Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Vol. 8:1 (2020) ► pp.28–52

Mapping lecturer questions and their pedagogical goals in Spanish- and English-medium instruction

| Universidad Complutense de Madrid
This article explores the relationship between teacher questioning practices and pedagogical objectives in Spanish- and English-medium lectures. The results obtained from the analysis of 16 lectures delivered by the same two university teachers both in Spanish and English reveal that the use of questions could be exploited more effectively for pedagogical purposes. Consequently, this paper tries to raise teachers’ awareness of the role of questions upon their teaching and their students’ learning process.
Keywords: questions, EMI, classroom discourse, pedagogical goals, teacher education
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework
    • 2.1Teaching and learning as an interactive process
    • 2.2Questions as a lens to study classroom interaction and learning
    • 2.3Interweaving classroom discourse and pedagogical goals
  • 3.Research study and methodology
    • 3.1Context and research questions
    • 3.2Design and participants
    • 3.3Data collection, analysis and taxonomies
  • 4.Results: Questions and pedagogical goals in university lectures
    • 4.1Managerial mode
    • 4.2Materials mode
    • 4.3Skills and System mode
    • 4.4Classroom Context mode
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Concluding remarks and pedagogical implications
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 31 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.18016.san
References (65)
References
Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Cambridge: Dialogos.Google Scholar
Ament, J. R., & Pérez Vidal, C. (2015). Linguistic outcomes of English medium instruction programmes in higher education: A study on Economics undergraduates at a Catalan university. Higher Learning Research Communications, 5(1), 47–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2013). Analysing genre language use in professional settings. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 21, 8–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. (1993). Representativeness in corpus design. Journal of Literacy and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cammarata, L., & Ó Ceallaigh, T. J. (2018). Teacher education and professional development for immersion and content-based instruction: Research on programs, practices, and teacher educators. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 6(2), 153–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cammarata, L., & Tedick, D. (2012). Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers. Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 251–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, Y. (2012). The use of questions by lecturers in lectures given in English: Influences of disciplinary cultures. English for Specific Purposes, 311, 103–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, S. W. (2012). ‘That’s it for today’: Academic lecture closings and the impact of class size. English for Specific Purposes, 31(4), 234–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christie, F. (2005). Language education in the primary years. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
Churchill, R. (2011). Teaching: Making a difference. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2007). The language of business studies lectures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Interactive discourse structuring in L2 guest lectures: Some insights from a comparative corpus-based study. English for Specific Purposes, 31, 183–199.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dafouz, E., & Sánchez-García, D. (2013). ‘Does everybody understand?’ Teacher questions across disciplines in English-medium university lectures: An exploratory study. Language Value, 5(1), 129–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dafouz, E., & Smit, U. (2020). ROAD-MAPPING English medium education in the internationalised university. Palgrave-McMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delicado Puerto, G., & Pavón, V. (2015). La implantación de titulaciones bilingües en la educación superior: El caso de la formación didáctica del profesorado bilingüe de primaria en la universidad de Extremadura. Educación y Futuro, 321, 35–64.Google Scholar
Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2013). English-Medium instruction at universities: Global challenges. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W., S. Schuetze-Coburn, S. Cumming, & Paolino, D. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 45–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ellis, K. (1993). Teacher questioning behavior and student learning: What research says to teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western States Communication Association, Albuquerque, NM.
