Article In:
Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education: Online-First ArticlesThe effects of instruction on students’ argumentative scientific writing in a Basque medium of instruction setting
The present quasi-experimental study explores the effects of instruction on secondary students’ scientific argumentative writing in a Basque medium of instruction program. Secondary students (N = 105) completed written tasks before and after a unit on energy in their science class as part of this investigation. The experimental group (n = 61) additionally took part in three, one-hour sessions focused on scientific argumentation via instruction in cognitive discourse functions (Dalton-Puffer, 2013), while the control group (n = 44) completed the unit on energy without the additional instruction on argumentation. The final corpus of 210 texts was analysed using Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern (1958). ANOVAs showed that the experimental group’s use of argumentation strategies increased significantly, while the control group’s use of such strategies did not increase. Thus, the results show that instruction on argumentation helps students to write better argumentative compositions. These findings suggest that instruction in the use of Cognitive Discourse Functions allows for academic language learning in bilingual education contexts. The pedagogical implications and future research directions of this study’s findings are discussed.
Keywords: argumentation, cognitive discourse functions, scientific writing, Secondary Education, Basque
Article outline
- Introduction
- Literature review
- Cognitive discourse functions: The case of argue
- Argumentative writing in science
- Research question
- Methods
- Participants
- Materials and procedure
- The instruction
- Data analysis
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusions, future research, limitations and implications
-
References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (76)
Aldekoa, A., Manterola, I. & Idiazabal, I.
(2020) A
trilingual teaching sequence for oral presentation skills in Basque, Spanish and English. The
Language Learning
Journal,
48
(3), 259–271. 
Arias-Hermoso, R., Imaz Agirre, A., & Garro Larrañaga, E.
(2024) A
comparison between input modalities and languages in source-based multilingual argumentative
writing. Assessing
Writing,
60
1, 100813.
Asterhan, C., & Schwarz, B.
(2016) Argumentation
for learning: Well-trodden paths and unexplored territories. Educational
Psychologist,
51
(2), 164–187.
Bailey, A. L., & Butler, F.
(2003) An
evidentiary framework for operationalizing academic language for broad application to K–12 education: A design document (CSE
Report
611). Education,
1522
(310), 1–44. [URL]
Banegas, D. L.
(2012) CLIL
teacher development: Challenges and experiences. Latin American Journal of Content &
Language Integrated
Learning,
5
(1), 46–56.
Banegas, D. L., & Mearns, T.
(2023) The
language quadriptych in content and language integrated learning: Findings from a collaborative action research
study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. Advance
online publication.
Beacco, J. C., Fleming, M., Goullier, F., Thurmann, E., & Vollmer, H.
(2016) A
handbook for curriculum development and teacher training: the language dimension in all
Subjects. Council of Europe. [URL]
Bell, P., & Linn, M. C.
(2000) Scientific
arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International
Journal of Science
Education,
22
(8), 797–817.
Breeze, R., & Gerns Jiménez-Villarejo, P.
(2019) Building
literacies in secondary school history: The specific contribution of academic writing
support. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and
Languages,
6
(1), 21–36.
Cenoz, J.
(2015) Content-based
instruction and content and language integrated learning: The same or different? Language,
Culture and
Curriculum,
28
(1), 8–24.
(2023) Plurilingual
education in the Basque Autonomous Community. In J. M. Cots (Ed.), Profiling
plurilingual education: A pilot study of four Spanish autonomous
communities (pp. 33–53). Edicions de la Universitat de Lleida.
Colmenero, K., & Lasagabaster, D.
(2023) Native
and non-native teachers in a minority language: An analysis of stakeholders’
opinions. International Journal of
Bilingualism,
28
(2), 1–16.
Council of Europe
Coyle, D., & Meyer, O.
(2021) Beyond
CLIL: Pluriliteracies teaching for deeper learning. Cambridge University Press.
Crammond, J.
(1998) The
uses and complexity of argument structures in expert and student persuasive writing. Written
Communication,
15
(2), 230–268.
Crossley, S. A., Tian, Y., & Wan, Q.
(2022) Argumentation
features and essay quality: Exploring relationships and incidence counts. Journal of Writing
Research,
14
(1), 1–34.
Cummins, J.
(1984) Bilingualism
and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Multilingual Matters.
(2021) Rethinking
the education of multilingual learners: A critical analysis of theoretical
concepts. Multilingual Matters.
Dalton-Puffer, C.
(2013) A
construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual
education. European Journal of Applied
Linguistics,
1
(2), 216–253.
(2016) Cognitive
discourse functions: Specifying an integrative interdisciplinary
construct. In T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore, & U. Smit (Eds.), Conceptualising
integration in CLIL and multilingual
education (pp. 29–54). Multilingual Matters.
