References
Abedi, J
(2007) Summary and recommendations. In J. Abedi (Ed.), English language proficiency assessment in the nation: Current status and future practice (pp. 121–132). Davis, CA: University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Abedi, J., & Herman, J
(2010) Assessing English language learners’ opportunity to learn mathematics: Issues and limitations. Teachers College Record, 112(3), 723–746.Google Scholar
Adler, J
(1997) A participatory-inquiry approach and the mediation of mathematical knowledge in a multilingual classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(3), 235–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aguirre-Muñoz, Z., & Amabisca, A
(2010) Defining opportunity to learn for English language learners: Linguistic and cultural dimensions of ELLs’ instructional contexts. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 15(3), 259–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailey, A., & Butler, F
(2009) Ethical considerations in the assessment of the language and content knowledge of U. S. school-age English learners. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(2), 177–193. DOI logo
Bailey, A, & Heritage, M
(2008) Formative assessment for literacy, grades K-6: Building reading and academic language skills across the curriculum [E-reader version]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Bigelow, M
(2010) The policies and politics of educating refugee adolescents. Language Learning, 60 (Supplement 1), 119–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chamot, A
(1996) The cognitive academic language learning approach: A model for linguistically diverse classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 96(3), 259–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, H., Wilmes, C., Boals, T., & Santos, M
(2008) Issues in the development of Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) for WIDA consortium states (WCER Working Paper No. 2008–2). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Coxhead, A
(2000) A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cramer, K., Behr, M., Post, T., & Lesh, R
(2009) Rational number project: Initial fraction ideas. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Crookes, G
(1989) Grassroots action to improve ESL programs. University of Hawai’i Working Papers in ESL, 821, 45–61.Google Scholar
Cummins, J
(1980) The cross-lingual dimensions of language proficiency: Implications for bilingual education and the optimal age issue. TESOL Quarterly, 14(2), 40–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeCapua, A., Smathers, W., & Tang, L
(2009) Meeting the needs of students with limited or interrupted schooling: A guide for educators. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Duff, P
(1986) Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 147–181). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Echevarría, J., Vogt, M.E., & Short, D.J
(2010) Making content comprehensible for secondary English learners: The SIOP model. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Ellis, R
(1994) The study of second language acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G
(2005) Analysing learner language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Engestrom, Y
(1987) Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
(2001) Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G
(2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gersten, R., Baker, S.K., Shanahan, T., Linan-Thompson, S., Collins, P., & Scarcella, R
(2007) Effective literacy and English language instruction for English learners in the elementary grades: A practice guide (NCEE 2007–4011). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U. S. Department of Education. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A
(1999) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Hansen-Thomas, H
(2009) English language learners and math: Discourse, participation, and community in reform-oriented, middle school mathematics classes. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Hess, K., & Kearns, J
(2010) An introduction to the learning progressions frameworks designed for use with the common core state standards in mathematics K-12. Retrieved from [URL]
Janzen, J
(2008) Teaching English language learners in the content areas. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1010–1038. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G
(2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 3–31). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ketterlin-Geller, L., Chard, D., & Fien, H
(2008) Making connections in mathematics: Conceptual mathematics intervention for low-performing students. Remedial and Special Education, 29(1), 33–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, K
(2014) An activity theory perspective on academic language use by English language learners in a high school math classroom. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Moschkovich, J
(1999) Supporting the participation of English language learners in mathematical discussions. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(1), 11–19.Google Scholar
(2011) Supporting mathematical reasoning and sense making for English learners. In M. Struchens & J. Quander (Eds.), Focus in high school mathematics: Fostering reasoning and sense making for all students (pp. 17–35). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.Google Scholar
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]
(2009) Executive summary — Focus in high school mathematics: Reasoning and sense-making. Retrieved from [URL]
New Zealand Ministry of Education
(2008) The English language learning progressions: Years 9–13. Retrieved from [URL]
Scarcella, R
(2003) Academic English: A conceptual framework (Technical Report 2003–1). Framework. Irvine, CA: The University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M.J
(2001) Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education, 12(4), 431–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R
(2001) Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Setati, M., & Adler, J
(2000) Between languages and discourses: Language practices in primary multilingual mathematics classrooms in South Africa. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(3), 243–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P
(1999) The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., & Goldschmidt, P
(1999) Opportunity to learn, language proficiency, and immigrant status effects on mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(2), 102–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
West, M
(1953) A general service list of English words with semantic frequencies and a supplementary word list for the writing of popular science and technology. London: Longman, Green.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, G
(1997) An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse. Language Testing, 14(1), 85–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, L., & Kroger, R
(2000) Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Yamagata-Lynch, L
(2010) Activity systems analysis methods: Understanding complex learning environments. Boston, MA: Springer US. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwiers, J
(2007) Teacher practices and perspectives for developing academic language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 93–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Building academic language: Essential practices for content classrooms, grades 5–12. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Barwell, Richard
2015. Commentary on Berger Dissertation Summary. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 3:2  pp. 314 ff. DOI logo
Berger, Angela
2015. Conceptualizing the interaction between language and mathematics. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 3:2  pp. 285 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.