tang, G. M.
(2001) Teaching content knowledge and ESL in multicultural classrooms. In M. A. Snow & D. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom (pp. 69–77). White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Trautwein, U., Bertram, C., Borries, B. von, Brauch, N., Hirsch, M., Schröter, K., … Zuckowski, A.
(2017) Kompetenzen historischen Denkens erfassen: Konzeption, Operationalisierung und Befunde des Projekts [Conceiving competences of historical thinking: conceptualisation, operationalisation and evidence]. Historical Thinking – Competencies in History” (HiTCH). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
van Drie, J., & van Boxtel, C.
(2008) Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20(2), 87–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1986) Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Weinert, F. E.
(2001) Vergleichende Leistungsmessung in Schulen: Eine umstrittene Selbstverständlichkeit [Comparative assessment in schools: a controversial matter-of-course]. In F. E. Weinert (Ed.), Leistungsmessung in Schulen [Assessment in schools] (pp. 17–31). Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
Wenzel, A., Schöner, A., & Schreiber, W.
(2005) Fragekompetenz: Grundlegung [Questioning competence: Foundations]. In S. Mebus, & W. Schreiber (Eds.), Geschichte denken statt pauken [Thinking history instead of cramming] (pp. 59–69). Meißen: Sächsische Akademie für Lehrerfortbildung.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

del Pozo, Elena & Ana Llinares
2021.  In International Perspectives on CLIL,  pp. 43 ff. Crossref logo
Doiz, Aintzane & David Lasagabaster
2021. An analysis of the use of cognitive discourse functions in English-medium history teaching at university. English for Specific Purposes 62  pp. 58 ff. Crossref logo
Escobar Urmeneta, Cristina
2020.  In Teacher Training for English-Medium Instruction in Higher Education [Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development, ],  pp. 179 ff. Crossref logo
Evnitskaya, Natalia & Christiane Dalton-Puffer
2020. Cognitive discourse functions in CLIL classrooms: eliciting and analysing students’ oral categorizations in science and history. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Álvarez-Martínez-Iglesias, José-María, Francisco-Javier Trigueros-Cano, Pedro Miralles-Martínez & Jesús Molina-Saorín
2020. Assessment by Competences in Social Sciences: Secondary Students Perception Based on the EPECOCISO Scale. Sustainability 12:23  pp. 10056 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.