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Bauer-Marschallinger, S.
(2019) Cognitive
discourse functions meet historical competences: Towards an integrated pedagogy in CLIL history
education. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language
Education,
7
(1), 30–60.
Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., Lorenzo, F., & Nikula, T.
(2014) “You
can stand under my umbrella”: Immersion, CLIL and bilingual education. A response to Cenoz, Genesee & Gorter
(2013). Applied
Linguistics,
35
(2), 213–218.
de Bruin, A., Carreiras, M., & Duñabeitia, J. A.
(2017) The
BEST dataset of language proficiency. Frontiers in
Psychology,
8
1, 1–7.
Erduran, S.
(2007) Methodological
foundations in the study of argumentation in science
classrooms. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation
in Science
Education (pp. 47–69). Springer.
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J.
(2004) TAPping
into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for studying science
discourse. Science
Education,
88
(3), 915–933.
EUSTAT
(2023) Students enrolled in
Obligatory Secondary Education (ESO) by language model in the Basque Country. Retrieved
from: [URL]
Ferretti, R. P. & Fan, Y.
(2016) Argumentative
writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook
of writing
research (pp. 301–315). The Guilford Press.
García-Mila, M. & Andersen, C.
(2007) Cognitive
foundations of learning argumentation. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation
in science
education (pp. 29–45). Springer.
Gerns, P.
(2023a) Building
scientific knowledge in English: Integrating content, cognition and communication in secondary school CLIL
biology. Journal of Language and
Education,
9
(3), 52–78.
(2023b) Qualitative
insights and a first evaluation tool for teaching with cognitive discourse function: “Comparing” in the CLIL science
classroom. Porta
Linguarum,
40
1, 161–179.
IKASELKAR
(2016) EKI
Proiektua. NATuraren zientziak: energiaren beharra, arazo iturri (irakasleentzako gida). [Translated
title: EKI Project. Nature Science: the need for energy, a source of problems
(teachers’ guide)].
Izura, C., Cuetos, F., & Brysbaert, M.
(2014) Lextale-Esp:
A test to rapidly and efficiently assess the Spanish vocabulary
size. Psicológica,
35
1, 49–66.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Bugallo Rodríguez, A. & Duschl, R. A.
(2000) “Doing
the lesson” or “doing science”: Argument in high school genetics. Science
Education,
84
(6), 757–792.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S.
(2007) Argumentation
in science education: An overview. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.) Argumentation
in science
education (pp. 3–27). Springer.
Kelly, G. J., Druker, S., & Chen, C.
(1998) Students’
reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessments with argumentation
analysis. International Journal of Sciences
Education,
20
(7), 849–871.
Kelly, G. J., & Takao, A.
(2002) Epistemic
levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students’ use of evidence in
writing. Science
Education,
86
(3), 314–342.
Kuhn, D. & Modrek, A. S.
(2021) Choose
your evidence. Scientific thinking where it may most count. Science &
Education,
31
1, 21–31.
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M.
(2010) Immersion
and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT
Journal,
64
(4), 367–375.
Lemhöfer, K. & Broersma, M.
(2012) Introducing
LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behaviour Research
Methods,
44
1, 325–343.
Lersundi, A.
(2023) Arloetako alfabetatzearen azterketa batxilergoko diziplinarteko proiektu batean. Kasu
azterketa. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Mondragon University, Translated title: Analysis of
subject-specific literacies in a multidisciplinary project in upper-secondary education. Case
study]. [URL]
Li, X., Wang, W., & Li, Y.
(2022) Systematically
reviewing the potential of scientific argumentation to promote multidimensional conceptual change in science
education. International Journal of Science
Education,
44
(7), 1165–1185.
Liu, F., & Stapleton, P.
(2014) Counterargumentation
and the cultivation of critical thinking in argumentative writing: Investigating washback from a high-stakes
test. System,
45
1, 117–128.
Llinares, A., & McCabe, A.
(2023) Systemic
functional linguistics: The perfect match for content and language integrated
learning. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism,
26
(3), 245–250.
Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R.
(2012) The
roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge University Press.
Llinares, A., & Nashaat-Sobhy, N.
(2023) CLIL
students’ academic language performance on a non-curricular topic: A comparison between high-exposure and low-exposure
groups. English Teaching &
Learning,
47
1, 337–358.
Llinares, A., & Nikula, T.
(2023) CLIL
students’ production of cognitive discourse functions: Comparing Finnish and Spanish
contexts. Language and Education. Advance online
publication.
Lorenzo, F., & Rodríguez, L.
(2014) Onset
and expansion of L2 cognitive academic language proficiency in bilingual settings: CALP in
CLIL. System,
47
1, 64–72.