Fortanet, I., & Bellés, B. (2005). Spoken academic discourse: An approach to research on lectures. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, volumen monográfico1, 161–178.Google Scholar
Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Hall, J. K. (1995). (Re)creating our worlds with words: A sociohistorical perspective of face-to-face interaction. Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 206–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2001). What is scaffolding? In J. Hammond (Ed.), Scaffolding: Teaching and learning in language and literacy education (pp.1–14). Newtown, Australia: Primary English Teaching Association.Google Scholar
He, A. W., & Young, R. (1998). Language proficiency interviews: A discourse approach. In R. Young & A. W. He (Eds.), Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howard, A. (2010). Is there such a thing as a typical language lesson? Classroom Discourse, 11, 82–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. (2012). Disciplinary identities: Individuality and community in academic writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (1986). From language proficiency to competence. The Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 366–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kunioshi, N., Noguchi, J., Tojo, K., & Hayashi, H. (2016). Supporting English-medium pedagogy through an online corpus of science and engineering lectures. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(3), 293–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. (2011). The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition. Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition and L2 development. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 24–47). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. (2009). Size matters: An exploratory comparison of small- and large-class university lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 28(1), 42–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo, F. (2007). An analytical framework of language integration in L2 content- based courses. Language and Education, 211, 502–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behaviour tracking methodology for CA-for- SLA. Applied Linguistics, 291, 404–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McComas, W. F., & Abraham, L. (2004). Asking more effective questions. Rossier School of Education. <[URL]>
Morell, T. (2007). What enhances EFL students’ participation in lecture discourse? Student, lecturer and discourse perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(3), 222–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Morton, T. (2012). Classroom talk, conceptual change and teacher reflection in bilingual science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 281, 101–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oksaar, E. (1990). Language contact and culture contact: Towards an integrative approach in second language acquisition research. In H. Dechert (Ed.), Current trends in European second language acquisition research (pp. 230–243). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sánchez-García, D. (2010). Classroom interaction in university settings: The case of questions in three disciplines (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universidad Complutense de Madrid. <[URL]>
(2016). A contrastive analysis of Spanish and English-medium instruction in tertiary education: Teacher discourse strategies in a spoken corpus (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidad Complutense de Madrid. <[URL]>
(2018). Teacher questioning: Exploring student interaction and cognitive engagement in Spanish and EMI university lectures. Porta Linguarum, Monográfico III, 103–120.Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the second language classroom: A conversational analysis perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2014). English-medium education in the global society: An introduction. Special issue of International Review of Applied Linguistics, 52(2), 89–98.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. (1994). Frameworks and contexts a genre-based approach to analyzing lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 171–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998). Why ask questions in monologue? Language choice at work in scientific and linguistic talk. In S. Hunston (Ed.), Language at work (pp. 137–150). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. (1992). A functional description of questions. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in spoken discourse analysis (pp. 89–110). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Compernolle, R. (2015). Interaction and second language development: A Vygotskian perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Der Walt, C. (2013). Multilingual higher education: Beyond English medium orientations. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1989). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, S. (2006a). Talking the talk of the TESOL classroom. ELT Journal, 60(2), 133–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006b). Investigating classroom discourse. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Classroom discourse and teacher development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, S., & Lowing, K. (2008). Talking to learn or learning to talk: PGCE students’ development of interactional competence. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference, Herriott Watt University, Edinburgh.
Walsh, S., & Li, L. (2013). Conversations as space for learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 1–20.Google Scholar
Wegerif, R. (2010). Mind-expanding: Teaching for thinking and creativity. Buckingham: Open University Press/Mcgraw Hill.Google Scholar
(2011). Towards a dialogic theory of how children learn to think. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(3), 179–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (2007). Mediation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 178–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, B. M. (2016). Display and referential questions: Effects on student responses. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 15(4), 160–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, L. (1994). University lectures-macro-structure and micro-features. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 159–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, R. F. (2011). Interactional competence in learning, teaching and testing. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 426–443). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Doiz, Aintzane & David Lasagabaster
2023. An Analysis of the Type of Questions Posed by Teachers in English-Medium Instruction at University Level. Education Sciences 13:1 ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Khan, Sarah & Marta Aguilar-Pérez
2023. So What Do We Have Here? An Engineering Lecturer’s Metadiscursive Use of Rhetorical Questions in L1 and English-Medium Instruction. In New Trends on Metadiscourse, ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Lasagabaster, David & Aintzane Doiz
2023. Classroom interaction in English-medium instruction: are there differences between disciplines?. Language, Culture and Curriculum 36:3 ► pp. 310 ff. DOI logo
Lasagabaster, David & Aintzane Doiz
2024. An Examination of the Degree of Complexity of Teacher Questions in English-Medium University Courses. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning 15:2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Wanting, Jinghe Han, Christina Curry & Kay Carroll
2023. Pedagogy in Teaching through English Medium Instruction—Academics’ Cases in a Chinese University. Sustainability 15:14 ► pp. 10942 ff. DOI logo
Zuaro, Beatrice
2023. Content adaptations in English-medium instruction: Comparing L1 and English-medium lectures. English for Specific Purposes 70 ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Lasagabaster, David
2022. English-Medium Instruction in Higher Education, DOI logo
Sánchez-García, Davinia
2020. Internationalization Through Language and Literacy in the Spanish- and English-Medium Education Context. In Integrating Content and Language in Multilingual Universities [Educational Linguistics, 44], ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.