Lorenzo, F., & Trujillo, F.
(2017) Languages
of schooling in European policymaking: Present state and future outcomes. European Journal of
Applied
Linguistics,
5
(2), 177–197.
Lorenzo, F.
(2017) Historical
literacy in bilingual settings: Cognitive academic language in CLIL history
narratives. Linguistics and
Education,
37
1, 32–41.
Manterola, I., Almgren, M., & Idiazabal, I.
(2012) Basque
L2 development in immersion school settings. International Journal of
Bilingualism,
17
(3), 375–391.
Martín-Gámez, C., & Erduran, S.
(2018) Understanding
argumentation about socio-scientific issues on energy: A quantitative study with primary pre-service teachers in
Spain. Research in Science & Technological
Education,
36
(4), 463–483.
Meneses, A., Montenegro, M., Acevedo, D., Figueroa, J., & Hugo, E.
(2023) Cross-disciplinary
language changes in 4th graders as a predictor of the quality of written scientific
explanation. Journal of Writing Research. Advance online
publication: [URL].
Morton, T.
(2020) Cognitive
discourse functions: A bridge between content, literacy and language for teaching and assessment in
CLIL. CLIL Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural
Education,
3
(1), 7–17.
Nashaat-Sobhy, N.
(2018) Operationalizing
“defining” from a cognitive discourse perspective for learners’
use. In S. M. Anwaruddin (Ed.), Knowledge
mobilization in TESOL: Connecting research and
practice (pp. 94–112).
Nikula, T., Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., & Lorenzo, F.
(2016) More
than content and language: The complexity of integration in CLIL and bilingual
education. In T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore, & U. Smit (Eds.), Conceptualising
integration in CLIL and multilingual
education (pp. 1–26). Multilingual Matters.
Pavón, V., & Pérez, A.
(2017) Enhancing
disciplinary literacies: Languages of schooling and whole-school language projects in
Spain. European Journal of Applied
Linguistics,
6
(1), 109–130.
Polias, J.
(2016) Apprenticing
students into science: Doing, talking & writing scientifically. Lexis Education.
Qin, J., & Karabacak, E.
(2010) The
analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative
writing. System,
38
(3), 444–456.
Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., McNurlen, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A., & Kim, S.
(2001) Influence
of oral discussion on written argument. Discourse
Processes,
32
(2–3), 155–175.
Roca de Larios, J., Coyle, Y., & Garcia, V.
(2023) The
effects of using cognitive discourse functions to instruct 4th-year children on report writing in a CLIL science
class. Studies in Second Language Learning and
Teaching,
12
(4), 597–622.
Rolstad, K.
(2015) Second
language instructional competence. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism,
20
(5), 497–509.
Sagasta, M. P.
(2003) Acquiring
writing skills in a third language: The positive effects of bilingualism. International Journal
of
Bilingualism,
7
(1), 27–42.
Sampson, V., & Clark, D.
(2008) Assessment
of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future
directions. Science
Education,
92
(3), 447–472.
Sandoval, W. A.
(2003) Conceptual
and epistemic aspects of students’ scientific explanations. Journal of the Learning
Sciences,
12
(1), 5–51.
Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A.
(2005) The
quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and
instruction,
23
(1), 23–55.
(2007) What
can argumentation tell us about epistemology? In S. Erduran, & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.) Argumentation
in Science
Education (pp. 3–27). Dordrecht: Springer.
Santiago Schwarz, V., & Hamman-Ortiz, L.
(2020) Systemic
functional linguistics, teacher education, and writing outcomes for U.S. elementary English learners: A review of the
literature. Journal of Second Language
Writing,
49
1, 100727.
Schwarz, B. B., Neuman, Y., Gil, J., & Ilya, M.
(2003) Construction
of collective and individual knowledge in argumentation activity. Journal of the Learning
Sciences,
12
(2), 219–256.
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C.
(2008) Teaching
disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational
Review,
78
(1), 40–59.
(2012) What
is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topics in Language
Disorders,
32
(1), 7–18.
Simon, S.
(2008) Using
Toulmin’s Argument Pattern in the evaluation of argumentation in school science. International
Journal of Research and Method in
Education,
31
(3), 277–289.
Takao, A. Y., & Kelly, G. J.
(2003) Assessment
of evidence in university students’ scientific writing. Science &
Education,
12
1, 341–363.
Tang, K. S.
(2019) The
role of language in scaffolding content & language integration in CLIL science
classrooms. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language
Education,
7
(2), 315–328.
Toulmin, S.
(1958) The
Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whittaker, R., & McCabe, A.
(2023) Expressing
evaluation across disciplines in primary and secondary CLIL writing: A longitudinal
study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism,
26
(3), 345–362.